Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Correct Diagnosis?


ThisGalsGlutenFree

Recommended Posts

ThisGalsGlutenFree Rookie

I recently had a blood test because my doctor suspects that I have celiac disease.  The results, in her words, suggest that I carry the antibody for celiac disease: The ANA screen is negative (no titer performed), the tTG-IgA is negative (<1.2U/mL), but the tTG-IgG is positive (10.5 U/mL).

 

My doctor did not recommend further testing, such as a biopsy, to confirm the celiac diagnosis, but did recommend that I eat completely gluten-free and see a dermatologist to diagnose the rash that I have, that seems to be consistent with pictures and descriptions of dermatitis herpetiformis. I am seeing another doctor to manage my new diet, and she thinks that the positive tTG-IgG test, along with the other symptoms I have described (skin rash and some GI issues) are conclusive enough that I shouldn’t go to the expense and trauma of a biopsy.

 

Am I wrong to not pursue further testing? Do other diseases closely mimic celiac? And I’ve read that the IgG test is less specific than the IgA test for diagnosing celiac – has anyone else had a negative IgA test and positive IgG test and found that they do have celiac disease? Thanks in advance for your comments.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Doorknocker Newbie

My diagnosis was based on the same.  My celiac panel was most definitely positive, and that with the rash and my symptoms was enough for my doctor to diagnose me as celiac.  He didn't think I needed the expense and trauma and time for the biopsy.  He's a good doctor and I really like him.  If he thinks this is what it is, I'm going with it.  I definitely believed him when several of my symptoms went away.  I'm still fighting the horrible rash and I am still having other issues, but the big D that I used to have just about every day is rare now, and the bloating went down and the headaches went away. 

SMRI Collaborator

I recently had a blood test because my doctor suspects that I have celiac disease.  The results, in her words, suggest that I carry the antibody for celiac disease: The ANA screen is negative (no titer performed), the tTG-IgA is negative (<1.2U/mL), but the tTG-IgG is positive (10.5 U/mL).

 

My doctor did not recommend further testing, such as a biopsy, to confirm the celiac diagnosis, but did recommend that I eat completely gluten-free and see a dermatologist to diagnose the rash that I have, that seems to be consistent with pictures and descriptions of dermatitis herpetiformis. I am seeing another doctor to manage my new diet, and she thinks that the positive tTG-IgG test, along with the other symptoms I have described (skin rash and some GI issues) are conclusive enough that I shouldn’t go to the expense and trauma of a biopsy.

 

Am I wrong to not pursue further testing? Do other diseases closely mimic celiac? And I’ve read that the IgG test is less specific than the IgA test for diagnosing celiac – has anyone else had a negative IgA test and positive IgG test and found that they do have celiac disease? Thanks in advance for your comments.

 

Did they test your total IgA ?  It's very possible that is low and you won't get a positive ttIgA, but could still have celiac. Your IgG is barely positive so it could be that you just haven't had it long enough to really spike.  Do you have a listing of all of the tests they ran?

ThisGalsGlutenFree Rookie

Did they test your total IgA ?  It's very possible that is low and you won't get a positive ttIgA, but could still have celiac. Your IgG is barely positive so it could be that you just haven't had it long enough to really spike.  Do you have a listing of all of the tests they ran?

 

Thanks to both of you for your replies! SMRI, my doctor did not order a total IgA. She ordered tTG IgA & IgG, ANA, CBC & platelets, and a comprehensive metabolic panel. I believe that the CBC was run because she suspected that my weeping rash was a staph infection (it was not). I remember that when my doctor called with results, she said that I had a low positive, or something to that effect.

Georgia-guy Enthusiast

Thanks to both of you for your replies! SMRI, my doctor did not order a total IgA. She ordered tTG IgA & IgG, ANA, CBC & platelets, and a comprehensive metabolic panel. I believe that the CBC was run because she suspected that my weeping rash was a staph infection (it was not). I remember that when my doctor called with results, she said that I had a low positive, or something to that effect.

There is nothing requiring a biopsy for celiac diagnosis. The doctor can make a diagnosis based on a combination of factors including blood tests, symptoms, rash biopsy, intestinal biopsy, and/or improvement on a gluten free diet with one of the above.

However, if I'm not mistaking, ANA (or Anti Nucleic Antibodies) is not a celiac test, I have only seen that test in connection with diagnosis of SLE (Systemic Lupus).

ThisGalsGlutenFree Rookie

There is nothing requiring a biopsy for celiac diagnosis. The doctor can make a diagnosis based on a combination of factors including blood tests, symptoms, rash biopsy, intestinal biopsy, and/or improvement on a gluten free diet with one of the above.

However, if I'm not mistaking, ANA (or Anti Nucleic Antibodies) is not a celiac test, I have only seen that test in connection with diagnosis of SLE (Systemic Lupus).

 

Please forgive my ignorance in including the ANA result; it was on the same page of the lab report as the celiac tests, so I wondered if I should include it. Thanks to each of you for your comments. I think I may be a bit in denial about having celiac disease.

Georgia-guy Enthusiast

Please forgive my ignorance in including the ANA result; it was on the same page of the lab report as the celiac tests, so I wondered if I should include it. Thanks to each of you for your comments. I think I may be a bit in denial about having celiac disease.

I wasn't saying it was ignorance including it, I just wanted to make sure that you (and your doctor) were aware that it's not a celiac test. In my experience, there are doctors who don't even know what tests are for celiac and what are not.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nora-n Rookie

was by chance the DGP test ordered?

SMRI Collaborator

Thanks to both of you for your replies! SMRI, my doctor did not order a total IgA. She ordered tTG IgA & IgG, ANA, CBC & platelets, and a comprehensive metabolic panel. I believe that the CBC was run because she suspected that my weeping rash was a staph infection (it was not). I remember that when my doctor called with results, she said that I had a low positive, or something to that effect.

 

It would be nice if dr's ordered complete tests to give the full picture of what is going on!!!  But, when all is said and done, a positive is a positive and the scope is just back up to the blood work.  Now, the actual scope and biopsy is pretty easy for you--but again, not really necessary.  I guess if I were your dr and got the lab results, I would have ordered a full IgG and IgA panel to see if those numbers were ok but I'm not your dr :D.  The next "test" is to see if you respond to a gluten-free diet.  Once your rash is looked at, start eating gluten-free.  If you see an improvement in symptoms, that will confirm your lab tests.

nora-n Rookie

there is  a DH folder here

nvsmom Community Regular

If you want more blood tests, there are a few you could request: DGP IgA, DGP IgG, EMA IgA, and possibly the older (and less reliable) AGA IgA and AGA IgG.  You'll need to still be eating gluten for them to be the most accurate.

 

I don't know is you need more tests though. The tTG IgG is about 95% specific to celiac disease, so a false positive would only happen 5% of the time (approximately).  It is not the most sensitive test though; I think it was less than the tTG IgA which means it would miss quite a few celiacs with false negatives.  I'm afraid that I'm away from home and don't have the links to back that info up.  This report has some info you could use though: Open Original Shared Link

 

BTW, I skipped the biopsy with a positive tTG IgA and EMA IgA, and I have no regrets.

 

Best wishes to you.

ThisGalsGlutenFree Rookie

The tTG IgA and tTG IgG were the only celiac tests ordered. Since finding this forum, I see that there are several other tests that could or should have been ordered. I've been eating gluten free for over two weeks now, so any other blood tests (and DH diagnosis?) would be skewed. I'm terrified of a challenge period to test again because the rash has been so hard to live with, but I'll do it if I must. I've started to see some improvement in the rash and with other symptoms the last few days, so I'm cautiously hopeful that the diagnosis was correct and I can get on with life.

 

Thanks for the heads-up on the DH forum!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - knitty kitty replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    2. - Jane02 replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    3. - knitty kitty replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    4. 0

      Penobscot Bay, Maine: Nurturing Gluten-Free Wellness Retreat with expert celiac dietitian, Melinda Dennis

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,329
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    klkarius
    Newest Member
    klkarius
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      @Jane02, I hear you about the kale and collard greens.  I don't do dairy and must eat green leafies, too, to get sufficient calcium.  I must be very careful because some calcium supplements are made from ground up crustacean shells.  When I was deficient in Vitamin D, I took high doses of Vitamin D to correct the deficiency quickly.  This is safe and nontoxic.  Vitamin D level should be above 70 nmol/L.  Lifeguards and indigenous Pacific Islanders typically have levels between 80-100 nmol/L.   Levels lower than this are based on amount needed to prevent disease like rickets and osteomalacia. We need more thiamine when we're physically ill, emotionally and mentally stressed, and if we exercise like an athlete or laborer.  We need more thiamine if we eat a diet high in simple carbohydrates.  For every 500 kcal of carbohydrates, we need 500-1000 mg more of thiamine to process the carbs into energy.  If there's insufficient thiamine the carbs get stored as fat.  Again, recommended levels set for thiamine are based on minimum amounts needed to prevent disease.  This is often not adequate for optimum health, nor sufficient for people with absorption problems such as Celiac disease.  Gluten free processed foods are not enriched with vitamins like their gluten containing counterparts.  Adding a B Complex and additional thiamine improves health for Celiacs.  Thiamine is safe and nontoxic even in high doses.  Thiamine helps the mitochondria in cells to function.  Thiamine interacts with each of the other B vitamins.  They are all water soluble and easily excreted if not needed. Interesting Reading: Clinical trial: B vitamins improve health in patients with coeliac disease living on a gluten-free diet https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19154566/ Safety and effectiveness of vitamin D mega-dose: A systematic review https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34857184/ High dose dietary vitamin D allocates surplus calories to muscle and growth instead of fat via modulation of myostatin and leptin signaling https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38766160/ Safety of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31746327/ Vitamins and Celiac Disease: Beyond Vitamin D https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11857425/ Investigating the therapeutic potential of tryptophan and vitamin A in modulating immune responses in celiac disease: an experimental study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40178602/ Investigating the Impact of Vitamin A and Amino Acids on Immune Responses in Celiac Disease Patients https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10814138/
    • Jane02
      Thank you so much @knitty kitty for this insightful information! I would have never considered fractionated coconut oil to be a potential source of GI upset. I will consider all the info you shared. Very interesting about the Thiamine deficiency.  I've tracked daily averages of my intake in a nutrition software. The only nutrient I can't consistently meet from my diet is vitamin D. Calcium is a hit and miss as I rely on vegetables, dark leafy greens as a major source, for my calcium intake. I'm able to meet it when I either eat or juice a bundle of kale or collard greens daily haha. My thiamine intake is roughly 120% of my needs, although I do recognize that I may not be absorbing all of these nutrients consistently with intermittent unintentional exposures to gluten.  My vitamin A intake is roughly 900% (~6400 mcg/d) of my needs as I eat a lot of sweet potato, although since it's plant-derived vitamin A (beta-carotene) apparently it's not likely to cause toxicity.  Thanks again! 
    • knitty kitty
      Hello, @Jane02,  I take Naturewise D 3.  It contains olive oil.   Some Vitamin D supplements, like D Drops, are made with fractionated coconut oil which can cause digestive upsets.  Fractionated coconut oil is not the same as coconut oil used for cooking.  Fractionated coconut oil has been treated for longer shelf life, so it won't go bad in the jar, and thus may be irritating to the digestive system. I avoid supplements made with soy because many people with Celiac Disease also react to soy.  Mixed tocopherols, an ingredient in Thornes Vitamin D, may be sourced from soy oil.  Kirkland's has soy on its ingredient list. I avoid things that might contain or be exposed to crustaceans, like Metagenics says on its label.  I have a crustacean/shellfish/fish allergy.  I like Life Extension Bioactive Complete B Complex.  I take additional Thiamine B 1 in the form Benfotiamine which helps the intestines heal, Life Extension MegaBenfotiamine. Thiamine is needed to activate Vitamin D.   Low thiamine can make one feel like they are getting glutened after a meal containing lots of simple carbohydrates like white rice, or processed gluten free foods like cookies and pasta.   It's rare to have a single vitamin deficiency.  The water soluble B Complex vitamins should be supplemented together with additional Thiamine in the form Benfotiamine and Thiamine TTFD (tetrahydrofurfuryl disulfide) to correct subclinical deficiencies that don't show up on blood tests.  These are subclinical deficiencies within organs and tissues.  Blood is a transportation system.  The body will deplete tissues and organs in order to keep a supply of thiamine in the bloodstream going to the brain and heart.   If you're low in Vitamin D, you may well be low in other fat soluble vitamins like Vitamin A and Vitamin K. Have you seen a dietician?
    • Scott Adams
      I do not know this, but since they are labelled gluten-free, and are not really a product that could easily be contaminated when making them (there would be not flour in the air of such a facility, for example), I don't really see contamination as something to be concerned about for this type of product. 
    • trents
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.