Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

False Negative?


ChristineWas

Recommended Posts

ChristineWas Rookie

I have been extremely sick for two years and have had almost every potential symptom for celiac disease. After my dad was diagnosed and then when my blood tests strongly pointed toward celiac disease, we got very excited about finally being close to an official diagnosis. However, my EGD results came back negative.

I am so discouraged! I just want to know why I am sick. I was careful not to eliminate gluten from my diet before the EGD to avoid a false negative.

Are there other factors that can lead to a false negative?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Bubba's Mom Enthusiast

Yes. Damage can be patchy, so getting a sample for biopsy can be tricky. That's why they say around 8 samples is best. Also, the scope doesn't reach through the whole small intestine. You could have damage outside of the reach of the scope?

In addition, maybe your Ceiac was caught before you have noticeable damage? I hope so!

If your blood test was positive..go completely gluten free. You will avoid all of the nasty malabsorption issues and future diseases that come from an inflamed system.

ChristineWas Rookie

Thanks. I heard the GI docs talking about getting a biopsy in two places before they knocked me out, so that may be all they did. The silly endoscopy feels like such a waste of money now! (No insurance.)

I think your words may be all I needed to keep me on a gluten-free diet. Thank you! I have been feeling better since I cut gluten out (right after my EGD). I just really wanted that official diagnosis.

rosetapper23 Explorer

One of the leading experts on celiac, Dr. Alessio Fasano, has spoken on this very topic many times and has written several articles in which he has challenged whether endoscopies should be considered the gold standard for diagnosing celiac. The reasons for this is that the scope may not reach the damaged area, there may not be enough damaged area to get a good sample, the surgeon is not skilled enough or experienced enough to know where and how many samples to take, and the pathologist may not be competent enough to determine whether a person has celiac or not (a recent study showed that pathologists at medical hospitals were better at detecting celiac; whereas, doctors at regular hospitals did not do so well). Dr. Fasano has pointed out that if you have positive bloodwork and/or a positive gene test, your symptoms resolve on a gluten-free diet, and the symptoms return when gluten is reintroduced, a diagnosis of celiac should be made. There are many doctors who will diagnose celiac without a positive biopsy. Others will diagnose celiac even without positive bloodwork.

When I arrived in the office of the gastro of my HMO after suffering from classic celiac and Dermatitis Herpetiformis symptoms all of my life, he apologized profusely for the missed diagnosis on behalf of all of the doctors I had seen over the years. He scheduled an endoscopy, but because my IV blew out and I bled like a fountain for quite some time, he refused to do the procedure, stating, "I'm 100% positive you have celiac; this procedure is unnecessary." So...I agree that you should go gluten free for the rest of your life. When you occasionally get glutened and become extremely ill as a result, you will know with certainty that you have made the right decision.

By the way, you might search for the articles that state that taking at least eight samples is required for a celiac diagnosis....and take them to your surgeons to request your money back on the procedure (at least, THEIR fees).

ravenwoodglass Mentor

You had positive blood tests, your father is celiac. You are celiac. No doubt.

I hope you are feeling better soon and you may find your GP gives you the official diagnosis once your symptoms have resolved and your antibody levels have dropped on retesting. Ask for them to be retested at 6 months to a year if your doctor doesn't suggest it himself. Be sure to also have them do full vitamin and mineral panels on you as many of us need to supplement for low iron, ferritin, B and D and more until we have healed.

ChristineWas Rookie

Rosetapper23, thank you for the information about Dr. Fasano. Very helpful and beneficial information.

ravenwoodglass, thanks for the tips. They run tests on my blood every time I go in so I actually am taking B and D supplements. :)

frieze Community Regular
  On 1/15/2012 at 7:30 PM, rosetapper23 said:

One of the leading experts on celiac, Dr. Alessio Fasano, has spoken on this very topic many times and has written several articles in which he has challenged whether endoscopies should be considered the gold standard for diagnosing celiac. The reasons for this is that the scope may not reach the damaged area, there may not be enough damaged area to get a good sample, the surgeon is not skilled enough or experienced enough to know where and how many samples to take, and the pathologist may not be competent enough to determine whether a person has celiac or not (a recent study showed that pathologists at medical hospitals were better at detecting celiac; whereas, doctors at regular hospitals did not do so well). Dr. Fasano has pointed out that if you have positive bloodwork and/or a positive gene test, your symptoms resolve on a gluten-free diet, and the symptoms return when gluten is reintroduced, a diagnosis of celiac should be made. There are many doctors who will diagnose celiac without a positive biopsy. Others will diagnose celiac even without positive bloodwork.

When I arrived in the office of the gastro of my HMO after suffering from classic celiac and Dermatitis Herpetiformis symptoms all of my life, he apologized profusely for the missed diagnosis on behalf of all of the doctors I had seen over the years. He scheduled an endoscopy, but because my IV blew out and I bled like a fountain for quite some time, he refused to do the procedure, stating, "I'm 100% positive you have celiac; this procedure is unnecessary." So...I agree that you should go gluten free for the rest of your life. When you occasionally get glutened and become extremely ill as a result, you will know with certainty that you have made the right decision.

By the way, you might search for the articles that state that taking at least eight samples is required for a celiac diagnosis....and take them to your surgeons to request your money back on the procedure (at least, THEIR fees).

Rose, great minds think alike! we shouldn't pay for that which we didn't get!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,008
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Wigglywoo27
    Newest Member
    Wigglywoo27
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • DebJ14
      Our son was put on Minocycline for his acne.  It did not solve the acne problem.  He developed drug induced lupus and pericarditis from it and missed an entire year of high school.  He literally went from playing football to bedridden in a couple of weeks.  His PCP tested him for genetic antibiotic resistance and he cannot take any drug in the Tetracycline family.  His gut microbiome was totally destroyed.  In fact he had a stool test done and had no good bacteria, whatsoever.   What did fix his (and his brother's acne) years after the Minocycline debacle was when I was diagnosed with Celiac disease and the kids were tested.  They were both put on a Gluten Free/ Caesin Free diet and...
    • wellthatsfun
      i am australian. we do have plenty of substitutes, but most are very expensive compared to the originals. i believe i'll just stick to home cooked meals and not have many treats at all. it's sad but it's just so much easier. also, ive heard far too many horror stories of people ordering gluten free food from restaurants and cafés, explicitly telling servers and kitchen staff that cross contamination is a strict no go, and they still get very sick. until i find a reasonably priced fully gluten free kitchen somewhere, i am not eating out for my safety and sanity.
    • wellthatsfun
      thank you all for the kind words and support. it truly means a lot. i know i will adapt, it really just is a grieving process right now though. looking forward to feeling healthier!
    • The Logician
      To Trent’s, yes, from what i’ve read it is not uncommon for digestive systems to become less tolerant to gluten over time. Many types of sensitivity or allergies arise in older people who never had a problem. I don’t see why you are focusing on anything but the fact that after years of my sensitivity to gluten, for whatever reason , it has disappeared after a bout of antibiotics. What i’ve read is antibiotics can make gluten sensitivity worse. In any event, in my case, if I can still eat all the wheat products I want with no reaction after a month or more since my hospital stay this is something that should be investigated. Time will tell.
    • The Logician
      I had a UTI, blood cultures are standard to insure that the infection does not get in the bloodstream which can lead to sepsis and death. In my case there was bacteria in my blood which necessitated 48 hours of antibiotic IV
×
×
  • Create New...