Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Another Request To Help With Test Results


Carrie923

Recommended Posts

Carrie923 Newbie

I've had right side abdominal pain now since March. 2 U/S, CT Scan, Thyroid nuc scan, HIDA Scan (normal) and Endoscopy/Colonoscopy (biopsy results = possible celiac)

Dr then ran Celiac panel and told me results were negative. I'm still having a TON of side pain, now it's up into my ribs and right shoulder blade as well. Hurts to take a deep breath. Hurts to sit certain positions. Just throbbing in my RQ.

GI Dr has now dismissed me. Said she's done everything she can do. I'm so over her and will be requesting another referral. How can she possibly say she's done everything and just leave a patient STILL in abdominal pain!?!??

Can you help with these? I can't make much sense of it. I was gluten-free for 2 weeks prior to this test:

HI Expected

Test Result LO Units Values

------------------------------------------------------------

Celiac Disease Comprehensive Casc

Immunoglobulin A (IgA), S 158 mg/dL 61 - 356

DQ alpha 1 01:02,02:01

-- EXPECTED VALUES --

Not Applicable

DQ beta 1 02:02,06:02

-- EXPECTED VALUES --

Not Applicable

Celiac gene pairs present? Equivocal

Method: Low to Medium or High Resolution Molecular Testing

Celiac Disease Interpretation SEE COMMENTS

Indeterminate for genes associated with celiac disease and

negative serology. Celiac disease very unlikely. However,

patients who are adhering to a gluten-free diet may be

seronegative.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

Your two weeks of gluten-free eating prior to testing undoubtedly had an effect on your test results. See the last sentence of comments. You make normal quantities of IgA. I have no genetic expertise, but it is apparent that you do not have DQ2 or DQ8 which are considered to be the only celiac genes in the U.S. (and are in fact the most common, but there are others recognized elsewhere).

For valid celiac results you would need to go back on a full gluten diet for at least two months and the results may still be negative, meaning you are perhaps non-celiac gluten intolerant. Are you feeling any better off gluten? Did you go off dairy too? (If you are celiac you usually temporarily lose your ability to digest lactose.) You should get a written copy of your biopsy report to see for yourself what it says.

Carrie923 Newbie

Thanks. I feel good for a while and then the pain all comes back. It's seems like it's cyclical, showing up after ovulation. I only have D with relation to fatty foods (chinese, pizza, fast food) but not every time I eat.

Can you still have Celiac if you don't have the genes?

My Biopsy results:

A - Duodenum - celiac:

Duodenal mucosa with normal villous architecture and increased

intraepithelial lymphocytes (SEE NOTE).

NOTE: The morphological findings are etiologically nonspecific and have

been described in patients with latent celiac disease, bacterial

overgrowth, viral gastroenteritis, in association with NSAID use or H.

pylori gastritis, tropical sprue, immunodeficiency syndromes, and more

recently also as a manifestation of duodenal involvement in Crohn's

disease. Clinical and serological correlation is recommended.

B - Gastric - h. pylori:

Gastric antral and fundic gland mucosa with nonspecific reactive

gastropathy. No H. pylori-like microorganism is seen.

C - GE junction 45 - Barrett's:

Squamocolumnar junctional mucosa (cardia type) with chronic nonspecific

inflammation. There is no evidence of intestinal metaplasia.

D - TI - Crohn's:

Ileal mucosa with reactive appearing lymphoid aggregates, consistent

with Peyer's patches.

E - Random colon - microscopic colitis:

Colonic mucosa within normal limits.

Teri Lou Apprentice

I wonder if you could have lymphocytic colitis? Since the lymphocytes are high. I had that initially and was told to avoid fatty foods, dairy and caffeine and it helped for a while....but then I progressed into Celiac (My understanding is lymphocytic colitis is sometimes almost like a precurser type of thing for celiac) So maybe you have something like this going on too (keep in mind I am just guessing and not a medical professional)

Skylark Collaborator

I see the genetic test and total IgA in your results but not the celiac tests. Is there transglutaminase (TTG), gliadin, or endomysial (EMA)?

You don't "not have the genes". You have one copy of DQ2.2 which confers more risk for celiac than people without that gene. It's not a high-risk gene like DQ2.5 or DQ8, which is why your test is labeled equivocal.

Also, what were the biopsy results that lead to the "possible celiac" note?

Carrie923 Newbie

Sorry -

TTG IgA Ab-Mayo Result: <1.2 Standard: <4.0 (Negative) unit/mL

What other blood test should I have done? I'm waiting for a call back from PCP and I can have her order more but I'm confused as to what to ask for.

The only Biopsy result I saw was the one I posted above:

A - Duodenum - celiac:

Duodenal mucosa with normal villous architecture and increased

intraepithelial lymphocytes (SEE NOTE).

NOTE: The morphological findings are etiologically nonspecific and have

been described in patients with latent celiac disease, bacterial

overgrowth, viral gastroenteritis, in association with NSAID use or H.

pylori gastritis, tropical sprue, immunodeficiency syndromes, and more

recently also as a manifestation of duodenal involvement in Crohn's

disease. Clinical and serological correlation is recommended.

Again, should I be asking for more?

Skylark Collaborator

Yes, push for more! Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) can be the first step in developing celiac disease. The IELs are your body's response to intestinal inflammation. Celiac isn't always like flipping a switch. Some people develop it gradually or start with patchy damage, so you can get a biopsy with increased IELs but no autoimmune damage. As your biopsy report mentions, you can get increased IELs for other reasons and it's your doctor's responsibility to rule those out. It's especially important to get H. pylori ruled out because it's so common. She should also be ruling out Crohn's. Tropical sprue is out unless you've been traveling and if you're taking NSAIDs you could try going off them.

If I were you I would definitely ask for deamidated gliadin peptide IgG and IgA and anti-endomysial IgA. If you want to leave no stone unturned, see what your GP thinks of repeating the TTG IgA and adding TTG IgG. Then I would give the diet a good, strict try. That biopsy,your symptoms, plus DQ2.2 is plenty of reason to suspect early stage celiac even with negative blood tests. If you respond well to the diet you have your answer.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  • 1 year later...
NoGrainNoPain Newbie

Glad I read this, it's similar to my biopsy report. Waiting to take the genetic test. 

GottaSki Mentor

Welcome...this thread is older...but does contain great advice.

 

Hang in there and let us know if you have further questions by starting your own thread/topic  :)

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Glad I read this, it's similar to my biopsy report. Waiting to take the genetic test. 

Genetic testing can be part of the diagnostic process but it is not a definate that you don't have celiac if you don't have either of the two most common celiac associated genes. If you do come back negative on the gene test don't let that convince you not to do a gluten free trial when all your celiac related testing is done.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Wends replied to Heatherisle's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      30

      Blood results

    2. - Wends replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      4

      Inconclusive results

    3. - cristiana replied to Leeloff's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      63

      How Come Gluten Didnt Bother Me In Italy

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      4

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,700
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    RelievedP
    Newest Member
    RelievedP
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wends
      Hopefully the biopsy gives a conclusive and correct diagnosis for your daughter. Im in the UK and have been in the situation a few years ago of trying to rule celiac in or out after inconclusive results. Many symptoms pointing to it including the classic symptoms and weight loss and folate and iron deficiency. You have to play a waiting game. I also had the label of IBS and likely food allergy. Genetic test showed low risk for celiac but not no risk. It sounds like the Gastroenterologist is on it and hopefully will diagnose what it is correctly. Food hypersensitivity (allergy) can also cause similar symptoms and inflammation as well as mimicking IBS. Milk / dairy and wheat (cereal grains) being the biggest culprits. The “oesophagitis” and “gastritis” you mentioned can be caused by another gastrointestinal disorder called “eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders”. These are named depending on which part of the gastrointestinal tract is affected. For example eosinophilic oesophagitis, eosinophilic gastritis, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, and more rare eosinophilic colitis. They are antigen (allergen) driven. When the blood test measuring anti-ttg antibodies is positive in absence of a positive ema test - which is more specific to celiac, this can also suggest food hypersensitivity (allergy). Usually delayed type allergy similar to celiac but not autoimmune if that makes sense. In this case the ttg antibodies are transient. Which happens. I’ve first hand experience. For info, evidence of villous atrophy too can be caused by food hypersensitivity. Not just by celiac disease. In Egid disorders the six food elimination diet, under a dietitian and gastroenterologist care, is the dietary protocol to figure out the culprit or culprits. Sometimes only two food elimination diet is used at first. The number one culprit is milk protein / dairy. Followed by wheat, eggs, soy, fish and seafood, and nuts. Most are only reactive to one food group or two. Most are only reactive to milk. Hope this is a helpful reply.
    • Bennyboy1998
      Yes gene HLADQ2 was positive 
    • Wends
      Wow, the system is crazy isn’t it? Maybe switch Doctors if you can. It’s surprising from what you’ve written it seems obvious it’s celiac disease. The “potential” diagnosis means celiac is developing and it basically just hasn’t done enough gut damage to be captured on the biopsy yet, and meet that “criteria” to satisfy the current system! Given the overwhelming evidence already - family history, positive ttg and ema. And your own experience and intuition which counts far more. And the labs being reproduced after gluten elimination and reintroduction- elimination and reintroduction diet is the gold standard too. Shame on the Doc and the system. What was the Marsh score? I’m guessing not 0 if it’s potential celiac. Meaning the autoimmune process has been triggered and started. Your daughter is obviously very healthy and her immune system is putting up a good fight. It can take years for the gut damage to build to a point where there’s overt symptoms and then a conclusive diagnosis, hence why many celiacs receive diagnosis later in life. You can prevent it. See the positive and the gift in that. Hopefully the gluten challenge confirms it, but if it doesn’t maybe get a second opinion?
    • cristiana
      @Gigi2025  Thank you for your interesting post.  Some of what you say chimes with something my gastroenterologist tells me - that he has clients who travel to France and find the same as you  - they will eat normal wheat baguette there without issue, for example.  His theory was he thought it might be to do with the locally sourced wheat being different to our own in the UK? But I have to say my own experience has been quite different. I have been to France twice since my diagnosis, and have been quite ill due to what was then (pre-2019)  poor labelling and cross-contamination issues.  My TTG test following my last visit was elevated - 'proof of the pudding', as we say in the UK!  It was not just a case of eating something like, say, shellfish, that disagreed with me - gluten was clearly an issue. I've also been to Italy to visit family a couple of times since my diagnosis.  I did not want to take any chances so kept to my gluten free diet, but whilst there what I did notice is that coeliacs are very well catered for in Italy, and many brands with the same ingredients in the UK are clearly marked on the front of their packaging that they are 'senza glutine'.  In the UK, you would have to find that information in the small print - or it puts people off buying it, so I am told!  So it seems to me the Italians are very coeliac aware - in fact, all children are, I believe, screened for coeliac disease at the age of 6.  That must mean, I guess, that many Italian coeliacs are actively avoiding gluten because, presumably, if they don't, they will fall ill?        
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you both very much. I’m pretty familiar with the various tests, and my older two girls with official dxs have even participated in research on other tests as well. I just felt overwhelmed and shocked that these recent results (which I found pretty dang conclusive after having scott clean labs just six months ago) would still be considered inconclusive. Doc said we could biopsy in another six weeks because my daughter was actually way more upset than I anticipated about the idea of eating it for years before doing another biopsy. It doesn’t hurt her, but she’s afraid of how it may be hurting her in ways she can’t feel. She’s currently eating mini wheats for breakfast, a sandwich with lunch, and a side of pasta along with every dinner, so I’m hoping we’re meeting that 10g benchmark mentioned in that second article!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.