Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Should I Have An Endoscopy?


nickadooski

Recommended Posts

nickadooski Newbie

HI!

Earlier this year my sister was diagnosed with Celiac after she presented with fairly typical symptoms (daily diarrhea, bloating, abdominal pain).

After her diagnoses I asked to be tested as well. I just found out today my blood test was positive and my physician told me that given my family history and the blood test she did not think a endoscopy/biopsy was necessary. However she didn't seem too knowledgeable about the condition because she said I would "probably benefit from going on a gluten free diet" whereas my research seems to indicate if you have Celiac, going gluten free is not optional.

I do have some atypical symptoms including missed menstruation (previously attributed to PCOS, although I am second guessing that diagnoses), constipation, occasional (but more than normal) abdominal pain (mild-moderate).

Bottom line: my parents think I should get the endoscopy like my sister did to confirm. Do you think this is necessary/advisable?

thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

Just want to say that missed periods/ infertility, constipation, abdominal pain are not atypical. They are very common.

I decided to get the endo and a colonoscopy at the same time to see how bad the damage was and make sure there wasn't any other issues I needed to deal with. To me, it was worth the piece of mind of knowing what was going on in there.

billybobhobw Newbie

If you could beat it to the punch then it is worth the time. The endo is a quick and painless exam. I was diagnosed a week ago and am so happy to have an answer as to why I have been feeling so bad. It has been years of feeling like garbage while being misdiagnosed over and over. I have been gluten free for only a week and can tell so much already. If I could have known before the symptoms become present I would have saved myself a lot of pain.

nickadooski Newbie

Thanks for your responses I appreciate them. I am planning to go gluten free either way I guess I was just wondering if a positive blood test and a family history was enough for a diagnosis.

1desperateladysaved Proficient

I didn't opt for endoscopy.  My MD said it was not necessary for me.  I was diagnosed with symptoms (I looked 5 months pregnant) and had an overwhelmingly positive genetic test for celiac. I also had a positive response to the gluten free diet.   I have since realized I had intestinal damaged by use of nutrition evaluation.  This gave me the added plus of being able to see how well my supplements are working.  Sometimes I wonder what my intestine looked like, but I am satisfied by watching how well it absorbs  I am still hoping that it will show some improvement.  Thus far, my iron levels have dropped, but they are only borderline low.

nvsmom Community Regular

I skipped the endoscopy too. I had two very positive blood tests, a good response to the gluten-free diet, a family history of celiac disease, and other autoimmune disorders - that was enough for me to go gluten-free. I too sometimes wonder what my villi would have looked like but on the flip side, what if I was one of those patients who ended up more confused because my doctor missed biopsying the damaged villi? I am content with my decision.

Some doctors will diagnose without a biopsy and others won't .... I have no real idea why doctors love their gold standard biopsy so much. It can be very helpful but it is not the be all, end all of diagnostic tools that some doctors imply.... In my opinion.

Good luck with the diet, and welcome to the board. :)

taynichaf Contributor

HI!

Earlier this year my sister was diagnosed with Celiac after she presented with fairly typical symptoms (daily diarrhea, bloating, abdominal pain).

After her diagnoses I asked to be tested as well. I just found out today my blood test was positive and my physician told me that given my family history and the blood test she did not think a endoscopy/biopsy was necessary. However she didn't seem too knowledgeable about the condition because she said I would "probably benefit from going on a gluten free diet" whereas my research seems to indicate if you have Celiac, going gluten free is not optional.

I do have some atypical symptoms including missed menstruation (previously attributed to PCOS, although I am second guessing that diagnoses), constipation, occasional (but more than normal) abdominal pain (mild-moderate).

Bottom line: my parents think I should get the endoscopy like my sister did to confirm. Do you think this is necessary/advisable?

thanks!

Yes get one before you go gluten free. You are a celiac and that means gluten free for the rest of your life! And somewhere down the road you might run into a doctor that will not take positive blood results as a diagnoses or something... idk, doctors are kinda dumb :/ ha. So just do it now, and get it done with! Its good to also be able to see how damaged your body is.

 

Good luck! I too had missed menstrations but negative blood tests :( I'm now waiting on my endoscopy results... I'm praying that the biopsies are positive... PLEASE pray for me! <3


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nosy parker Apprentice

I agree with kareng.  Celiac can cause extensive damage and I would want to know what my insides had suffered.  I assume some baseline might be useful if you want to establish how healing has progressed in the future. 

 

I'm actually quite surprised that doctors diagnose celiac and then don't do a thorough evaluation of a person's health inside and out, given the serious ramifications of this disease. 

nvsmom Community Regular

I'm actually quite surprised that doctors diagnose celiac and then don't do a thorough evaluation of a person's health inside and out, given the serious ramifications of this disease. 

 

My doctor asked if I wanted a biopsy and I said no. I aready knew that my intestine was damaged because of my high test scores, and because I have had symptoms my entire life. I did not want to risk sedation so the doctors' could rank my damage, or miss the damage and confuse my diagnosis. If there was something else wrong in there, I figured they could check it out later if my symptoms didn't resolve - they would probably see other problems better once celiac damage is healing/healed anyways. But this is just my personal opinion and may not apply to others at all.

 

I do think an endoscopic biopsy is a good idea for some situations like if:

  • blood work is negative but celiac is strongly suspected due to symptoms or family history.
  • blood work is barely positive and could be attributed to other health problems. ie. a barely positive tTG IgA caused by infection or thyroid problem.
  • the patient needs more incentive to go gluten-free because they can't accept the positive blood work.
  • an exploratory colonoscopy is being performed - they might as well scope both ends while at it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,901
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    tessycork47
    Newest Member
    tessycork47
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.