Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Who To See?


fetchfelix

Recommended Posts

fetchfelix Rookie

So it looks like I have celiac disease. This is an autoimmune disease. My brother has RA, my son has CVID and celiac disease. My Mom had her thyroid removed when I was 6 weeks old (no idea why and she is iong dead). 

 

Who should I see? a GI Dr, Immunologist, or a Rhumatologist? Or all three? I read somewhere, don't change your diet until you've been tested / screened for everything that can be related. My regular Dr has just sent me to see a GI Dr in the future at some point but is just telling me to go gluten free now. Im just wondering what screening I might need, and who to really see. Any advice warmly welcomed. 

 

Felix


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

Do not stop eating gluten until all testing is complete. Your GI might want to do an endoscopy (biopsies) of the small intestine to check for villi damage. If you are satisfied with just the blood test and the doctor is willing to diagnose you on just that one test, then why bother going to a GI?

Based on your earlier posts, in order to maintain the gluten-free diet, you would be better off knowing without a doubt that you have celiac disease.

But the decision is yours.....

fetchfelix Rookie

I posted my labs earlier, my understanding is that this is pretty definitive already. The only purpose of the endoscopy is to confirm the diagnosis and see what damage has been done. I just know that due to my work schedule, and about to travel to China for 3 weeks I won't be able to get an endoscopy for a while anyway. I really don't want to bother seeing ANY more Drs. I've truly had my fill these last few years, if there's really nothing to do but go gluten-free & recheck labs in 2-3 years I don't need to see a GI or any other Dr every 3-6months, It all takes time, money & co-pays! I go regularly for my diabetes anyway, if this is  something that can just be managed by regular Dr without any further testing that would be fine by me!

 

Felix

cyclinglady Grand Master

Okay, you do not need further testing.

My husband went gluten free at the advice of his GP and my allergist 13 years ago. He faithfully adheres to the diet. I was diagnosed over a year ago. My blood test was barely positive. I knew what going gluten-free was going to be like. So I went with the endoscopy in order for me to really stick to the diet. I have been allergic (like my siblings) to milk, nuts and eggs since I was young. I was not going to cut out any more foods from my diet without definitive proof (little did I know I would later have to give up most carbs for diabetes, Ha!). I was just shocked that both of us would have gluten issues. And later I was shocked about my diabetes diagnosis.

I think that if you have been questioning your blood test results, further testing might be worth it in your case. But you know yourself best and it is up to you to decide. In any case, there is no " falling off the wagon".

I wish you well!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,439
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lillian Steele
    Newest Member
    Lillian Steele
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.