Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Advice Re Biopsy Please!


CoeliacinSydney

Recommended Posts

CoeliacinSydney Newbie

I'd love some advice here. My youngest son age 10 started becoming symptomatic around Christmas time. I immediately took him for blood tests because my eldest son has been Celiac for four years. Of course his blood were positive.

He went gluten-free straight away and has been so for approximately a month (since the results). He is also having some issues with lactose (although not intolerant) but we are trying to cut back on that until he has healed. His symptoms are improving although he is still getting stomach cramps, but not as many. So my GP has recommended we see a Gastroenterologist for advice. The Gastro has sent me an appointment letter for mid May, saying that he must go off the gluten-free diet TODAY before the appointment and has scheduled a biopsy for the same week. Given that the biopsy for my elder son just confirmed what we already knew (his symptoms were not as bad as what we are going through now with my younger child) and she literally walked out from the theatre and said "yes he has it" and then we were pretty much on our own, I am incredibly reluctant to put him on gluten again.

Has anyone else had a similar dilemma when it comes to biospy? Sooooo frustrating! Why would I want to put him through 2.5 months of hell to get a diagnosis that we already know given it is genetic and his brother has it??? Should I try to find another Gastro who can see us sooner or am I wasting our time and money?

Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

Personally I would not put him through over two months of poisoning to have the doctor tell you what you already know. Plus if he has been gluten-free for a month already he could become seriously ill during the challenge. I would ask your ped why he thinks this is needed when you already have one diagnosed child and your son's blood work is positive.

rosetapper23 Explorer

This is sheer ignorance on the part of that doctor! Celiac expert Dr. Alessio Fasano has stated vehemently that a biopsy is no longer considered the "gold standard" for diagnosing celiac. As a parent, you need to stand up to this ignorance--your child needs to be protected in this instance. Good luck!

mushroom Proficient

I agree with the pp's. The biopsy in your son's case is not necessary, and will only cause him needless suffering. I would eliminate the lactose for your son altogether until he is at least six months gluten free and that may well take care of his stomach cramping. Almond milk, while more expensive, is delicious, and you can give him sherbet instead of ice cream until he is healed. You can also use rice milk although some people have problems with Rice Dream due to their filtration process with barley. But I have used both rice and almond milks (and hemp although I am not sure if it is available in OZ - it is not in NZ) for baking. Also coconut milk is a possibility. I actually gave up lactose before I gave up gluten (not knowing about gluten :rolleyes: ) and it made a big difference. I was, however, able to eat cheese and yogurt since most of the lactose is digested by enzymes and cultures in these prodoucts. The fact that he is lactose intolerant is a pretty good indicator that his biopsy would be positive.

If he is improving on the gluten-free diet (especially with the removal of lactose), you may be able to get a celiac diagnosis from the GI without the biopsy. Best wishes for you and your son.

CoeliacinSydney Newbie

Thank you SO much everyone. I had already decided the biopsy was just cruel, but needed some backing! We've switched to soy milk and he seems alot better. I've just had the gene test so it will be interesting to hear the results, because the blood tests were negative.

mushroom Proficient

It was my understanding from your initial post that his blood tests were positive - perhaps I misunderstood. I believe you said he had been gluten free "since the results". At any rate, I am glad he is doing better. I personally do not recommend soy milk for any gluten intolerants as so many of us have problems with soy as well as gluten. There are many delicious milks like rice, almond, hemp, coconut.......

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,828
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Vernice Hughes
    Newest Member
    Vernice Hughes
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Suze046
      Thanks Scott. Those articles are really interesting. I’m cutting out gluten for 6 weeks but honestly I’m not sure I even want to reintroduce it! I ate at a restaurant for the first time on Wednesday and then Thursday was really uncomfortable and had a few trips to the loo.. wonder if there was some cross contamination 🤷‍♀️ if that’s how my body reacts after not eating it for 3 weeks I’m not sure it’s worth reintroducing it and re testing for celiac! It might have been a coincidence I realise that I’m not going to feel better all of a sudden and my gut is probably still trying to heal. Thanks for your supportive message! 
    • RMJ
      Reference range 0.00 to 10.00 means that within that range is normal, so not celiac. There are other antibodies that can be present in celiac disease and they don’t all have to be positive to have celiac.  I’m sure someone else will post a link to an article describing them! Plus, if you are IgA deficient the celiac IgA tests won’t be accurate.
    • cristiana
      Great to have another UK person on the forum!   Re: blood tests, it sounds as if you are being well monitored but if you have any further concerns about blood tests or anything else, do not hesitate to start a new thread. Cristiana  
    • Lori Lavell
      Julia530 - I have the same gene structure and most of the symptoms you have experienced plus more.....I agree with you whole heartedly!! There are approximately 10 (NOT TWO) genes that can predispose a person to having Celiac Disease. I read in Pub Med that HLA DQA1:05  can result in Celiac Disease in approximately 1 in 875 people. While it is obviously more rare it is NOT BENIGN and should not go unnoticed. Go get the book "NO GRAIN, NO PAIN" and I highly suggest you read it cover to cover. It is written by a Chiropractor who quit his medical education when the VA wouldn't allow him to treat the Veterans with debilitating arthritis with a grain free diet. I have been grain free for over 10 years now.....the facts are we are being lied to! There is a form or gluten in every protein in every grain on the planet of which there are 1000 or more. Just because all they are testing for is the Gliadin in wheat is no excuse to report only partial facts. I became a Certified Function Nutrition Counselor who specializes in Celiac Disease other Autoimmune conditions. Lavell Krueger, CFNC - lavellnutrition    aol
    • lookingforanswersone
      Hi, just looked and it doesn't list that. Says : Tissue Transglutaminase (IgA)  0.30 (results - negative) U/ml (Units ) Reference range 0.00 - 10.00
×
×
  • Create New...