Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is A Biopsy Necessary For Me?


aliandsander

Recommended Posts

aliandsander Newbie

My 6 year old daughter was recently diagnosed with Celiac, (positive blood work and biopsy confirmed).  I suspected Celiac for her because my brother has it.   The whole family was then tested and my blood work came back positive (ttg ,72- even though by that time I was already eating a mostly gluten free diet).  

 

My question is- do I really need a biopsy to confirm diagnosis at this point?  I'm having a difficult time getting in to a GP for a referral to a gastro- I'm anxious to start my gluten free diet.  Though I didn't have many symptoms, I am hopeful and looking forward to improved stomach issues with the gluten-free diet.  It's hard to continue eating gluten while I wait.  Any thoughts on whether the biopsy seems necessary for me would be greatly appreciated

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nvsmom Community Regular

I think for most adults, getting the biopsy done is a personal choice.  Some like to have it done so they are absolutely sure they need to go gluten-free, but that sometimes backfires as false negative biopsies are not rare.  Others like to know what starting point their intestinal damage is at in case they want to come back and check it.  Medically, I do not think the endoscopy is helpful except if you need to recheck progress with the biopsy, and not many people do that.

 

With a positive test, and a strong family history of celiac disease, it is probably celiac disease, but do what you feel most comfortable with. 

 

Best wishes with whatever you decide.

aliandsander Newbie

I think for most adults, getting the biopsy done is a personal choice.  Some like to have it done so they are absolutely sure they need to go gluten-free, but that sometimes backfires as false negative biopsies are not rare.  Others like to know what starting point their intestinal damage is at in case they want to come back and check it.  Medically, I do not think the endoscopy is helpful except if you need to recheck progress with the biopsy, and not many people do that.

 

With a positive test, and a strong family history of celiac disease, it is probably celiac disease, but do what you feel most comfortable with. 

 

Best wishes with whatever you decide.

Thank you, Nicole!  

SoLacey Newbie

I asked my doctor if I should have the endoscopy because I wasn't able to get a positive blood test but I have so many symptoms that are indicative of Celiac.  All of which improved on a gluten free diet.  My iron, vitamin B and D were low, liver enzymes were high, estrogen was practically non-existent, my blood sugar was fluctuating from at times very high and others very low levels.  Those were the things we could see a marked difference on paper, they all returned to normal levels after having been gluten free for a couple of months. 

 

Other symptoms like exhaustion, aches and pains, brain fog etc also went away.  They also feel that the reactions I have to gluten are way to violent not to be Celiac.  I wondered if I needed an on paper diagnosis though.  It sometimes bothers me that I don't have it, especially when people question how I can be sure.  My doctor said "You know you have it, I know you have it, there's no reason to do the endoscopy".  Not sure if that helps. 

aliandsander Newbie

I asked my doctor if I should have the endoscopy because I wasn't able to get a positive blood test but I have so many symptoms that are indicative of Celiac.  All of which improved on a gluten free diet.  My iron, vitamin B and D were low, liver enzymes were high, estrogen was practically non-existent, my blood sugar was fluctuating from at times very high and others very low levels.  Those were the things we could see a marked difference on paper, they all returned to normal levels after having been gluten free for a couple of months. 

 

Other symptoms like exhaustion, aches and pains, brain fog etc also went away.  They also feel that the reactions I have to gluten are way to violent not to be Celiac.  I wondered if I needed an on paper diagnosis though.  It sometimes bothers me that I don't have it, especially when people question how I can be sure.  My doctor said "You know you have it, I know you have it, there's no reason to do the endoscopy".  Not sure if that helps. 

I totally understand.  My extended family seems to have a hard enough time understanding why I'm so strict with my daughters diet.  Without the official diagnosis, I think I would end up feeling defensive all the time.  But I suppose a positive blood test and family history should be enough.  I'm starting to realize that I shouldn't have to prove myself to anyone- I know I have it, that should be enough.  Thanks.

BlessedMommy Rising Star

It's possible to be strict with your diet without having a fully confirmed DX. I'd be the first person to say that if you can get one, do it, because it makes things easier, but as an adult, you can still maintain a 100% gluten free life without one. I don't even have positive bloodwork, as I got hospitalized in the process of trying to get there and my doctor agreed that gluten caused the hospitalization, so my family and I feel that it's more prudent in my situation to just stick with 100% gluten-free.

 

Most people are not going to ask or care about the details of your lab tests, just let them know that it's imperative that you stay away from all traces of gluten and stick to preparing and bringing your own food. Talk to family and try to educate them if you can.

 

My inlaws are supportive of my diet and they went so far as to buy a brand new separate grill (voluntarily out of their own pocket!) for the gluten free people, to avoid cross contamination. I also keep a flexible plastic cutting board at my IL's.

nvsmom Community Regular

I totally understand.  My extended family seems to have a hard enough time understanding why I'm so strict with my daughters diet.  Without the official diagnosis, I think I would end up feeling defensive all the time.  But I suppose a positive blood test and family history should be enough.  I'm starting to realize that I shouldn't have to prove myself to anyone- I know I have it, that should be enough.  Thanks.

I skipped the biopsy myself; positive tests and a family history was enough for me too.... Once your family sees you sticking with the diet, they'll probably come around - mine did.  :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  • 1 month later...
aliandsander Newbie

Just wanted to follow up for anyone interested.  I finally got in touch with, through a recommendation, a great GE who recommended that I get a biopsy.  She felt it was important to get a baseline- to see how much damage has been done.  She also felt it would be smart, since I don't have a lot of noticeable  symptoms- just in case I wasn't actually incurring damage to my small intestine.

 

Anyway- my biopsy confirmed damage.  I have to say, I'm glad I did it.  For me personally, the peace of mind is worth it.  Now I won't ever second guess myself- and feel more confident standing up for myself.  Many of you might not need that, but I did.  Thanks again for all of your advice.

LauraTX Rising Star

That is great to hear you got some conclusive answers.

nvsmom Community Regular

I'm very glad that it worked out for you!  :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,197
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Joanne01
    Newest Member
    Joanne01
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
    • trents
      @JettaGirl, "Coeliac" is the British spelling of "celiac". Same disease. 
    • JettaGirl
      This may sound ridiculous but is this supposed to say Celiacs? I looked up Coeliacs because you never know, there’s a lot of diseases related to a disease that they come up with similar names for. It’s probably meant to say Celiacs but I just wanted to confirm.
    • JoJo0611
      I was told it was to see how much damage has been caused. But just told CT with contrast not any other name for it. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.