Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Organic Multi-Vitamin Without Gluten, Dairy And Soy


powerofpositivethinking

Recommended Posts

powerofpositivethinking Community Regular

I'm looking for suggestions regarding a new women's multi-vitamin that meets the following specs:

-no gluten, dairy and soy

-preferably organic

-nutrient dense

-only has to be taken once a day and can be taken on an empty stomach 

 

I am currently taking New Chapter Organics Women's Once Daily, but it contains soy, so I'd like to get away from that.

 

Any suggestions?

  • 1 month later...

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



powerofpositivethinking Community Regular

so my current vitamin supply will run out soon, and I needed to find something new mainly without soy.

 

it took me awhile, but I finally found some vitamins that fit my criteria and are certified gluten-free, Megafood vitamins.  I went to Whole Foods yesterday, after researching online, and then went into see what they had at the store, and after reading plenty of labels finally settled on Megafood.  They are also vegetarian, tested free of pesticides and herbicides, soy free, dairy free, farm fresh (that sounds good, but I don't really think that means much) and non-GMO.  Since I am still working on improving my Vitamin D levels, I also bought the 2000 iu D3 tablet in addition to the Women's One Daily vitamin since it only has 400 iu of D.  This supplement also has a good amount of Vitamin K in it, which I need since I was deficient in that nutrient.  I get K retested in a few weeks.

 

does anyone know that with all the push on women and calcium, why do so few multis have adequate levels?  that one puzzles me  :wacko: is it so they companies can make more money off of you when you buy another supplement, or am I missing something?

Adalaide Mentor

Over and over again as I check for interactions between my medications and supplements I see that it says not to take anything containing calcium with anything else. It explains that the reason for this is because taking calcium with other medications or supplements can cause you not to absorb them. I've also seen on meds (I read everything about them I can before I even fill a prescription unless it is an emergency) that they say not to take them with milk. The exceptions to this off the top of my head are things known to cause stomach upset and ulcers.

 

So I think there are probably two reasons they don't add obscene amounts of calcium to a multi. First, a significant amount of people do drink milk or consume dairy or other calcium rich foods daily and simply don't need it. (I am one of these, I probably get way more calcium through my diet than is recommended.) Secondly, there is simply no point in taking a multi if it is loaded with calcium that will prevent you from absorbing any significant amount of it.

 

FYI: this is all from my memory of what I have found when I am researching my own meds and supplements. I recommend doing your own research and making sure you are using reputable websites.

powerofpositivethinking Community Regular

thanks for the info!  makes sense now  :)

 

I've been reading from various sites, and here is what's on the Nature Made site:

 

 We do not recommend taking calcium along with your multivitamin if your multi contains iron. The calcium may interfere with the iron's absorption. If you take an iron containing multivitamin with your breakfast meal, take your calcium with the other meals you consume throughout the day, such as lunch and dinner.

 

if I'm spending all this money on supplements, I want to be absorbing them the best I can!

 

Over and over again as I check for interactions between my medications and supplements I see that it says not to take anything containing calcium with anything else. It explains that the reason for this is because taking calcium with other medications or supplements can cause you not to absorb them. I've also seen on meds (I read everything about them I can before I even fill a prescription unless it is an emergency) that they say not to take them with milk. The exceptions to this off the top of my head are things known to cause stomach upset and ulcers.

 

So I think there are probably two reasons they don't add obscene amounts of calcium to a multi. First, a significant amount of people do drink milk or consume dairy or other calcium rich foods daily and simply don't need it. (I am one of these, I probably get way more calcium through my diet than is recommended.) Secondly, there is simply no point in taking a multi if it is loaded with calcium that will prevent you from absorbing any significant amount of it.

 

FYI: this is all from my memory of what I have found when I am researching my own meds and supplements. I recommend doing your own research and making sure you are using reputable websites.

momma bee Rookie

Yes, generally they recommend taking calcium one hour after almost any other meds as it interferes with many. So either one hour after or up four hours before other meds is often the recommendation.

It makes a significant difference in synthroid and thyroid meds for anyone on those!! So it is important for with other supplements but I wish would make more clear on the calcium itself as the pharmacist doesn't review it with you the way they do meds! And can make a huge difference!! I have made that mistake a few times I am sad to admit (think I would have learned the first time)!!

  • 6 months later...
CyberCrone Newbie

Thanks for sharing your choice of brand because it gives me someplace to start and saves me a lot to time repeating the process you went through to arrive at a choice.  I trust someone else's personal experience more than marketing hype, sometimes even more than so-called "studies" that are so often poorly designed.

 

 

it took me awhile, but I finally found some vitamins that fit my criteria and are certified gluten-free, Megafood vitamins.  I went to Whole Foods yesterday, after researching online, and then went into see what they had at the store, and after reading plenty of labels finally settled on Megafood.  They are also vegetarian, tested free of pesticides and herbicides, soy free, dairy free, farm fresh (that sounds good, but I don't really think that means much) and non-GMO. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    2. - Roses8721 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      gluten-free Oatmeal

    3. - Roses8721 replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,472
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    kygirlsusan
    Newest Member
    kygirlsusan
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess one or both of the primary genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop active celiac disease. So, the gene test is an effective "rule out" tool but not an effective diagnostic tool.
    • Roses8721
      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    • Roses8721
      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
    • Scott Adams
      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    • Scott Adams
      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover from such a challenge, so why do this if you already know that gluten is the culprit and you won't be eating it anyway?  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS--but those in this group will usually have negative tests, or at best, elevated antibodies that don't reach the level of official positive. Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score.  Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis. The same is true for blood test results. Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion (some doctors apparently believe that this means the patient can decide if they want more testing or to go gluten-free). There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many patients are not told to eat gluten daily, lots of it, for the 6-8 week period leading up to their blood test, nor asked whether or not they've been eating gluten. Some patients even report to their doctors that they've been gluten-free for weeks or months before their blood tests, yet their doctors incorrectly say nothing to them about how this can affect their test, and create false negative results. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!), and the other 1 or 2 tests are negative.  Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease. These patients may end up on strong prescriptions for life to control their itching which also may have many negative side effects, for example Dapsone. Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer needlessly and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting celiac disease tests, but luckily some will find out about non-celiac gluten sensitivity on their own and go gluten-free and recover from their symptoms. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your health issues, and you've gone gluten-free, because many people will never figure this out.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.