Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Would You Do?


Jrg

Recommended Posts

Jrg Newbie

I have an endoscopy scheduled for this Wednesday but was just told that my insurance won't cover it. It's going to set us back probably more than $700 in the end. I'm so completely nervous that I'll spend the money only to get negative biopsy results, which would just frustrate me even more. I already tested positive on the deamiated (sp) gliadin iGa blood test, negative on the others. So I know there's a chance the biopsy could go either way. My question is, what would you do? Just assume you have celiacs, go gluten free & cancel the test, or fork over the money just to know for sure?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

Have your GI contest that by giving the insurance company more info? It might delay it a couple of weeks but that is what most doctors offices do.

Jrg Newbie

Have your GI contest that by giving the insurance company more info? It might delay it a couple of weeks but that is what most doctors offices do.

They said it was because I hadn't reached my deductible for this year yet. I thought an endoscopy would fall under a different category but it doesn't so I'm not sure if contesting it will do any good.

kareng Grand Master

They said it was because I hadn't reached my deductible for this year yet. I thought an endoscopy would fall under a different category but it doesn't so I'm not sure if contesting it will do any good.

That's not the same as your insurance won't pay for it. So an appeal wouldn't make any sense.

Jrg Newbie

That's not the same as your insurance won't pay for it. So an appeal wouldn't make any sense.

Well I didn't suggest an appeal. I said that my insurance wasn't going to cover it. I was originally told that it wouldn't be a problem & I would just have to pay a copay, so now that I found out I will have to cover the full amount I'm just wondering what people would do. I'm torn as to whether I should go through w/it or just take my blood results & vitamin/iron deficiencies & just assume to go gluten free to see what happens.

Lock Newbie

If it were me, I would go through with the endoscopy IF I trusted the GI doctor to be very thorough and to use the latest techniques to find any villous damage, if the damage exists. If the doctor is not up to speed with diagnosing celiac then a negative result will only confuse you more. But if he is very good, a negative result will assure you that your intestine is healthy. So my answer as to whether you should pay for this and go ahead with the procedure depends on the quality of the doctor.

cyclinglady Grand Master

I'm self-employed and pay for our health insurance policy.  When you have a policy that has a deductible, you need to set aside money to cover that deductible.  Seven hundred dollars seems like a lot, but in perspective, it's not really.  Not when it involves your health.  

 

In my opinion, this is an "emergency".  The long term side effects of not treating celiac disease are far more costly.  Would you balk if you thought you had cancer?  If you were in a car accident and needed surgery?

 

That said, if you really can't afford the endoscopy, you can always go gluten free based on your blood test.    My hubby did just that.  Docs suggested that he give up gluten and he did.  He strictly adheres to the diet.  I got scoped only because I didn't have a tummy issues and had a hard time believing that both of us have gluten issues.  

 

Hope this helps!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

Well I didn't suggest an appeal. I said that my insurance wasn't going to cover it. I was originally told that it wouldn't be a problem & I would just have to pay a copay, so now that I found out I will have to cover the full amount I'm just wondering what people would do. I'm torn as to whether I should go through w/it or just take my blood results & vitamin/iron deficiencies & just assume to go gluten free to see what happens.

 

 

I suggested it because I couldn't tell why they wouldn't cover it.  Thought it might help.

 

Myself - I would and did pay for my colonoscopy and endo with the deductible.  It cost a lot more than $700 but I had the colonoscopy portion and anesthesia, too.  I thought it was worth it to see the amount of damage and make sure nothing else was wrong.  We put money aside in a health reimbursement account but its too late for you for this year.  If you are young and haven't had anything medical to pay out before, its not something you would want to do.

 

If you decide to pay yourself. I would find out how much deductible you have to meet.  So you know how much your limit will be.  Also, will you have to pay the pathology company for looking at the biopsy?  Pay any additional for sedation?  Does the doctor bill separately from the center where you are getting the procedure done?  Just some additional costs to consider.   

nvsmom Community Regular

It depends on you. Would a positive endoscopy help you stay gluten-free? What if the endoscopy is negative (there are a few around here with positive blood tests and negative scope - it's not uncommon), will that affect your dedication to the gluten-free diet?

 

I personally think a scope can be useful if you continue to have long term problems (which would be useful if you get re-scoped in the future for comparisson) or there is another un-idenified health issue in play that needs to be found.

 

I personally did not do the scope and just went gluten-free based on a couple of blood tests. I figured that if I continued to have problems, I could always get the scope done in the future to look for other problems.

 

You have to do what you feel comfortable with.  :) Aren't I helpful?  LOL ;) Good luck with what ever you decide to do.

Jrg Newbie

Thank you everyone. I went ahead with the endoscopy today, so now I'll just wait for my biopsy results

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Colleen H replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Gluten related ??

    2. - Jmartes71 replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    3. - AlwaysLearning replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    4. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Gluten related ??


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,076
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Deb baker
    Newest Member
    Deb baker
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Colleen H
      Thank you so much for your response  Yes it seems as though things get very painful as time goes on.  I'm not eating gluten as far as I know.  However, I'm not sure of cross contamination.  My system seems to weaken to hidden spices and other possibilities. ???  if cross contamination is possible...I am in a super sensitive mode of celiac disease.. Neuropathy from head to toes
    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.