Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Need Help Interpreting These Results


across

Recommended Posts

across Contributor

I'm good at a number of things, but science isn't one of them, so the more you can explain things in plain English, the more grateful I will be! :-) I need some help interpreting my test results.

 

I've been gluten free for six months, but had a three week period when I ate a small amount gluten just prior to these tests (it was difficult to cook at home during that time because we were having plumbing issues).

 

My doctor told me repeatedly that I did not have to do a gluten challenge before taking the tests. I knew this was incorrect.

 

The results came back as follows. Based on these results, he diagnosed me as gluten intolerant, not celiac:

 

Gliadin AB, deamid. IgG 4.1 (within range)

 

Gliadin AB, deamid. IgA 21.8 (weak positive)

 

TTG IgG 3.0 (negative)

 

TTG IgA 1.9 (negative)

 

Does the weak positive on the IgA mean I should do a gluten challenge and pursue further testing with a different doctor? 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nvsmom Community Regular

Do you know what your lab's reference ranges were? Was it 0-20?

 

I'm surprised that you had a weak positive on the DGP IgA is you have been gluten-free, even though you did have some gluten prior to testing. The DGP IgA tests shows an autoimmune reaction to gliadian which is only positive in celiacs - it is not thought to be a test for those with non-celiac gluten intolerance (NCGI).  This report has more on the tests on pages 10-12: Open Original Shared Link

 

The DGP IgA has a specificity to celiac disease of 93-96%, so that means that when you have a positive result, chances are it is caused by celiac disease. It is also the best test (along with DGP IgG) for catching early celiac disease and monitoring dietary compliance - it is the first test to change with diet change. If you continued to eat gluten, it would probably become even more positive, and eventually (after 8-12 weeks of gluten, the tTG tests would most likely become positive too. You were correct about a gluten challenge being required for accurate testing... it's a shame when doctors mess this stuff up!

 

Pursuing a diagnosis is entirely up to you. You have one positive celiac disease test, and a good response to the gluten-free diet - if that is enough for you then you could go gluten-free for life tomorrow.  If you want more reasons to go gluten-free, then you should be tested and perhaps even have the biopsy (only 2-4 weeks of gluten needed for that).

 

Best wishes in what ever you decide to do.

across Contributor

Thank you, nvsmom-- I really appreciate your help!

 

The reference range for the deamid. gliadin IgA was <20 neg., 20-30 weak positive, >30 positive.

 

I can't imagine doing a gluten challenge! Just the small amount of gluten I had prior to the test made me miserable. I'm still dealing with the aftereffects of that. Ugh!

 

The thing is, I hate uncertainty. I have no problem going gluten free, but from what I've read, having celiac requires an extra measure of vigilance that I'm not doing right now. I still eat gluten-free at restaurants for example, which I'm not sure I'd risk if I was certain I had celiac. My extended family also thinks I'm a hypochondriac when I talk about my issues with gluten, and I guess I feel like maybe they'll cut me a little slack if I have an official diagnosis. Additionally, my mother and sister have symptoms, and I'd love for them to get tested.

 

I don't know -- I really don't want to go through all the pain and damage to my body that a biopsy would entail. Sigh...

nvsmom Community Regular

If your family gives you grief over it, you can honestly say, "I tested positive for celiac disease." It's true!  You just have a clueless doctor who did not recognize that fact, and tested you without a gluten challenge.  LOL ;)  :rolleyes:

 

I know what you mean about wanting more "proof" that you have to go gluten-free, but you may not get any.  :(  It looks like you need to go gluten-free anyways though.  Those with NCGI need to be 100%gluten-free too.  They don't eat gluten-lite, they eat gluten-free.  Celiacs and those with NCGI eat the same way.

 

Hang in there.  Getting a diagnosis, coming to grips with it, and going gluten-free is tough... but you can do it.  :)

BlessedMommy Rising Star

Celiacs can and do still eat at restaurants, though most choose not to go too often, to limit the risk.

 

I'm eat out on occasion. I don't eat at places like Taco Bell, though. I try to be selective as to where I go.

 

I prefer to go to places that have a better gluten free reputation and an established protocol for handling things. Some of my favorites are California Pizza Kitchen and PF Changs. I also like BD's Mongolian Grill. (they have a separate grill for allergies)

 

I will get a plain baked potato at Wendy's on occasion and request that they change gloves before handling.

across Contributor

I'm glad to hear you can still eat out, BlessedMommy!

 

My head is still spinning from all of this. I eat out a whole lot. I always order something gluten-free, but I've been glutened before in some of the restaurants even with the gluten free options. Also, I have to spend two weeks in another state for school in a few weeks. I have to live in the dorm and eat in the cafeteria during that time. I know they do gluten free options, but I don't know how strict they are with their prep methods.

 

I also have a problem in that my mother recently moved to town and lives three doors down. She LOVES to cook, and feels that me eating her cooking = me accepting her love. She definitely does not understand how little gluten it would take to make me sick (she was the one trying to get me to eat fried chicken because it had "just a little flour.") Her butter crock, for example, is filled with breadcrumbs, so even eating plain veggies with butter would be a problem at her house.

 

I don't eat anything that I know has gluten in it, but I haven't been extra vigilant about cross contamination because I figured if I accidentally got glutened, I would get over it after awhile. It it's celiac, everything is raised to another level.

 

I guess I just need a little time for my mind to come to terms with all of this...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Colleen H replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Gluten related ??

    2. - Jmartes71 replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    3. - AlwaysLearning replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    4. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Gluten related ??


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,076
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Deb baker
    Newest Member
    Deb baker
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Colleen H
      Thank you so much for your response  Yes it seems as though things get very painful as time goes on.  I'm not eating gluten as far as I know.  However, I'm not sure of cross contamination.  My system seems to weaken to hidden spices and other possibilities. ???  if cross contamination is possible...I am in a super sensitive mode of celiac disease.. Neuropathy from head to toes
    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.