Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Thoughts On This Statement


cmc811

Recommended Posts

cmc811 Apprentice

Type 1 lesions, with IEL only, can be seen in IBS and other causes of malabsorption.  If a patient has a Marsh Type 1 lesion in the duodenum and positive TTG antibodies, the diagnosis is either Celiac Disease or Crohn’s Disease.  If anti-endomysial antibodies are present, it is Celiac Disease, and if they are absent, it is Crohn’s Disease.

 

I stumbled across this statement today on Open Original Shared Link and I wanted some thoughts. Obviously that is a very black and white statement and understanding Celiac never seems to be that clear.

 

I'm particularly interested in what Marsh 1 with positive ttg means because that is exactly where I'm at. Unfortunately the EMA was never ordered and I have now been gluten free for 9 days. I haven't had a follow up appt with my GI yet, I just was told that my biopsy wasn't the typical findings of celiac. Her advice was that if I feel better off gluten, I should continue to avoid it. It seemed like she was just leaving it at that because she never mentioned following up at all.

 

So...........if a positive ttg and Marsh 1 doesn't always mean Celiac, then what? Shouldn't she be ruling out other causes? Those 2 findings aren't "normal" and something is causing them. To be honest I know very little about Crohn's disease but it has never been mentioned as a possibility when discussing my symptoms with my PCP or GI.

 

I just wish it really was as black and white as the quoted statement makes it seem...


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



LauraTX Rising Star

This article, the second column on the first page... gives a good layout of the number grading of lesions.
Open Original Shared Link
 
Whoever gave this statement misspoke in the second sentence.  But the third sentence clarifies.  If antibodies are present, it is celiac.  If not, it is crohn's.
 
It really should read: If a patient has a Marsh Type 1 lesion in the duodenum, the diagnosis is either Celiac Disease or Crohn’s Disease.  If anti-endomysial antibodies are present, it is Celiac Disease, and if they are absent, it is Crohn’s Disease.

 

Maybe we should contact them to let them know of the error.  I am going to email the blogger.

 

Edit to add:  It looks like it was probably her error as she was transcribing events of the day to her blog.  I sent her an email contact.

jebby Enthusiast

Hi CMC and Laura,

Laura did email me and I am very grateful that she did, and I am sorry about any confusion.

Dr. Marsh, the founder of the a Marsh grading system for the small intestinal changes seen in celiac disease, gave a talk at the ICDS, and he is the one who I paraphrased in my blog post.

From what Dr. Marsh said during the lecture, if a patient has symptoms, elevated TTG antibodies, and a Marsh 1 lesion, there are 2 possibilities, either Celiac Disease (likely an early stage) or Crohn's Disease. The other causes of a Marsh 1 lesion, such as IBS or lactose intolerance, do not cause the TTG antibodies to be elevated.

To determine if the symptoms, elevated TTG, and Marsh 1 lesion is from Celiac v. Crohn's, the endomysial antibodies should be checked. If the endomysial antibodies are normal, the patient likely has Crohn's, as they should be elevated in Celiac Disease.

Nothing in medicine is ever black and white, but I believe that he was trying to provide a framework/guidelines for medical decision making for some of these gray areas of celiac diagnosis.

Thank you also for reading my post in the first place, as poor Laura learned from my email I am really at a low point with blogging and updating it right now....

Jess

cmc811 Apprentice

Hi CMC and Laura,

Laura did email me and I am very grateful that she did, and I am sorry about any confusion.

Dr. Marsh, the founder of the a Marsh grading system for the small intestinal changes seen in celiac disease, gave a talk at the ICDS, and he is the one who I paraphrased in my blog post.

From what Dr. Marsh said during the lecture, if a patient has symptoms, elevated TTG antibodies, and a Marsh 1 lesion, there are 2 possibilities, either Celiac Disease (likely an early stage) or Crohn's Disease. The other causes of a Marsh 1 lesion, such as IBS or lactose intolerance, do not cause the TTG antibodies to be elevated.

To determine if the symptoms, elevated TTG, and Marsh 1 lesion is from Celiac v. Crohn's, the endomysial antibodies should be checked. If the endomysial antibodies are normal, the patient likely has Crohn's, as they should be elevated in Celiac Disease.

Nothing in medicine is ever black and white, but I believe that he was trying to provide a framework/guidelines for medical decision making for some of these gray areas of celiac diagnosis.

Thank you also for reading my post in the first place, as poor Laura learned from my email I am really at a low point with blogging and updating it right now....

Jess

Thank you so much for the clarification!!!

 

It doesn't help my particular situation because EMA was never ordered for me but my GI said it was very likely Celiac and was confident enough to call it that. I guess now I just worry that the diagnosis wasn't right. Is seeing how I feel on the diet the next step? My tTg was just mildly elevated (7 with >4 being positive) and with my biopsy only showing Marsh I it makes me less confident about the diagnosis I guess.

Unrelated but I just got my endoscopy report in the mail and I'm a bit disapointed. Only says "multiple biopsies" but doesn't say how many or if any were taken from the bulb. Just says "duodenum". And the pathology report isn't helpful either. It states "The specimen consists of multiple tan-gray tissue fragment(s) measuring up to 0.5cm. The specimen is entirely submitted between sponges in one cassette."

 

I thought I read somewhere that the tissue taken from each biopsy was supposed to be submitted separately, but of course I can't find that article now so I have no idea the source. Also it just says "increased number of intraepithelial lymphocytes" but there isn't a number. Is that normal?

 

I have been given the diagnosis and I have no problem with being gluten-free but I just want to be confident about it and unfortunately I'm just as unsure now as before my endoscopy :(

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Russ H posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      0

      Anti-endomysial Antibody (EMA) Testing

    2. - Scott Adams replied to JoJo0611's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      Just diagnosed today

    3. - Scott Adams replied to GlorietaKaro's topic in Super Sensitive People
      1

      Am I nuts?

    4. - Scott Adams replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      28

      My journey is it gluten or fiber?

    5. - Russ H replied to Samanthaeileen1's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      6

      Thoughts? Non-endoscopic Celiac diagnosis in two year old

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,805
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    lalan45
    Newest Member
    lalan45
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Russ H
      I thought this might be of interest regarding anti-EMA testing. Some labs use donated umbilical cord instead of monkey oesophagus. Some labs just provide a +ve/-ve test result but others provide a grade by testing progressively diluted blood sample. https://www.aesku.com/index.php/ifu-download/1367-ema-instruction-manual-en-1/file Fluorescence-labelled anti-tTG2 autoantibodies bind to endomysium (the thin layer around muscle fibres) forming a characteristic honeycomb pattern under the microscope - this is highly specific to coeliac disease. The binding site is extracellular tTG2 bound to fibronectin and collagen. Human or monkey derived endomysium is necessary because tTG2 from other mammals does not provide the right binding epitope. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/26/3/1012
    • Scott Adams
      First, please know that receiving two diagnoses at once, especially one you've never heard of, is undoubtedly overwhelming. You are not alone in this. Your understanding is correct: both celiac disease and Mesenteric Panniculitis (MP) are considered to have autoimmune components. While having both is not extremely common, they can co-occur, as chronic inflammation from one autoimmune condition can sometimes be linked to or trigger other inflammatory responses in the body. MP, which involves inflammation of the fat tissue in the mesentery (the membrane that holds your intestines in place), is often discovered incidentally on scans, exactly as in your case. The fact that your medical team is already planning follow-up with a DEXA scan (to check bone density, common after a celiac diagnosis) and a repeat CT is a very proactive and prudent approach to monitoring your health. Many find that adhering strictly to the gluten-free diet for celiac disease helps manage overall inflammation, which may positively impact MP over time. It's completely normal to feel uncertain right now. Your next steps are to take this one day at a time, focus on the gluten-free diet as your primary treatment for celiac, and use your upcoming appointments to ask all your questions about MP and what the monitoring plan entails. This dual diagnosis is a lot to process, but it is also the starting point for a managed path forward to better health. This article has some detailed information on how to be 100% gluten-free, so it may be helpful (be sure to also read the comments section.):    
    • Scott Adams
      Your experience is absolutely valid, and you are not "nuts" or a "complete weirdo." What you are describing aligns with severe neurological manifestations of gluten sensitivity, which is a recognized, though less common, presentation. Conditions like gluten ataxia and peripheral neuropathy are documented in medical literature, where gluten triggers an autoimmune response that attacks the nervous system, leading to symptoms precisely like yours—loss of coordination, muscle weakness, fasciculations, and even numbness. The reaction you had from inhaling flour is a powerful testament to your extreme sensitivity. While celiac disease is commonly tested, non-celiac gluten sensitivity with neurological involvement is harder to diagnose, especially since many standard tests require ongoing gluten consumption, which you rightly fear could be dangerous. Seeking out a neurologist or gastroenterologist familiar with gluten-related disorders, or consulting a specialist at a major celiac research center, could provide more validation and possibly explore diagnostic options like specific antibody tests (e.g., anti-gliadin or transglutaminase 6 antibodies) that don't always require a gluten challenge. You are not alone; many individuals with severe reactivity navigate a world of invisible illness where their strict avoidance is a medical necessity, not a choice. Trust your body's signals—it has given you the most important diagnosis already.
    • Scott Adams
      Some members here take GliadinX (a sponsor here) if they eat out in restaurants or outside their homes. It has been shown in numerous studies to break down small amounts of gluten in the stomach, before it reaches your intestines. This would be for small amounts of cross-contamination, and it would not allow any celiac to eat gluten again.
    • Russ H
      The anti-endomysial antibody test is an old test that is generally reported as positive or negative - a lab technician looks down a microscope to check for fluorescence of the sample. It is less sensitive but more specific for coeliac disease than IgA tTG2. Hence, it is not "barely positive" - it is positive. People diagnosed in childhood recover much more quickly than adults.  I would look at testing all 1st degree relatives - parents, siblings.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.