Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Will An Endoscopy Show Physical Evidence Of Celiac?


jwblue

Recommended Posts

jwblue Apprentice

Will an endoscopy show evidence of Celiac or does the doctor need to take a specimen for lab testing?

I have had two endoscopies for other digestive disorders and am disappointed that the doctor didn't suggest I be tested for Celiac.

Why not since he is down there already?

Now I have to have an endoscopy just for Celiac.

Is it possible the doctor did not see any physical evidence of Celiac and decided a lab test was not necessary?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Takala Enthusiast

Yes, it's possible they didn't see it. It may not be visible to the naked eye or the damage can be patchy, and they did not look in an area which had the damage closely enough. For celiac, they are supposed to look in the area where the stomach and intestines meet, the duodenum. They are supposed to take enough samples for biopsy that they get a good representation of the status of the area.

Open Original Shared Link

Skysmom03 Newbie

It also may not have been something they were looking for at the time. It can't be diagnosed with the naked eye.

psawyer Proficient

Is it possible the doctor did not see any physical evidence of Celiac and decided a lab test was not necessary?

In a word, yes. Only in severe cases is the damage visible to the naked eye. Usually it is not. Marsh I and II are not visible, but are definitive diagnostics. You have to be well into the March III stages before it may be visible. Marsh IV is total destruction of the villi and will be visible to a trained eye (been there).

jwblue Apprentice

In a word, yes. Only in severe cases is the damage visible to the naked eye. Usually it is not. Marsh I and II are not visible, but are definitive diagnostics. You have to be well into the March III stages before it may be visible. Marsh IV is total destruction of the villi and will be visible to a trained eye (been there).

Did you have any symptoms with Marsh IV?

1desperateladysaved Proficient

Did you have any symptoms with Marsh IV?

Additional questions for PSawyer :

Did it heal well?

How long did you have symptoms?

psawyer Proficient

I had severe symptoms for years prior to my diagnosis: diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, cold sweats, anemia, and others.

I saw a significant improvement within six weeks, but it was more like six months to feel normal. A follow-up five years later showed normal villi. In other words, complete healing of the intestine on a strict gluten-free diet.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Celiac Mindwarp Community Regular

Peter

What amazing healing. It is so great to hear others stories. No wonder you are such a good advocate :)

love2travel Mentor

Are you talking endoscopy or colonoscopy?? Two different things, two different ends. :)

SMDBill Apprentice

I just had my endoscopy yesterday and one of the questions I asked in advance was whether damage would be visible or not. He said most times the damage is only microscopic so they do their best to determine where to sample/biopsy and they use multiple locations just for that reason. Mine was ugly. I had many visible spots on the printout of some photos he took while in there and for now he just diagnosed as erosive gastritis for the damage to my stomach lining (way too much ibuprofen over the last few years - daily - due to celiac-induced headaches) and duodenitis for the damage seen to the intestine/duodenem (sp?).

He was surprised to see so much damage visibly, but even invisible damage is of great concern so either way it is important that they take multiple samples.

Edit: Of note to anyone who reads this and has not been diagnosed, I've been gluten free for 2 months now and my endoscopy results were still very visible. Not everyone will see the same results, obviously, but any doubters can rest assured that even if you are gluten free for some time, they may still be able to medically diagnose you accurately from the endoscopy. I don't have blood results back yet, but he seems certain they'll also agree with the endoscopy just due to the severity of the damage. Moral of the story...if you want to know and have self-diagnosed recently...GO GET TESTED! You may be pleased to have a medical confirmation and a plan to heal your blood, bone, thyroid or whatever issues you have that need more than supplements and gluten-free diet.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Judy Wysocki commented on Scott Adams's article in Cookies
      2

      Gluten-Free Cranberry Pistachio Snowball Cookies

    2. - Scott Adams replied to JoJo0611's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      CT with contrast.

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Shellly's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      New labs are now very elevated


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,201
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Judy Wysocki
    Newest Member
    Judy Wysocki
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
    • trents
      @JettaGirl, "Coeliac" is the British spelling of "celiac". Same disease. 
    • JettaGirl
      This may sound ridiculous but is this supposed to say Celiacs? I looked up Coeliacs because you never know, there’s a lot of diseases related to a disease that they come up with similar names for. It’s probably meant to say Celiacs but I just wanted to confirm.
    • JoJo0611
      I was told it was to see how much damage has been caused. But just told CT with contrast not any other name for it. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.