Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Enterolab's Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody Test


TJSpin

Recommended Posts

TJSpin Rookie

I just ordered the Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase Antibodytest through Enterolabs (did the GS testing so they already had the sample). I am now interested in the Cyrex Labs Array panel 3. Should I wait for the Enterolabs report to come back or do people poo-poo that test, too? I cann't keep "wasting money" if that is what I am doing by ordering these Enterolab tests. I am so fearful that the regular blood test won't be accurate. I am not that worried about testing for celiac but I do want to know about gluten sensitivity! I will (and am) responding the same way.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Skylark Collaborator

There is no validated diagnostic test for gluten sensitivity. We told you that in the other thread; making a new thread will not change the facts. If gluten sensitivity is all you're looking for, you are just wasting money at Cyrex. (They will be happy to tell you otherwise and take your $$ but if you trust them I have a bridge for sale in New York City...)

burdee Enthusiast

I just ordered the Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase Antibodytest through Enterolabs (did the GS testing so they already had the sample). I am now interested in the Cyrex Labs Array panel 3. Should I wait for the Enterolabs report to come back or do people poo-poo that test, too? I cann't keep "wasting money" if that is what I am doing by ordering these Enterolab tests. I am so fearful that the regular blood test won't be accurate. I am not that worried about testing for celiac but I do want to know about gluten sensitivity! I will (and am) responding the same way.

I've noticed that "people poo-poo" any test that they have not personally used. Maybe there's a sense that "I suffered through eating gluten so I could take a blood test and/or endoscopy, which makes otherkinds of tests worthless." Obviously, that's just a guess, but I've heard all kinds of naysaying about Enterolab tests since I took those in 2004. I chose Elab because I didn't have to eat gluten to take stool tests. IgA antibodies stay in the intestines a lot longer than they stay in the blood. So you can abstain from gluten for several months and still have gluten antibodies in the stool, which Elab tests detect.

As for TtG antibodies from Elab tests, my mainstream doc and my naturopath accepted those results as proof of celiac disease, when considered with my Elab gluten antibody and dna results, aa well as my long history of celiac symptoms.However, reather than ordering individual Elab tests, I ordered the whole package (gliaden and casein antibodies, TtG, malabsorption, and DNA). I procrastinated for a long time about spending that much money for the package, but I've never regretted getting those test results. I only wish I had known that I needed to stop taking digestive enzymes a few days before the malabsorption test to get an accurate result.

Skylark Collaborator

Until Enterolab does what everyone else has to do to validate a diagnostic test, demonstrating good specificity and a low false positive rate, well-trained scientists like myself will keep calling them out.

I keep fighting so hard because I think fecal AGA testing for gluten intolerance is a complete scam. It takes advantage of stressed-out people looking for a lab sheet with a positive result. People spend a bunch of money to get a test that pretty much always comes back positive, even when they are not eating gluten!!! I feel like maybe I can save somebody some wasted $$ and confusion.

Even if you get the full Enterolab panel you don't have a specific celiac test. Fecal fat and TTG come up in other inflammatory bowel diseases and fecal AGA is too prone to false positives (>30%) to act as a useful marker for celiac. It's suggestive but a GI still needs to rule out other diseases unless you get well gluten-free. I think blood deamidated gliadin is a better test because of the 99% specificity and >90% sensitivity.

And Burdee, please understand that I'm not trying to minimize your experiences. We've all gotten shafted by the medical establishment. It's just that you have to be so careful about the alternative stuff. Much of it is malarkey, designed only to separate rubes from their hard-earned money, with just enough science to sound convincing. Enterolab is less shady than many but I just don't quite see them as honest. If they were completely honest, the sensitivity and specificity of the testing would be stated on their website or at least published somewhere. They wouldn't label every gene but DQ4 "gluten sensitive" and they would state alternative diagnoses for tests like TTG.

I really prefer to encourage people to listen to their bodies. I was never even tested but I have no question I have celiac. I even had a blistered rash on my hand that was probably DH.

TJSpin Rookie

There is no validated diagnostic test for gluten sensitivity. We told you that in the other thread; making a new thread will not change the facts. If gluten sensitivity is all you're looking for, you are just wasting money at Cyrex. (They will be happy to tell you otherwise and take your $$ but if you trust them I have a bridge for sale in New York City...)

WOW. New to this forum and really stressed about this situation. Thanks for the support! I wasn't asking about anything I had previously asked about. I was asking if I should wait for the Transglutaminace BEFORE I get the blood test at my docs. I guess I will find another forum to post my questions so I don't offend anyone.

Skylark Collaborator

Try not to label the information we offer as "poo-poo", perhaps?

TJSpin Rookie

There is no validated diagnostic test for gluten sensitivity. We told you that in the other thread; making a new thread will not change the facts. If gluten sensitivity is all you're looking for, you are just wasting money at Cyrex. (They will be happy to tell you otherwise and take your $$ but if you trust them I have a bridge for sale in New York City...)

Oh, and I am aware that there is no test for GS. What I meant is that I probably will not go as far as a biopsy for my 6 year old since those can be false, as well. If I can get "closer" to a positive, then I will be done testing!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



TJSpin Rookie

Try not to label the information we offer as "poo-poo", perhaps?

All I meant is that people dismiss the information. I meant nothing else by the comment and I certainly didn't mean it as a disregard to your opinions! I'm not that kind of person to be that way on a forum post. I was mad when writing because I had just spent money on something that I am now thinking was the wrong choice (that I didn't know at the time of order).

Skylark Collaborator

All I meant is that people dismiss the information. I meant nothing else by the comment and I certainly didn't mean it as a disregard to your opinions! I'm not that kind of person to be that way on a forum post. I was mad when writing because I had just spent money on something that I am now thinking was the wrong choice (that I didn't know at the time of order).

Then I misunderstood. I'm sorry I wrote that. I really was kind of offended but I understand what you meant now. Please don't write off the forum because I was confused. We really value new members and we try hard to help.

You may get some useful info from the Enterolab TTG. I hope so, but above all, please trust your body with the gluten sensitivity.

I looked up the Cyrex panel 3 and it has the serum TTG and deamidated gliadin. You can order from Cyrex if you want but those are standard tests that insurance will cover. The rest of the Cyrex panel would be difficult to interpret as far as celiac disease.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,901
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    tessycork47
    Newest Member
    tessycork47
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.