Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

New Fda Gluten Free Label Law Questions
0

4 posts in this topic

Hi Everyone,

I had asked a couple of questions regarding the new US FDA Labeling Laws in another post, and one of the wonderful moderators mentioned that a lot of people have questions about it, and suggested I should start a new topic to open the subject up for discussion.

My questions were:

When will the new law for gluten free food labeling go in to effect?

What exactly will the new law mean as far as testing for gluten in the finished product goes?

Will manufacturers have to disclose if the facility or equipment is shared under the new law? (From what I understand, this is voluntary right now)

From what I could find online, it looks like the "Rule" (they are not calling it a law), went in to effect in August of 2013, but they gave manufacturers a year to meet the deadline for compliance, which is August of 2014 (very soon!).

It also appears that the FDA is not requiring manufacturers to test their finished products before labeling them gluten free. The FDA would have the authority to monitor a product that has been reported as possibly containing gluten. It looks like it will be very important for us to report products that we believe are in violation of this rule to make it work for us.

I didn't see any information regarding whether or not a manufacturer will be required to disclose if their facility or equipment is shared under the new rule. This is very important information and it would do us a great service if they were required to state their equipment was shared. Does anyone know if that will be happening?

If anyone has any additional information or questions they would like to share, please do.

I know some of you go to seminars, etc, and have a much better understanding of the new rule than myself.

Here are some helpful links I was able to find regarding the rule:

http://www.fda.gov/food/guidanceregulation/guidancedocumentsregulatoryinformation/allergens/ucm362880.htm

http://celiac.org/blog/2013/10/14/fda-gluten-free-food-labeling-information-page/

http://health.usnews.com/health-news/blogs/eat-run/2013/08/06/making-sense-of-the-fdas-new-gluten-free-labeling-law

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

If you like reading FDA documents here is a link to more on this subject (I work in an FDA-regulated industry and am used to reading their rules).

http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/Allergens/ucm362510.htm

To answer some specific questions:

Manufacturers do not have to test their products - they can use other methods to ensure they are below 20ppm gluten (using naturally gluten-free ingredients, using ingredients that suppliers have tested, etc)

Manufacturers do NOT have to disclose that they have shared facilities or shared equipment.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My questions were:

When will the new law for gluten free food labeling go in to effect?

What exactly will the new law mean as far as testing for gluten in the finished product goes?

Will manufacturers have to disclose if the facility or equipment is shared under the new law? (From what I understand, this is voluntary right now)

 

 

 

I believe August of this year.

 

They are not required to test anything.

 

Shared equipment is and will remain voluntary.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the status of "no gluten ingredients" claims? I seem to be finding conflicting information about that phrasing. At first I read the rules to mean that any form of a "no gluten" claim had to meet the new guidelines of less than 20ppm. But upon further reading it started to sound like "no gluten ingredients used" could still be used - as long as the claim is truthful - without being expected to meet the 20ppm standard unless the label also makes a "gluten free" claim. For instance, the two links below (same links as in other posters' comments) seem to contradict each other. Or am I just reading it wrong? 

 

http://www.fda.gov/Food/ResourcesForYou/Consumers/ucm367654.htm

 

Compare to question #21 of this FAQ link:

http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/Allergens/ucm362880.htm

 

Many Trader Joe's products, for instance, have no gluten ingredients but are made on shared equipment. I understand that the law does not require shared equipment to be disclosed, but if these products make a "no gluten ingredients" claim but are not labeled "gluten free", will they be held to the 20ppm standard (after August)? 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,125
    • Total Posts
      919,500
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am so confused right now.... 6 years ago I went on gluten free diet... after being on it for the first yr I was 100%better up until 5 months ago in got the "flu" the doctors told me to cut out dairy sonic did and my diarrhea  became better but not completely gone would not have it every day tho. I went to the gi doctor and they said to cut out fructose and dairy and keep gluten out... yesterday I went to the dietitian to see what I can eat and she gave me the list for fructose... she said it should have been on a antibiotic for sibo.... eventually I will be able to add dairy back and maybe gluten.... I said how can I add gluten back when this was my first problem... she goes well through fructose goes hand in hand with it... I said with gluten I vomit and am sick for weeks.... fructose isn't that bad I vomit sometimes but I'm not sick for weeks.... I'm just confused on really what is going on and was wondering if you or someone you know had sibo from gluten and or fructose and how Is this all related?
    • I see no one has responded to your query.  Unfortunately I have yet to try making a pie crust.  It was something I never mastered before going gluten free.  Have you looked on Pinterest?  You might find something there.
    • I honestly feel like both doctors think it's all in my head even though there is proof.  Yeah there was a point when I felt crazy.  That was when I was being shuffled from dr to dr being given individual diagnoses of my problems.  None of those diagnoses ever made me get better.  Seriously I was diagnosed with heart palpitations, neurocardiogenic syncope, I was given a butt load of steroids because a dr felt like I was producing too much adrenaline, freaking had a few tell me I was depressed, and the good ol IBS.  It seemed most wanted to push pills.  It's all just ridiculous!
    • I can't believe your doctors!!! You have a daughter who is dx'd already! Yet the ped doesn't want to test your other kids unless you have a dx????!!! Are you kidding me???!!! That's absurd!!! They have a first degree relative who has been dx'd with celiac already. There is no need to wait to see what you turn out to be!! And then, and then, and then....don't even get me started on your doctor!!! Does he have brain damage? Oh this is insane & ridiculous!  I have never heard of a disease that doctors are so unwilling to consider or test for OR to diagnose as this one! Usually they are hot to trot to make a dx but say the word celiac & they shake in their boots. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • I had a negative biopsy and was still diagnosed with Celiac. My GI ran a bunch of tests looking for the cause of my 15+ years of diarrhea and the only thing that came back positive was the entire Celiac panel. All very high. So he performed an endoscopy with biopsy. The biopsy was negative. So he ordered a genetic test. When that came back as "high risk" he decided a trial gluten free diet was in order. After 8 weeks my symptoms resolved and my antibodies were back to normal. Since then, follow up testing had shown I have osteoporosis. I am a 40 year old male.  So yes, you can definitely still have it and have significant damage with a negative biopsy. 
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,161
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    Jashan8534
    Joined