Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Do I Have Celiac?

thepeach80

Recommended Posts

thepeach80 Rookie
thepeach80
Posted

Weird mish mash of questions, so bear with me please. I don't remember when sx started, first bad sx started in 2007 around my daughter's first birthday. Went gluten-free, easy enough as we were doing a gluten-free trial for my son then too (3 of my 5 kids have had wheat issues in infancy/toddlerhood) sx went away. Came back randomly, dx with IBS in 2009 and it went on for weeks. Had had blood work in early 2008 for Celiac, but have no idea what they tested for or what the results were other than they said negative. Have done on and off wheat free (they could handle oats) diet from 2005-2010. My father has worsening Crohn's and aunt has Fibro. Seem to have a strong hx of gastro issues as well as allergy issues in my own children.

 

Had gallbladder issues in 12/2012. Saw GI 1/13 who recommended scope as he wasn't sure based on my sx it was gallbladder, or at least that wasn't all of it. Ended up having gallbladder removed 2/13, 5 days before scheduled scope. Ended up having scope 5/14 showing moderate damage to stomach lining and intestines leaning towards Celiac. Followed it up with tTG testing and was told it was negative and I did not have Celiac. I decided to go gluten free anyways last June and haven't looked back. I can tell a marked difference when I accidentally have gluten now. Things I lived for for years that I didn't think twice about until I stopped gluten. Anyways, tTG was 5. I don't know if I've had any other blood work besides that or not, the anti-gliadin etc. 

 

All of that, would you feel comfortable saying Celiac is the diagnosis? What about the kids, at least the older ones. They are 11, 9, 7, 5, and almost 2. Talk to their ped about testing via blood? I read there's a University of Chicago link I should check, correct? Is there a difference in testing them if I'm not Celiac vs just sensitive? I'm assuming so.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

It sounds like you have Celiac.

You can ask the doctor for copies of all your labs. It is important to keep track of them.

Talk to your Ped about your endo results and improvement with the gluten-free diet. Perhaps test only those kids with symptoms to start?

Anemia was my only symptom for celiac disease. My husband is not diagnosed formerly and has been gluten-free for 13 years. We did not test my daughter until we were sure the Affordable Healthcare Act was really in place since we are self-employed and did not need her to be uninsurable, like I was. She had no symptoms, no anemia and her CDs tests were negative. She will get re-tested every few years. So, there is no huge rush to test your kids if they do not have symptoms.

thepeach80 Rookie
thepeach80
Posted
  • Author

I just realized my GI now has a patient portal so I can I have access to my past blood work. I just signed up and sent a message to add my past blood work on there so I can see what I've been tested for and the results. Is it worth doing the gene testing on myself and the children? I have 2 kids I am more concerned about than the others.

cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

The gene test is a good tool used to rule out celiac disease when celiac disease blood tests or biopsies are inconclusive. Some 30% of folks carry the genes, but only a small amount (less than 1%??) develop celiac disease. You can see that just the gene test is not very helpful.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,685
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    tdouglas2901
    Newest Member
    tdouglas2901
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Rejoicephd · Posted

      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.