Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

3 Genes?


beebs

Recommended Posts

beebs Enthusiast

I was reading on facebook and someone said that their husband tested positive for 3 coeliac genes??? I thought we only had two copies of HLA DQ genes? What do you suppose it means?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

I don't understand the genetics, but I do understand that you can have half genes, and that in Europe there are more than two genes recognized as celiac genes.

beebs Enthusiast

This is here in oz - we only recognise DQ8 & DQ2 - man genetics is so complicated!

ravenwoodglass Mentor

This is here in oz - we only recognise DQ8 & DQ2 - man genetics is so complicated!

It is the same way here in the US. It seems to depend on what country you are in as to what genes are recognized. Research is showing that at least 9 but possibly many more genes are involved.

My genes are not celiac associated genes here in the US. They are thought to be genes associated with RA. Oddly enough some folks with RA respond quite well to the gluten-free diet. My RA symptoms resolved within 6 months. Now in the Middle East and Asia those same genes are recognized as being celiac associated genes.

Doctor put too much stress on a science that is in it's infancy. Genetics can not be used to firmly rule in or rule out celiac.

beebs Enthusiast

I totally get you raven, what I meant though was - don't we only have two copies of HLA DQ genes? One inherited from each parent?

So are you HLA DQ 9/HLA DQ 9?? I am also DQ 6 - which I heard was associated with RA also - but I could be wrong!

This gene stuff is way too smart for me :lol:

Skylark Collaborator

HLA-DQ is made from two proteins, alpha and beta. You get two genes for alpha and two for beta, one from each parent. The genes are called HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DQB1. DQ2 and DQ8 are the so-called celiac HLA-DQB1 chains. The third so-called celiac gene is HLA-DQA1 *0505. It is possible to be unlucky enough to get all three.

beebs Enthusiast

Thank you Skylark! You always know the scientific stuff!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

beebs, it's way too smart for me too, having flunked chemistry and math in high school :o However I went on-line shopping with the Google department store and found this which may help some:

Open Original Shared Link

What does HLA mean?

HLA stands for Human Leukocyte Antigen which are certain molecules found on the surface of cells. More than 100,000 HLA molecules (many copies of some few variants; see below) can be expressed on the surface of a single cell. The genes which encode (i.e. determine the structure of) these HLA molecules are found on Chromosome 6 in humans.

HLA molecules are involved in immune regulation. They bind to small fragments(peptides) of bacteria, virus etc. and present these to particular cells (T-cells) of the immune system. T-cells patrol the body and are educated to inspect whether the HLA molecules display peptides that are foreign to the body. If a T-cell recognizes something foreign, it sends out an "alarm". This will result in an immune response and the immune system will start to attempt to defeat the presumed intruder in the body. It is likely that in Celiacs the immune system reacts to gluten and that the immune response which is initiated in the small intestine on contact with gluten results in alterations of the normal gut tissue.

Why only some individuals react to gluten is not completely understood. There exist a large number of different variants of HLA molecules. Which HLA molecules an individual manufactures is determined by the gene-variants the individual has inherited from his or her parents. It is conceivable that some particular varieties of HLA molecules (i.e. DQ2 and DQ8; see later) are particularly efficient in binding and presenting gluten fragments and that individuals who carry these particular HLA molecules are more prone to develop Celiac Disease. It is important to remember that the very same HLA molecules that present gluten fragments also are very efficient in presenting fragments of virus and bacteria and are thus of great importance for the body to survive from various infections.

How does one test for HLA markers? Where? How much does it cost? Will insurance cover it?

HLA typing can be done either by analyzing the genes which code for the HLA molecules or by analyzing the HLA molecules themselves. Today most laboratories perform HLA typing by analyzing the HLA molecules on the surface of cells. Conveniently the typing is done with leukocytes (white blood cells) that are isolated from a blood sample. In some few years gene-analysis may become the standard way of doing HLA typing.

Most large commercial laboratories can perform HLA typing. The cost varies, depending on where it is performed, and how many HLA markers are specified to be analyzed. The costs range from $160 to $800 in the few examples the Listowners have seen. Those who donate blood for celiac genetics studies typically get the HLA typing done for free.

Not only will insurance generally NOT cover HLA typing (at least in the US), but some patients are fearful that if their insurance company discovers that they have HLA markers implying a much higher risk for developing a serious disease, that in the future, coverage may be denied. This is topic on which heated discussion is occurring in the U.S. Some patients actually use a different doctor for their HLA typing and do not submit the invoice to their insurance company for this reason.

How many different types of HLA markers are there?

Your HLA type can be called your body type just as your particular ABO type is your blood type. HLA terminology is rather complex. To make matters worse, the coding has been changed several times by the immunologists. The following is an attempt to explain the HLA system in a simplistic way:

HLA molecules exist in two classes. HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-C molecules make up the class I molecules and HLA-DR, HLA-DQ and HLA-DP molecules make up the class II molecules. All HLA molecules consist of two units; an alpha chain and a beta chain. For each chain there is a corresponding gene. The genes coding for HLA molecules (except the gene coding for the beta chain of class I molecules) are positioned on a stretch of chromosome 6 like pearls on a string. For each gene locus (each position) there exist a large number of variants or alleles (colors of pearls). For some loci there are more than 100 different variants described! Each individual has two chromosomes (pearl strings) which are inherited from the mother and the father. The composition of alleles on the two chromosomes (combination of colored pearls on the strings at different positions) are characteristic for each individual. Typically, the genes of one chromosome (the colored pearls on one string) code for one HLA-A molecule, one HLA-B molecule, one HLA-C molecule, two HLA-DR molecules, one HLA-DQ molecule and one HLA-DP molecule. Provided that the genes on the individual's two chromosomes code for different variants (i.e. there are different color of the pearls in the corresponding positions on the two strings) an individual may express as much as 14 different HLA molecules. (The number can be larger as in some instances alpha- and beta-chains of HLA-DQ and HLA-DP molecules that are coded for by genes on opposite chromosomes may form functional molecules).

Which alleles (color of pearls) that occur together at the various loci (positions) are not completely random. Some combinations are particularly frequent. Several combinations of alleles (color of pearls) are usually maintained together as gene blocks (segments of pearls). If you have one particular allele (color of pearl) at one locus (position) you very often have another distinct allele (color of pearl) at a neighboring locus (position). This phenomena is termed linkage disequilibrium and is very important for understanding association of certain diseases with particular HLA markers.

Which HLA markers are associated with Celiac Disease? I have been confused, sometimes reading about DQ2, at other times about DR3, B8 and other markers.

The three markers DR3, B8 and DQ2 are all associated with Celiac Disease. The reason for this is that the genes which code for B8, DR3 (also termed DRw17) and DQ2 are in linkage disequilibrium. They are part of a gene segment that is usually maintained as a gene block. This fact has posed a problem in the work to identify which molecules are actually involved in the development of Celiac Disease and which alleles are just associated with celiac disease because the genes coding for these molecules are usually linked with the predisposing genes. In other words: Which of B8, DR3 or DQ2 are actually involved in the development of Celiac Disease and which are just marker molecules?

Those Celiacs who are not DR3 positive very often are DR5/DR7 (DR5 is coded for by genes on the one chromosome and DR7 is coded for by genes on the other chromosome). Individuals who are DR3, almost always also are DQ2 (because the genes coding for DR3 and DQ2 are in linkage disequilibrium - they are in a conserved gene block). The names of the genes in this gene block that jointly code for DQ2 are DQA1*0501 (which codes for the alpha chain) and DQB1*02 (which codes for the beta chain). The DQA1*0501 gene also exists in a gene block that contains the gene coding for DR5, and the DQB1*02 gene exists in a gene block that contains the gene coding for DR7. Individuals who are DR5/DR7 may thus also possess the DQA1*0501 and DQB1*02 genes. In contrast to individuals who are DR3-DQ2 the DQ genes in DR5/DR7 individuals which code for DQ2 are located on two different chromosomes. This explains why DR5/DR7 individuals also have a predisposition to develop Celiac Disease and strongly indicates that it is DQ2 coded for by the DQA1*0501 and DQB1*02 genes that actually are involved in the development of Celiac Disease. About 95% of the Celiac population carry these particular genes.

In addition, another 4-5% of the Celiac population have genes that code for DR4 and DQ8 molecules (the genes coding for DR4 and DQ8 are maintained in block of genes). Probably it is the DQ8 molecule that mediates the disease predisposition in this subgroup of patients. Some very few Celiacs are neither DQ2 nor DQ8 implying that HLA typing is not a perfect predictor of risk for Celiac Disease.

If one has two copies of the Celiac-related markers instead of one, does it make a difference?

Recent results indicate that individuals who carry the DQA1*0501 and DQB1*02 alleles and in addition have an extra copy of the DQB1*02 allele have an increased risk of developing Celiac Disease. This is called a "gene-dosage effect". The DR types of individuals who usually carry these DQ genes are DR3/DR3 (i.e. DR3 homozygous) and DR3/DR7.

Are there non-HLA genes involved in determining if someone has the potential to get Celiac Disease?

Probably. The fact that there is a difference in the risk factors between identical twins (70%) and HLA-identical siblings (30-40%) implies that there are probably non-HLA genetic factors involved. Research on this topic is continuing.

Are there any known HLA or other genetic markers associated with gluten intolerance in autism?

Not much has been published on this topic. Dr. Reed Warren of Utah State University has published several studies on the genetics of autism in Northern Utah. Those studies did not show a significantly increased prevalence of DR3 in autism. Gene Stubbs of Ohio State University has stated in unpublished correspondence that he found substantially increased DR3 in the parents of autistic children.

Hope this helps some. Or not :blink: ??

beebs Enthusiast
:blink: :blink:
Bubba's Mom Enthusiast
:blink: LOL! Clear as mud to me. I was tested for the DQ2 and DQ8 only. My Dr. didn't entertain the idea of there being any other genes associated with Celiac. He said my genetic testing was negative for Celiac. I'd explain that info posted above to him if I knew what it meant. Maybe I should copy and print it off? B)
beebs Enthusiast

:blink: LOL! Clear as mud to me. I was tested for the DQ2 and DQ8 only. My Dr. didn't entertain the idea of there being any other genes associated with Celiac. He said my genetic testing was negative for Celiac. I'd explain that info posted above to him if I knew what it meant. Maybe I should copy and print it off? B)

:lol: :lol:

mushroom Proficient

Sorry about that, you two ;) It was the nearest to layman's language I could find, where you didn't have to be Skylark to decode it :lol:

Skylark Collaborator

:lol: Yeah, some of this stuff takes a doctorate to understand. Good thing I have one!

Bubba's Mom, some diagnostic labs like Enterolab only test B chain so they would only test for DQ2 and DQ8. Better labs like Prometheus also test for DQA *0505.

I wouldn't get too hung up on the genetic testing. You can be celiac without the so-called celiac genes, and also have the genes and not be celiac.

nora-n Rookie

I have two DQ5 , I had to get tested by enterolab to get any answer.

The first lab that tested me and reported negative gene tests, used a rapid test that only tells you the DQ2 or 8, of any are present.

Enterolab sends the gene tests out, I think to the American Red Cross, and chose to only order the beta chains to conserve costs.

Those of you earlier in the thread:

Nowadays usually labs test both the beta and alpha chains, but only report for DQ2 and 8 to the doctor since often doctors do not know what to do with all the surplus information.....often people have phoned the lab and gotten the complete report.

This is because there are some celiacs with half genes (usually meaning 05* in the alpha chain)

A few have posted here.

Actually, more people with suspicious symptoms and DQ2,2 have posted than those with half genes.

researchmomma Contributor

Skylark, what is the sero equivalent of this The third so-called celiac gene is HLA-DQA1 *0505. ?

This stuff is so interesting to me. My daughter had her gene testing at Prometheus but they only reported: Negative for DQ 2 or 8. So I am considering giving them a call to see if they have any further info.

She got glutened this weekend and the reaction WAS pretty strong so we continue to confirm via elimination that gluten is a problem for her.

The gene info is more for my own personal information. My grandmother died from potential Celiac related (or NCGI) diseases (duodenal cancer and pernicous anemia) and my Mom has Grave's and Parathyroid tumors. So the info is really interesting to me.

Edited to correct that the reaction to gluten WAS strong not wasn't.

nora-n Rookie

05* alone means half a DQ2,5 kind of

0501 is the alpha chain if DQ2,5 but it is possible to have that alone

0505, I do not remember anyone posting with an actual 0505 alpha chain but before they just called it 05* I think

Skylark Collaborator

Skylark, what is the sero equivalent of this The third so-called celiac gene is HLA-DQA1 *0505. ?

Serology comes from B chain. A1*0505 is one of the A chains that is strongly linked to DQ7 so if they found DQ7 there is a chance she has A1*0505. A1*0501 is linked to DQ2.

Nora, A1*0505 is the allele linked to DQB1*0301 (as DQ7.5) and is occasionally found as the only celiac allele folks without DQ2 or DQ8 B chains. DQB1*0301 is not thought to confer risk. It is one nucleotide different from A1*0501 and translates to the same protein. Because of this, some labs are labeling A1*0501/5 as a celiac gene. (Since Beebs' friend has DQ2 and DQ8, he would have A1*0501. I didn't think of that when I typed *0505.)

nora-n Rookie

there are some charts with alpha and beta chains here

Open Original Shared Link

so 0505is simply DQ7....and DQ7 celiacs are described in literature, so one could say DQ2, 8 and 7 are celiac genes.

Hadjivassiliou found that 20% of his gluten ataxia patients had DQ1.

There are also interesting charts on the HLA DR page on wikipedia, with corresponding diseases

Skylark Collaborator

so 0505is simply DQ7....and DQ7 celiacs are described in literature, so one could say DQ2, 8 and 7 are celiac genes.

The stuff I've been reading says that the DQ7 B1*0301 chain does not seem to confer risk if there is a different A chain with it. The risk is conferred by A1*0505 (or possibly other HLA genes in the DQ7.5 haplotype). Remember, DQ7.3 is reasonably common, does not confer celiac risk, and still can have B1*0301. Also A*05 jumps risk considerably in DQ2 folks.

nora-n Rookie

that was the article on sardinian or something celiacs with DQ7, and they probably meant DQ7,5. Of course it is the 0505 alpha chain that is the celiac gene.

By the way, 23andme only tests for 0501 alpha chain for celiac risk. I do not know if it is 0501 or 05* they test for.

domesticactivist Collaborator

Wow! Thanks for that.

We has the kids reared by kimball genetics division of labcorp. They sent back a risk assessment based on both alpha and beta. Then I called the genetic councilor and they sent me the full report. I've heard (but not confirmed) that Prometheus can do the same

nora-n Rookie

interesting about the full report.

Here in Norway (and Sweden) they still only tell you if you are positive or negative for DQ2 or 8, so I had to order the test via Enterolab.

This is so expensive because it costs so much extra from europe for special shipping. I guess ordinary mail would do, but I am not sure.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,890
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kathryn sealey
    Newest Member
    Kathryn sealey
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      First, I hope you know that celiac disease is not an allergy to gluten. It is an autoimmune disease reaction that is triggered by gluten consumption. Allergies don't trigger immunes responses whereby the body attacks it's own tissues but this is what is actually happening with celiac disease and what distinguishes celiac disease from NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).  Second, though I think your question other question has already been answered. Since the tTG-IGA antibody test is only 90 to 98% specific, elevated values for this test will be have non-celiac disease causes in 2 to 8 out of 100 cases. I realize that is addressing your question in a general way but the non-celiac causes have also be covered in this thread, though not to  the granularity of giving percentages to each non-celiac cause. Not sure why that is important to you at this point. First, you need to separate whether it is due to celiac disease or not. If not, then start sorting out what the other cause is. But as I stated above, by far the most likely cause is celiac disease so that is the place to start. Sure, we get it. Having  to eliminate gluten from your life spells huge culinary and social changes and challenges. But it's still better than facing cancer or host of other diseases that less definitive antidotes and outcomes. With celiac disease you don't even have to worry about taking medications because, as of now at least, there are none. The treatment is very straightforward. Avoid gluten.
    • Shining My Light
      @trents This info is so helpful and I’m absorbing it all. My blood tests were almost a month ago and I feel like it came out of left field. I never even heard of term “silent celiac.” I thought celiac gave you violent diarrhea when you consumed a tiny bit of gluten. That’s it. Not that it damages your small intestine, not that it made the absorption of vitamins and minerals compromised. None of it. To me it was just an allergy to gluten.  My close family and friends think I’m crazy for even giving it a second thought because “no symptoms, no worries.”  It’s unfortunately hard for me to let something go that I don’t know enough about. Therefore all the research came into play.  I’m glad I’ve joined this forum. It’s more helpful to talk things through with people than looking through cases studies without being able to ask questions. I’m on the fence right now on what my odds are. I don’t know enough about the other variables and probability of why a TTG level would be raised.  The questions I still have lingering are:  -what are the odds that these levels are raised in something other than celiac? For instance of all positive TTG tests that have been done how many of those are from celiac? I know it’s a big ask but to me that’s something that is super unclear to me.  - what are the TTG levels in something other than celiac? (I.e. in things like type 1 diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, hepatitis, viruses, NCGS, etc, are the TTG levels the same as those that have celiac, higher or lower?)  - even if it’s not celiac and it’s NCGS, if my body is “responding” to gluten, and creating antibodies to it, wouldn’t that be something to avoid anyway? Maybe not doing the damage but still my body doesn’t like it?  -could I really possibly follow a gluten free life as close as I follow Jesus?  Definitely understand now that key piece of needing an EGD. It’s looking at things from another angle. Also with all the other associated blood work, more angles.  I would like to say please forgive me if any of my questions seem as though I’m trying to be difficult. Making lifelong decisions is hard.  I do have decisions to make as you have said. I clearly will need convinced in order for this to be something to be committed to.  I would hope that there will be something in the future that comes out that will offset gluten in bodies the same was it does for sugar in diabetics.  My compassion is far greater for anyone carrying the burden of celiac than it was a month ago knowing what I know now.  I appreciate you helping me work this out, in real time. It’s been lonely up to this point. Only me talking about what I’ve read to people who don’t think I should be bothering with it any further. 😆 So thank you! 🙏            
    • trents
      Lot's of folks would trade places with you with regard to the unintentional weight loss. Seriously, though, I would be concerned about vitamin and mineral depletion due to malabsorption in the small bowel. One thing you can do now to address that which will not jeopardize the accuracy of further testing for celiac disease would be to start taking some high potency vitamin and mineral supplements. Make sure they are all gluten free if you will continue to use them - after diagnosis, that is. Wheat starch is sometimes used as a filler in pills. A multivitamin may not be potent enough. So, I would go for a B-complex, magnesium glycinate (the form of magnesium is important for good absorption and to prevent a laxative effect), zinc picolinate, and D3 (around 5000IU daily). These are supplements we routinely recommend on this forum to newly diagnosed celiacs and in view of your dramatic weight loss it would likely be appropriate for you as well. It often takes around 2 years for the villous lining of the small bowel to fully heal after going gluten free and until then, nutrient absorption will be compromised. The small bowel is the section of the intestines where all of our nutrition is taken up. Keep us posted.
    • terrymouse
      I'm 5'2" so it's weight I could afford to lose. I guess what's concerning is that it's not on purpose, I haven't been active because I don't have much energy, and it's been steadily going down since I started keeping track of it. So I'm not too worried about where I'm at right now, but it's something I'm keeping an eye on.
    • trents
      A classic case of more than one medical problem going on at a time. We often forget that can happen. Are you concerned about your weight loss? Is your current weight too thin for your height, gender and general build?
×
×
  • Create New...