Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Thoughts On This Statement


cmc811

Recommended Posts

cmc811 Apprentice

Type 1 lesions, with IEL only, can be seen in IBS and other causes of malabsorption.  If a patient has a Marsh Type 1 lesion in the duodenum and positive TTG antibodies, the diagnosis is either Celiac Disease or Crohn’s Disease.  If anti-endomysial antibodies are present, it is Celiac Disease, and if they are absent, it is Crohn’s Disease.

 

I stumbled across this statement today on Open Original Shared Link and I wanted some thoughts. Obviously that is a very black and white statement and understanding Celiac never seems to be that clear.

 

I'm particularly interested in what Marsh 1 with positive ttg means because that is exactly where I'm at. Unfortunately the EMA was never ordered and I have now been gluten free for 9 days. I haven't had a follow up appt with my GI yet, I just was told that my biopsy wasn't the typical findings of celiac. Her advice was that if I feel better off gluten, I should continue to avoid it. It seemed like she was just leaving it at that because she never mentioned following up at all.

 

So...........if a positive ttg and Marsh 1 doesn't always mean Celiac, then what? Shouldn't she be ruling out other causes? Those 2 findings aren't "normal" and something is causing them. To be honest I know very little about Crohn's disease but it has never been mentioned as a possibility when discussing my symptoms with my PCP or GI.

 

I just wish it really was as black and white as the quoted statement makes it seem...


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



LauraTX Rising Star

This article, the second column on the first page... gives a good layout of the number grading of lesions.
Open Original Shared Link
 
Whoever gave this statement misspoke in the second sentence.  But the third sentence clarifies.  If antibodies are present, it is celiac.  If not, it is crohn's.
 
It really should read: If a patient has a Marsh Type 1 lesion in the duodenum, the diagnosis is either Celiac Disease or Crohn’s Disease.  If anti-endomysial antibodies are present, it is Celiac Disease, and if they are absent, it is Crohn’s Disease.

 

Maybe we should contact them to let them know of the error.  I am going to email the blogger.

 

Edit to add:  It looks like it was probably her error as she was transcribing events of the day to her blog.  I sent her an email contact.

jebby Enthusiast

Hi CMC and Laura,

Laura did email me and I am very grateful that she did, and I am sorry about any confusion.

Dr. Marsh, the founder of the a Marsh grading system for the small intestinal changes seen in celiac disease, gave a talk at the ICDS, and he is the one who I paraphrased in my blog post.

From what Dr. Marsh said during the lecture, if a patient has symptoms, elevated TTG antibodies, and a Marsh 1 lesion, there are 2 possibilities, either Celiac Disease (likely an early stage) or Crohn's Disease. The other causes of a Marsh 1 lesion, such as IBS or lactose intolerance, do not cause the TTG antibodies to be elevated.

To determine if the symptoms, elevated TTG, and Marsh 1 lesion is from Celiac v. Crohn's, the endomysial antibodies should be checked. If the endomysial antibodies are normal, the patient likely has Crohn's, as they should be elevated in Celiac Disease.

Nothing in medicine is ever black and white, but I believe that he was trying to provide a framework/guidelines for medical decision making for some of these gray areas of celiac diagnosis.

Thank you also for reading my post in the first place, as poor Laura learned from my email I am really at a low point with blogging and updating it right now....

Jess

cmc811 Apprentice

Hi CMC and Laura,

Laura did email me and I am very grateful that she did, and I am sorry about any confusion.

Dr. Marsh, the founder of the a Marsh grading system for the small intestinal changes seen in celiac disease, gave a talk at the ICDS, and he is the one who I paraphrased in my blog post.

From what Dr. Marsh said during the lecture, if a patient has symptoms, elevated TTG antibodies, and a Marsh 1 lesion, there are 2 possibilities, either Celiac Disease (likely an early stage) or Crohn's Disease. The other causes of a Marsh 1 lesion, such as IBS or lactose intolerance, do not cause the TTG antibodies to be elevated.

To determine if the symptoms, elevated TTG, and Marsh 1 lesion is from Celiac v. Crohn's, the endomysial antibodies should be checked. If the endomysial antibodies are normal, the patient likely has Crohn's, as they should be elevated in Celiac Disease.

Nothing in medicine is ever black and white, but I believe that he was trying to provide a framework/guidelines for medical decision making for some of these gray areas of celiac diagnosis.

Thank you also for reading my post in the first place, as poor Laura learned from my email I am really at a low point with blogging and updating it right now....

Jess

Thank you so much for the clarification!!!

 

It doesn't help my particular situation because EMA was never ordered for me but my GI said it was very likely Celiac and was confident enough to call it that. I guess now I just worry that the diagnosis wasn't right. Is seeing how I feel on the diet the next step? My tTg was just mildly elevated (7 with >4 being positive) and with my biopsy only showing Marsh I it makes me less confident about the diagnosis I guess.

Unrelated but I just got my endoscopy report in the mail and I'm a bit disapointed. Only says "multiple biopsies" but doesn't say how many or if any were taken from the bulb. Just says "duodenum". And the pathology report isn't helpful either. It states "The specimen consists of multiple tan-gray tissue fragment(s) measuring up to 0.5cm. The specimen is entirely submitted between sponges in one cassette."

 

I thought I read somewhere that the tissue taken from each biopsy was supposed to be submitted separately, but of course I can't find that article now so I have no idea the source. Also it just says "increased number of intraepithelial lymphocytes" but there isn't a number. Is that normal?

 

I have been given the diagnosis and I have no problem with being gluten-free but I just want to be confident about it and unfortunately I'm just as unsure now as before my endoscopy :(

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - xxnonamexx posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      FDA looking for input on Celiac Gluten sensitivity labeling PLEASE READ and submit your suggestions

    2. - cristiana replied to Atl222's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      2

      Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes after 10 yrs gluten-free

    3. - trents replied to Atl222's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      2

      Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes after 10 yrs gluten-free

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Aretaeus Cappadocia's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Brown Rice Vinegar (organic) from Eden Foods is likely gluten free

    5. - Scott Adams replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      nothing has changed

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,193
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Loiswxm333
    Newest Member
    Loiswxm333
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • xxnonamexx
      Please read: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-steps-improve-gluten-ingredient-disclosure-foods?fbclid=IwY2xjawPeXhJleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETFzaDc3NWRaYzlJOFJ4R0Fic3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHrwuSsw8Be7VNGOrKKWFVbrjmf59SGht05nIALwnjQ0DoGkDDK1doRBDzeeX_aem_GZcRcbhisMTyFUp3YMUU9Q
    • cristiana
      Hi @Atl222 As @trents points out, there could be many reasons for this biopsy result.  I am interested to know, is your gastroenterologist concerned?  Also, are your blood tests showing steady improvement over the years? I remember when I had my last biopsy, several years after diagnosis, mine came back with with raised lymphocytes but no villous damage, too! In my own case, my consultant wasn't remotely concerned - in fact, he said I might still get this result even if all I ever did was eat nothing but rice and water.   My coeliac blood tests were still steadily improving, albeit slowly, which was reassuring.
    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @Atl222! Yes, your increased lymphocytes could be in response to oats or it could possibly be cross contamination from gluten that is getting into your diet from some unexpected source but not enough to damage the villi. And I'm certain that increased lymphocytes can be caused by other things besides celiac disease or gluten/oats exposure. See attachment. But you might try eliminating oats to start with and possibly dairy for a few months and then seek another endoscopy/biopsy to see if there was a reduction in lymphocyte counts. 
    • Scott Adams
      This is a solid, well-reasoned approach. You’re right that “koji” by itself doesn’t indicate gluten status, and the risk really does come down to which grain is used to culture it. The fact that you directly contacted Eden Foods and received a clear statement that their koji is made from rice only, with no wheat or barley, is meaningful due diligence—especially since Eden has a long-standing reputation for transparency. While the lack of gluten labeling can understandably give pause, manufacturer confirmation like this is often what people rely on for traditionally fermented products. As always, trusting your body after trying it is reasonable, but based on the information you gathered, your conclusion makes sense.
    • Scott Adams
      Seven months can still be early in celiac healing, especially if you were mostly asymptomatic to begin with—symptoms like low iron, vitamin D deficiency, nail changes, and hair issues often take much longer to improve because the gut needs time to recover before absorption normalizes. A tTG-IgA of 69 is not “low” in terms of immune activity, and it can take 12–24 months (sometimes longer) for antibodies and the intestinal lining to fully heal, particularly in teens and young adults. Eating gluten again to “test” things isn’t recommended and won’t give you clear answers—it’s far more likely to cause harm than clarity. Weight not changing is also very common in celiac and doesn’t rule anything out. Please know that your frustration and sadness matter; this adjustment is hard, and feeling stuck can really affect mental health. You deserve support, and if you can, reaching out to a GI dietitian or mental health professional familiar with chronic illness could really help you through this phase. This study indicates that a majority of celiacs don't recover until 5 years after diagnosis and starting a gluten-free diet: Mucosal recovery and mortality in adults with celiac disease after treatment with a gluten-free diet However, it's also possible that what the study really shows is the difficulty in maintaining a 100% gluten-free diet. I suspect that if you looked closely at the diets of those who did not recover within 2 years might be that their diets were not 100% gluten-free. Perhaps they ate out more often, or didn't understand all of the hidden ingredients where gluten can hide. Either way, it shows how difficult recovery from celiac disease can be for most people. According to this study: This article explores other causes of flattened villi:    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.