Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is Deaminated Gliadin Iga Of 45 (0-19) A Yes Or No?


ksue12

Recommended Posts

ksue12 Newbie

I had that test result two years ago, and at the same time was told I did NOT have celiac because the other tests that more specifically represent celiac were negative, along with my biopsy results. Any thoughts?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

Welcome, ksue.

The DGP (deamidated gliadin protein) is the newest test for gluten sensitivity and is considered to be the most specific for celiac disease. You do not have to test positive on all the tests - that is why they run the entire panel. Your DGP was a definite positive.

Your negative biopsy could be due to your doctor not taking enough samples, taking them from the wrong place, or the pathologist not being experienced in reading celiac slides. Do you still have (or can you get) a copy of the pathologist's report and tell us what it said? Sometimes doctors are not very experienced in reading these and don't know what signs to look for. You could have been in the early stages of damage.

GFinDC Veteran

Yep, one positive blood test is all it takes.

ksue12 Newbie

Thanks for both of your replies!

Mushroom, so does this mean I most likely have celiac or gluten intolerance? And, I could not find the results of the biopsy. I think it was in my online chart, but for some reason I can't find it anymore. All I saw on the paper that they handed me when I finished the endoscopy was that some samples were taken from the "postbulbar duodenum", but that the duodenum looked normal during the scope.

nvsmom Community Regular

Welcome ksue. :)

Whoever told you you were not a celiac was mistaken. :( Unlike celiac disease, there is no test that will indicate non-celiac gluten intolerance (NCGI). This food sensitivity is diagnosed by how well you respond to a gluten-free diet. NCGI sufferers will have the same symptoms as celiacs but they will not have the intestinal damage. Your positive test indicates celiac (as far as I can remember).

The duodenum is the upper part of the small intestine where celiac damage usually occurs so they were looking in the correct spot. This damage may or may not be visable during the scope; the biopsy samples often need to be checked under magnification to see the damage. That damage is often spotty so if a small nummber of samples was taken, it could have been missed... sounds like it was.

Good luck with the diet change. There are many helpful people around here to give good advice, look around and ask questions. :) Best wishes.

GottaSki Mentor

Welcome!

I'd add that it is time for another full celiac panel. If you haven't removed gluten at all, you may now have more positive tests.

Good luck to you :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. 0

      Penobscot Bay, Maine: Nurturing Gluten-Free Wellness Retreat with expert celiac dietitian, Melinda Dennis

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    3. - Jane02 replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,327
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    dnamutant
    Newest Member
    dnamutant
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I do not know this, but since they are labelled gluten-free, and are not really a product that could easily be contaminated when making them (there would be not flour in the air of such a facility, for example), I don't really see contamination as something to be concerned about for this type of product. 
    • trents
    • Jane02
      Thanks @Scott Adams. Do you know if Kirkland Signature supplements share facility and production lines with other products containing gluten?  I'm worried that I'll react to this brand just like I did with other gluten-free labelled supplement brands. 
    • Matthias
    • Scott Adams
      This is a really common area of confusion. Most natural cheeses (cheddar, Swiss, mozzarella, Parmesan, brie, camembert, and most blue cheeses) are inherently gluten-free, and you’re right that the molds used today are typically grown on gluten-free media. The bigger risks tend to come from processed cheeses: shredded cheese (anti-caking agents), cheese spreads, beer-washed rinds, smoke-flavored cheeses, and anything with added seasonings or “natural flavors,” where cross-contact can happen. As for yeast, you’re also correct — yeast itself is gluten-free. The issue is the source: brewer’s yeast and yeast extracts can be derived from barley unless labeled gluten-free, while baker’s yeast is generally safe. When in doubt, sticking with whole, unprocessed cheeses and products specifically labeled gluten-free is the safest approach, especially if you’re highly sensitive.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.