Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Enterolab Accuracy


JustMe75

Recommended Posts

JustMe75 Enthusiast

Does anyone know how accurate Enterolab results are? I see everyone on here talk pretty highly about them, but I am concerned that everyone seems to test positive. Does everyone with stomach problems test positive because our bodies are reacting to something we eat or is it truly a gluten reaction? I am skeptical about everything not just this. I was about to place my order for the test and thought I'd see if anyone knew how accurate the test is. Also, which test(s) should I order?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



AndreaB Contributor

I had the whole test panel ordered for my family. If you want to save money just get the gene test and try the diet. If you want something on paper (email) then order the full panel (I think it's $250-$350). I forget the exact amount. It includes the gene test.

I think they are pretty accurate as far as your body's responses. If you have underlying problems causing the intolerances it wouldn't tell you that. (ie, metals, fungal issues, lyme etc)

My family's intolerances are more than likely due to metals. We all have celiac genes so we will in no way be going back to a gluten diet.

mftnchn Explorer

There have been people here who have posted negative results, and your question about this has been asked before here on the forum. You might do a search and see.

I think it is pretty reliable after looking up Dr. Fine's background and record, and reading another poster's comments who works in a laboratory and looked over the whole thing. I think it is important to realize that they pick up sensitivity to gluten and other things they test for, but don't diagnose the cause (such as celiac).

This is the test I had, and I am still on the recovery process, but I think it is proving true.

EBsMom Apprentice
Does anyone know how accurate Enterolab results are?

Well....it's only anecdotal evidence, but in our case, they seemed to be accurate. Everything the tests "said" was supported by what we saw IRL. My dd was getting very sick, with horrible reflux, gas, bloating, D, decreased energy, pallor, dark circles under her eyes. Her pedi wasn't taking it all that seriously....just wanted to put her on meds for the reflux. On the suggestion of a friend, whose child has celiac disease, we eliminated gluten from her diet. She started to improve immediately. A week later (on suggestion of the same friend) I sent for the Enterolab test. Before the results even came back, we figured out that she was having problems with dairy and eliminated that from her diet as well. Then the results came back positive across the board - she's intolerant of gluten/casein, had an elevated fecal tTg and high fecal fat. Those results only supported what we were seeing with our own eyes.

Later, my ds and I were tested also. I never had major symptoms - lots of vague ones - and my ds's symptoms were all neurological. We both tested positive as well (though not with numbers as high as my dd's.) Both of us are doing so much better off the gluten (and off the casein for me) that it's made a believer out of me. When I get accidentally glutened, I have awful stomach pains, head fog, irratability and C that lasts for several days. As I said before - the Enterolab results bear out what we're seeing and living IRL. That's my only "proof" that the Enterolab tests are accurate.

Rho

hathor Contributor

This is what Dr. Fine has written:

Open Original Shared Link

We keep hoping he will publish. Perhaps he is doing long term followup on his patients, is busy, or is dealing with medical journals that have difficulty publishing things that aren't in the regular medical paradigm. (For instance, I just learned about the difficulty getting published that was experienced by the researchers who found that mammograms didn't affect mortality. No one in the US would publish it. So they went to the Lancet finally, which had no problem with the study.)

There are people who test negative. I think we hear more about those who test positive because they are the ones that continue on posting on this board B)

The fact is, you have to look at your alternatives. Blood testing has a rather significant rate of false negatives, plus you have to have been eating gluten for some time for them to be meaningful.

People report here having positive test results, avoiding gluten, and feeling better. I'm another one in that category. Would I prefer to have a diagnosis based upon a test supported by peer-reviewed and replicated research? Yes. But I also want to be well and have to take what is out there now. Given my genes, many doctors would say that I can't have a problem with gluten to begin with, but my body begs to differ.

Puffin Newbie

I had my doubts about the test and the low scores I received but the improvements in my life after finding all my food intolerances has been dramatic. Gluten being the most severe.

I believe elimination of gluten for at least 4 weeks will confirm Enterolab results.

The person who mentored me is the President of the Montana Celiac society; she told me that the diet would be the best test.

I needed more so I did Enterolab and waited seven weeks to start the diet until I got the results back; in retrospect I suffered needlessly and should have started the diet immediately after sending in my test. I went through 8 days of withdrawal and on the 9th day started feeling better.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - knitty kitty replied to Mihai's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      24

      Pain in the right side of abdomen

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Mihai's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      24

      Pain in the right side of abdomen

    3. - Heatherisle replied to Mihai's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      24

      Pain in the right side of abdomen

    4. - Heatherisle replied to Mihai's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      24

      Pain in the right side of abdomen

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,668
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Hope Durbin
    Newest Member
    Hope Durbin
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      It's important to correct the B12 deficiency first, replenishing the stores of B12 in the body within organs and tissues.    As more B12 becomes available, the body will adjust how much folate to absorb from the diet.  Dietary folate sources include leafy greens, broccoli, and Brussels sprouts, and liver.  (Avoid spinach due to high oxalates and risk of kidney stone formation.). Folate level should be checked in future just in case Celiac malabsorption affects it.   Thiamine deficiency can be found with B12 deficiency.  B12, Pyridoxine B6, and Thiamine B1 all are involved with nerve health and nerve transmission.  These three vitamins together to improve nerve health better than just one of them alone.  They relieve neuropathy and pain, and improve brain function.  You're being an amazing mom for advocating for your daughter's health!  Hurrah! Interesting Reading: B Vitamins in the nervous system: Current knowledge of the biochemical modes of action and synergies of thiamine, pyridoxine, and cobalamin https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6930825/ Concomitant Vitamin B1 and Vitamin B12 Deficiency Mimicking Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9887457/ Thiamin metabolism in vitamin B6 or vitamin B12 deficient rats https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/859042/ B Vitamin Deficiencies and Associated Neuropathies https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12855320/#:~:text=The neurotropic B vitamins -B1,neuropathies [3%2C 4].
    • Scott Adams
      Vitamin B9 (Folate): The UL for Folic Acid is set at 1,000 mcg (1 mg) per day for adults. This limit primarily applies to synthetic folic acid found in supplements and fortified foods, not naturally occurring folate in food. High intake of folic acid can mask the symptoms of Vitamin B12 deficiency, which can lead to neurological damage if left untreated. This is because folic acid supplementation can correct anemia caused by B12 deficiency without addressing the underlying neurological damage. Some studies suggest that excessive folic acid intake might increase the risk of certain cancers, such as colorectal cancer, particularly in individuals who have precancerous lesions.
    • Heatherisle
      Hasn’t been given folic acid as GP says vit b and folic acid can’t be given together which I find strange cos any time I did venepunctures B12 and folate were always grouped together? Her folate level was 2.2, just below the normal level
    • Heatherisle
      Hi Thanks for your input. Don’t know which exact medication she’s on, keep asking but she keeps forgetting!!! I still think her Vitamin D levels might be low cos she had the back pain and tingling last year( around March /April) and levels were low so she had 3 month course then and it helped. She’s coming home next week (as in to ours) for a long weekend so hopefully some TLC from mum and dad will help!!!    
    • Scott Adams
      Genetic testing for celiac disease (the HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 genes) usually takes about 3–10 days to come back, depending on the lab your doctor uses, though some places may take up to two weeks. The test itself doesn’t diagnose celiac disease—it only shows whether you carry the genes that make celiac possible. About 30–40% of people have one of these genes, but only a small percentage actually develop celiac disease. However, if the test is negative for both genes, celiac disease becomes extremely unlikely, which is why your doctor mentioned possibly canceling the endoscopy if the result is negative. If it’s positive, it just means celiac remains a possibility and further testing, like a gluten challenge followed by endoscopy, helps confirm it. Since you have an identical twin, it’s definitely useful information to share if the genes are present, because twins share the same genetic risk. It sounds like you found a very thorough GI doctor, which is great, especially since she’s also monitoring nutrients and looking at the whole picture.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.