Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Are Normal Iga And Igg Levels?


heliosue

Recommended Posts

heliosue Apprentice

Still trying to pin down whether I have Celiac Disease or Non-Celiac Gluten Intolerence. Based on a suggestion from a forum member, I just had my IGA total serum test and won't know the results for awhile.  But.. I have a question about normal levels based on the descriptions that I have read in a few online articles. The articles offer several possible outcomes if the total IGA is low, and the rest of the antibody tests are "normal".  Where can I go to find out what is "normal" on these other tests.  Is it "no antibodies detected"? Is it any result that falls below the upper range?  I have a feeling that the result of this latest test is going to continue to place me in the inconclusive category, as the ONLY positive on the previous tests was the TTG Antibody, IGG, which was at 10 (high according to the report). (Does anyone know what the high range is for that TTG, IGG test?  Is it 10 out of 100? or 10 out of 1000?) The previous tests were taken when I was eating a partially gluten free diet. (I hadn't been told that a Celiac/Gluten panel was going to done as part of my broader annual bloodwork), so I'm not at all sure those negative results mean much.  I feel so much better now that I'm gluten-free, that I really don't know if I can make myself go back to eating gluten in order to verify the previous test results or even go the biopsy route.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Brit1612 Apprentice

I think each lab can be different, but for example, my son's ttg igg was "slightly elevated" the first time he had it done and it was a 7, the second time it was a 15 (clear positive) and the last time is was .5 (negative).  The range for all of these labs was <6 was considered "normal", Between 6 and 8 was like a mild positive and >8 was positive.  So if your lab was the same your result would have been a clear positive for that test.  Just so you know, my son had that test positive with others negative and we just had a negative biopsy.  He also came back negative for the same test (while consuming gluten).  We are being told that it could have been some kind of infection causing the positive, and now that it is negative we are being told not to worry but to trust the results we are getting now (including the biopsy).  Just thought I would share.

nvsmom Community Regular

Yes.  Lab normal ranges can vary quite a bit.  I've seen from 0-4 up to 0-20.  My lab range was the 0-20, and everything above a 20 was considered high.  If you have 19.8, you are not a celiac but 20.2 probably is.   :rolleyes:   My result was stated at greater than 200 so I have no idea what it actually was - could have been 201 or 1000.  ;)

 

The normal range usually starts at 0 though.  If your 10 was high, your upper normal limit was probably 4, 5, or 6.  Perhaps you can request a copy of the lab report and then you'll know for sure.

 

If you want to stay gluten-free yet want to verify your diagnosis, try retesting after 6 months.  If your result has come down, it probably was celiac disease.... A positive test result means it is probably celiac disease anyways.  Those tests are pretty specific to celiac disease. This report shows that the specificity of a positive for celiac disease for the tTG IgG (SP) is about 95%. Open Original Shared Link

 

Best wishes.

heliosue Apprentice

I think each lab can be different, but for example, my son's ttg igg was "slightly elevated" the first time he had it done and it was a 7, the second time it was a 15 (clear positive) and the last time is was .5 (negative).  The range for all of these labs was <6 was considered "normal", Between 6 and 8 was like a mild positive and >8 was positive.  So if your lab was the same your result would have been a clear positive for that test.  Just so you know, my son had that test positive with others negative and we just had a negative biopsy.  He also came back negative for the same test (while consuming gluten).  We are being told that it could have been some kind of infection causing the positive, and now that it is negative we are being told not to worry but to trust the results we are getting now (including the biopsy).  Just thought I would share.

Thanks for sharing your son's experience.  Talk about a roller coaster ride! It really is frustrating not being able to pin things down, even more so for you when it's your son you're worrying about.  Thanks again, I'll keep this information in mind.

heliosue Apprentice

Yes.  Lab normal ranges can vary quite a bit.  I've seen from 0-4 up to 0-20.  My lab range was the 0-20, and everything above a 20 was considered high.  If you have 19.8, you are not a celiac but 20.2 probably is.   :rolleyes:   My result was stated at greater than 200 so I have no idea what it actually was - could have been 201 or 1000.   ;)

 

The normal range usually starts at 0 though.  If your 10 was high, your upper normal limit was probably 4, 5, or 6.  Perhaps you can request a copy of the lab report and then you'll know for sure.

 

If you want to stay gluten-free yet want to verify your diagnosis, try retesting after 6 months.  If your result has come down, it probably was celiac disease.... A positive test result means it is probably celiac disease anyways.  Those tests are pretty specific to celiac disease. This report shows that the specificity of a positive for celiac disease for the tTG IgG (SP) is about 95%. Open Original Shared Link

 

Best wishes.

Thanks. I just read the page you linked to and copied it into my Celiac file.  My doctor (internist) doesn't seem to think that it's important that I know one way or the other, but I do think that I should let nieces and brother know if it is Celiac.  He said that  a 10 on the TTG, IgG was borderline, but he couldn't tell me what the benchmarks were in upper range.  Also, I had to remind him that my blood labs a year ago showed that I was low in iron, B-12, and folic acid and he had me taking supplments for each. Six months ago, my dentist asked what I was doing that caused me to be losing enamel on my teeth. I had no idea. So many of the possible symptoms can be symptoms for myriad other illnesses. Thanks for mentioning taking the Celiac panel again in 6 months. It hadn't occurred to me that if the antibody count decreased that that would be a good indication of celiac disease.  From my perspective that is so much more preferable to eating gluten again for any length of time.  Thanks again for your help.  It really does ease my mind to know that there are folks like those in this forum who can relate and answer questions for me.

nvsmom Community Regular

I think most people around here can relate to your struggle.  Those who had a stomach ache for a month, were diagnosed with clear results, and trained on the gluten-free diet, aren't the ones who come here... Sadly, we are the majority of celiacs.  ;)

Brit1612 Apprentice

Thanks for sharing your son's experience.  Talk about a roller coaster ride! It really is frustrating not being able to pin things down, even more so for you when it's your son you're worrying about.  Thanks again, I'll keep this information in mind.

You're right it is really frustrating when it is happening to your child, especially a child that can't even talk.  I can't ask him how are you feeling, or explain to him the things he's been having to go through.  But I am still grateful for his health; I know there are parents out there dealing with life threatening illness in their children, so I try to keep it in perspective.  Hope you get answers quicker and easier than we have!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Haugeabs replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      23

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    2. - trents replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      FDA looking for input on Celiac Gluten sensitivity labeling PLEASE READ and submit your suggestions

    3. - Wheatwacked replied to Heatherisle's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      34

      Blood results

    4. - Known1 replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      FDA looking for input on Celiac Gluten sensitivity labeling PLEASE READ and submit your suggestions

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,414
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Donna Shields
    Newest Member
    Donna Shields
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Haugeabs
      For my Vit D3 deficiency it was recommended to take with Vit K2 (MK7) with the Vit D. The Vit K2 helps absorption of Vit D3. Fat also helps with absorption. I take Micro Ingredients Vit D3 5000 IU with Vit K2 100 micrograms (as menaquinone:MK-7). Comes in soft gels with coconut oil.  Gluten free but not certified gluten free. Soy free, GMO free.   
    • trents
      @Known1, I submitted the following comment along with my contact information: "I have noticed that many food companies voluntarily include information in their ingredient/allergen label section when the product is made in an environment where cross contamination with any of the nine major allergens recognized by the FDA may also be likely. Even though celiac disease and gluten sensitivity are, technically speaking, not allergic responses, it would seem, nonetheless, appropriate to include "gluten" in that list for the present purpose. That would insure that food companies would be consistent with including this information in labeling. Best estimates are that 1% of the general population, many undiagnosed of course, have celiac disease and more than that are gluten sensitive."
    • Wheatwacked
    • Wheatwacked
      Celiac Disease causes more vitamin D deficiency than the general population because of limited UV sunlight in the winter and the little available from food is not absorbed well in the damaged small intestine.  Taking 10,000 IU a day (250 mcg) a day broke my depression. Taking it for eleven years.  Doctor recently said to not stop.  My 25(OH)D is around 200 nmol/L (80 ng/ml) but it took about six years to get there.  Increasing vitamin D also increases absorption of Calcium. A good start is 100-gram (3.5-ounce) serving of salmon,  vitamin D from 7.5 to 25 mcg (300 to 1,000 IU) but it is going to take additional vitamin D supplement to be effective.  More importantly salmon has an omega-6 to omega-3 ratio 1:10 anti-inflammatory compared to the 15:1 infammatory ratio of the typical Western diet. Vitamin D and Depression: Where is all the Sunshine?
    • Known1
      Thank you for sharing your thoughts.  I respectfully disagree.  You cherry picked a small section from the page.  I will do the same below: The agency is seeking information on adverse reactions due to “ingredients of interest” (i.e., non-wheat gluten containing grains (GCGs) which are rye and barley, and oats due to cross-contact with GCGs) and on labeling issues or concerns with identifying these “ingredients of interest” on packaged food products in the U.S. “People with celiac disease or gluten sensitives have had to tiptoe around food, and are often forced to guess about their food options,” said FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, M.D., M.P.H. “We encourage all stakeholders to share their experiences and data to help us develop policies that will better protect Americans and support healthy food choices.” --- end quote Anyone with celiac disease is clearly a stakeholder.  The FDA is encouraging us to share our experiences along with any data to help develop future "policies that will better protect Americans and support healthy food choices".  I see this as our chance to speak up or forever hold our peace.  Like those that do not participate in elections, they are not allowed to complain.  The way I see it, if we do not participate in this request for public comment/feedback, then we should also not complain when we get ill from something labeled gluten-free. Have a blessed day ahead, Known1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.