Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Record is Archived

    This article is now archived and is closed to further replies.

    Destiny Stone
    Destiny Stone

    Is Intestinal Biopsy Avoidable in Diagnosing Celiac Disease?

    Reviewed and edited by a celiac disease expert.
    Is Intestinal Biopsy Avoidable in Diagnosing Celiac Disease? - Photo: CC/jinglejammer
    Caption: Photo: CC/jinglejammer

    Celiac.com 07/14/2010 - Intestinal biopsy is considered the the gold standard for celiac disease testing. However, biopsy is an  invasive procedure and most people would be happy to avoid biopsy all together. Based solely on serology, a new diagnostic standard  has been proposed that would no longer require intestinal biopsy for celiac disease diagnosis in some patients.

    Researchers performed duodenal biopsy and serology in six-hundred and seventy-nine adults who were at high risk and low risk for celiac disease. They tested blood samples  to detect antibodies to tissue transglutaminase (tTG) and deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP). The goal of researchers was to establish the diagnostic performance of various serological tests for diagnosing celiac disease in patients with varying pretest results. In this study, they hope to find potential serological algorithms to decrease the requirement for biopsy.

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A12):
    One-hundred and sixty-one consecutive adults with undiagnosed, but suspected intestinal disorders were selected as the high-risk group to be evaluated for celiac disease. Five-hundred and eighteen patients who had been referred for routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy due to non-specific symptoms such as indigestion, were randomly selected for the low-risk group.

    Prevalence of celiac disease was found in 39.1% of the high-risk group, and 3.3% of the low-risk group. Of the  high-risk patients, all individual assays demonstrated a high diagnostic efficacy, while the low-risk group demonstrated a lower diagnostic efficacy.

    The serological findings of this study demonstrated that the algorithm used for individual assays allows patients to avoid biopsy with a negative serology; and positive serology results would require a patient to undergo biopsy. The DGF/tTG Screen assay  may very well be recognized as the best preliminary test for celiac disease. The combination of two tests which include a DGP/tTG screening, may have the ability to  identify celiac disease correctly in various clinical situations, which would allow biopsy to be avoided in the vast majority of cases.

    Although the findings were significant for this study, small bowel histology is still deemed the gold standard for accurate celiac disease diagnosis. Further validation of the algorithms is necessary to confirm the findings of this study before new diagnostic guidelines can be considered.

    Source:
    Open Original Shared Link

     




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Guest CJ Hughes

    Posted

    Plain English would sure be nice. It sounds to me like the patient who is self-diagnosed needs to start eating gluten again in order to undergo the alternative diagnostic method, like they would for the biopsy. That is just a totally unreasonable requirement. As in - not gonna happen.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest Courtney

    Posted

    Plain English would sure be nice. It sounds to me like the patient who is self-diagnosed needs to start eating gluten again in order to undergo the alternative diagnostic method, like they would for the biopsy. That is just a totally unreasonable requirement. As in - not gonna happen.

    I concur. What's even more ridiculous, is having to keep eating gluten until after the biopsy. Even with 2 positive blood tests, I must now wait, and suffer, while waiting to be seen by the gastroenterologist. You would think that if the blood came back positive the physicians might speed the process up, so one needs not to suffer.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest VICKIE

    Posted

    Well try having the serology negative and the biopsy positive by even a second opinion and then the next time sent to hospital with dehydration from diarrhea and low potassium, etc... and u have yet another invasive test, that they tell you that you do not have celiac disease you have leukocytic colitis caused from the anti-inflammatory drugs they put you on with a second opinion confirming that diagnosis but not ruleing out celiac disease and at follow up with GI doctor. he tells you that all you must have is IBS. What & where do you go then? So what test are actually right or accurate in diagnosing anything? or is it just the doctor?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Guest
    This is now closed for further comments

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate
  • About Me

    Destiny Stone

    I diagnosed myself for gluten intolerance after a lifetime of bizarre, seemingly unrelated afflictions. If my doctors had their way, I would have already undergone neck surgery, still be on 3 different inhalers for asthma, be vomiting daily and having chronic panic attacks. However, since eliminating gluten from my diet in May 2009, I no longer suffer from any of those things. Even with the proof in the pudding (or gluten) my doctors now want me to ingest gluten to test for celiac-no can do.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Related Articles

    Scott Adams
    Currently, the Center for Celiac Research is involved in two critical areas:
    * Multi-Center Serological Screening Study to determine the prevalence of Celiac Disease in the United States; and
    * New Diagnostic Assay to develop a non-invasive diagnostic test for Celiac Disease.
    1) SEROLOGIC SCREENING STUDY
    We have tested 3,076 samples as part of the Multi-Center Serological Study for the prevalence of Celiac Disease in the United States. Our preliminary findings indicate that 6.8% of first-degree relatives and 4.7% of second-degree relatives of Celiacs test positive for the disease. These results are similar to those reported previously in Europe, suggesting that Celiac Disease is currently under-diagnosed in the United States.We are extremely encouraged by these preliminary...


    Scott Adams
    Celiac.com 12/27/2005 - Funding for NIH (including the NIDDK which conducts critical research into Celiac disease) in next years Labor-HHS Appropriations Bill is only slightly above last years levels-inadequate to compensate for inflation and the development of promising research. However, Congress is also in the process of approving a 1% across-the-board cut to ALL discretionary programs (except Veterans programs)-including NIH.
    This cut will decrease the NIH funding level for the first time in a generation and put in mortal jeporady the research that can lead to treatments and eventually a cure for Celiac disease. Not only will this cut affect the work of NIH for this year, but will set back medical research into Celiac disease for many years to come.
    Because the Celiac...


    Jefferson Adams
    Increasing Incidence of Celiac Disease in a North American Population
    Celiac.com 04/29/2013 - In an effort to determine the accuracy of claims that rates of celiac disease are on the rise, a team of researchers recently examined rates of celiac disease in a well-defined US county.
    The research team included Jonas F. Ludvigsson, Alberto Rubio-Tapia, Carol T. van Dyke, L. Joseph Melton, Alan R. Zinsmeister, Brian D. Lahr and Joseph A. Murray. They are variously affiliated with the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology in the Departments of Medicine and Immunology at the College of Medicine of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, USA, and the Department of Pediatrics of Örebro University Hospital in Örebro, Sweden.
    For their population-based study, the team used medical, histopathology, and celiac disease serology records from the Rochester E...


  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to PixieSticks's topic in Super Sensitive People
      1

      Working in a kitchen with gluten?

    2. - PixieSticks posted a topic in Super Sensitive People
      1

      Working in a kitchen with gluten?

    3. - Art Maltman replied to Art Maltman's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      My 5 months of Struggle

    4. - Newhere19 replied to Newhere19's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      New to all of this

    5. - jjiillee replied to jjiillee's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Daughter waiting for appointment


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,520
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Aunty KK
    Newest Member
    Aunty KK
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Popular Now

    • Art Maltman
      5
    • JA917
      13
    • Dana Gilcrease
      5
    • marion wheaton
      6
    • Jula
  • Popular Articles

    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
  • Upcoming Events

×
×
  • Create New...