Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Diagnosis?


rpbelize

Recommended Posts

rpbelize Newbie

Okay, so I am just now researching this, but three months ago my doctor diagnosed me with Celiac. I immediately went off gluten. Now I am questioning...

 

I don't have classic gut issues, except on very rare occasions. I mainly have hormone imbalances (estrogen, progesterone, and thyroid), severe migraine headaches, lots of pelvic pain, tiredness, etc. In a panel that tested for a lot of other things my doctor pointed out the following:

 

Gliadin Antibody, IgA - 19

Gliadin antibody,IgG - 54

Tissue Transglutaminase antibody, IgA - 36

tTG, IgG - 7

 

I also have insulin resistance, Lots of inflammation (Lp-PLA - 244, hs-CRP - 1.4), and low Iron (Ferritin - 10)

 

She didn't say anything about a biopsy, and at 3 months gluten-free, I don't suppose I could have a biopsy without a gluten challenge. Are the numbers high enough to be Celiac without a biopsy?

 

I just don't want to go down the road of thinking this is causing all my problems, only to discover no change and years down the road try to figure what really is the source.

 

She felt that the reason why I was having such hormonal issues was the Celiac was blocking my absorption of the hormones. This was also causing the insulin resistance. Does that sound reasonable?

 

Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

Yes,I think you are on the right track. Based on your lab results (helps to have the lab ranges as each lab varies though), I would say that you have Celiac Disease. I had the biopsy because only one of my celiac disease blood tests was positive. I was "on the fence". Plus, I was scheduled for a routine colonoscopy anyway......and I need a firm diagnosis as my husband has been gluten-free for thirteen years and I knew what it meant! I could not believe that we would both have it.

My insulin resistance did not improve on a gluten-free diet. It just got worse. I am a diabetic diagnosed a year after my celiac disease diagnosis (type not determined). I suggest you do some research on diabetes. I was shocked! What give up more foods? But I bought a cheap meter right away and began testing. Yep, I had issues with carbs. I took all my data into my doctor who agreed that I had diabetes. I went on a LCHF diet that keeps my meter readings in a safe zone. My doctor is even more impressed with my cholesterol results (increase my HDL that was way too low). We are continuing our "clinical study" on my husband who does not have an insulin resistance problem but has high cholesterol and could stand to lose some weight.

I am hoping that when I need diabetes meds (Metformin) my gut will be healed as most wreak havoic on your gut and mine is already damaged.

I, too hoped that my insulin resistance was related to celiac disease, but it appears that it is not.

Carpool time!

frieze Community Regular

insulin resistance, is commonly  a carb issue.  not just celiac.....

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,440
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lillian Steele
    Newest Member
    Lillian Steele
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.