Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

"how Sensitive Are You?"


BlessedMommy

Recommended Posts

BlessedMommy Rising Star

As you know, this is usually a question from people who want to know if you will purposefully eat food that's been contaminated.  :rolleyes:

 

My situation is that given the severity of my high levels of gluten response, I would prefer not to tempt fate by being careless with lower levels. I did get a headache and a low grade fever the other day though after what I think was a slight gluten exposure. Sometimes I wonder though if that was gluten or something else.

 

So I do seem to get some responses to low level contamination but certainly not a rush trip to the ER. 

 

So, what's a meaningful and concise way to answer that question that doesn't give people too much detail but also doesn't lie? 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



IrishHeart Veteran

As you know, this is usually a question from people who want to know if you will purposefully eat food that's been contaminated.  :rolleyes:

 

 

 

Honestly, no. I do not know a single person in my life who would ask me if I would purposefully eat food that's been contaminated

with gluten. 

 

No one I know would ask such a stupid question of me. 

BlessedMommy Rising Star

I read your testimony, and yes, I agree that any person who would ask you a question like that, would be pretty silly. If it would be like asking someone if they would eat rat poison on purpose. 

IrishHeart Veteran

It's as ridiculous as asking you that question.

BlessedMommy Rising Star

So pretty much treat it like a dumb question? 

IrishHeart Veteran

So pretty much treat it like a dumb question? 

^_^

 

who is asking this question of you? 

BlessedMommy Rising Star

My cousin once asked me that question, when referring to a restaurant that stated as a disclaimer that cross contamination may occur. 

 

I sort of bumbled through an answer which boiled down to, "I use my common sense, ask questions, ask for accomodations, and avoid the chips made in the shared frier." 

 

On another occasion, I refused to eat my own dish at a potluck after someone CC'ed it. Someone said, "Well maybe you're not THAT allergic." 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



IrishHeart Veteran

Hon, you want my very best advice about this whole thing?

 

Say it once to everyone and never explain yourself again.

 

 

"Gluten tried to kill me. I can't eat it. Not a single speck. Understand? "

 

Then, smile .......and let it go.

BlessedMommy Rising Star

I love it! That really gets the point across. 

IrishHeart Veteran

I have said it (but with swear words).

 

 

Yes, your rat poison analogy also works. My husband usually says  strychnine. 

BlessedMommy Rising Star

I think that people just do not understand how ridiculous it is to mess around with something that could destroy your ability to function independently and speak correctly.

 

Of course, in this society, almost everybody seems to subscribe to the "a little won't hurt" mentality.  :blink:

IrishHeart Veteran

 

 

Of course, in this society, almost everybody seems to subscribe to the "a little won't hurt" mentality.  :blink:

 

well, that depends on what "that little something" IS... ^_^

cristiana Veteran

I don't know about you but one of my problems pre-diagnosis was liver function test results that my doctor didn't like the look of.  I often get the impression that people think I am taking this gluten-free diet too far but when I say that gluten affects my liver they don't say any more.   

NatureChick Rookie

I think there is a huge difference between risking a slight cross contamination and eating a meal that you know contains an ingredient that has gluten. For me, a minor cross contamination could mean feeling lousy for a few days. A full-on glutening could mean all-over pain for weeks. 

I generally don't risk either, but everyone I know in real life who is gluten free (three total) takes many more risks than I do, eating out at restaurants that have gluten-free items on their menu, trying the food a coworker claims to be gluten free, eating the home-made foods friends gave them. And I know from their experience that they are not gluten-free because they call me for sympathy or send pictures of their break outs when they are in the middle of their reactions. 

But they do honestly believe (hope) that the foods will be gluten-free before they eat them. I don't know if I'm less trusting or just less willing to lose a few days to recovery that the risks just don't seem worth it. The last risk I took was eating food prepared by my cousin at Thanksgiving. The contamination really wasn't that bad because I only tried the foods that I thought would be okay (watched how they were prepared), and I slept through most of my reaction over on a long weekend ... but I definitely brought my own food at Christmas. Plus, who wants to quiz their host about every ingredient?

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,197
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Joanne01
    Newest Member
    Joanne01
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
    • trents
      @JettaGirl, "Coeliac" is the British spelling of "celiac". Same disease. 
    • JettaGirl
      This may sound ridiculous but is this supposed to say Celiacs? I looked up Coeliacs because you never know, there’s a lot of diseases related to a disease that they come up with similar names for. It’s probably meant to say Celiacs but I just wanted to confirm.
    • JoJo0611
      I was told it was to see how much damage has been caused. But just told CT with contrast not any other name for it. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.