Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Likely Are Lab Errors?


Brit1612

Recommended Posts

Brit1612 Apprentice

We have been anxiously waiting doing our sons bloodwork, post gluten challenge, since it will be the first time ALL the correct test are being ran, while being on gluten.

 

I am going to give you the original results (WHILE GLUTEN FREE) and then the results I saw yesterday..... (I can't help but wonder "are these even accurate?)

 

On Gluten-FREE diet:

 

ttg igg -- 15 (positive - reference range is <6 for negative)

dgp igg -- 3 (negative -reference range is < 20)

 

After 10 weeks of gluten challenge:

 

ttg igg -- < .8

dgp igg -- < .4

 

Serum IGA -- 9 (reference for his age should be > 30 I believe.

Serum IGM -- 45 (said "low" on the sheet but I don't know what the range should be for a 2 year old)

 

The IgA based test were negative both times, but considering the low IGA level I'm assuming that is irrelevant.

 

 

I have not heard from the GI about her interpretation of the results.  Am I wrong to think these results just seem weird!  I am happy they are negative, but I don't know if I should trust them or not.  Would his ttg igg level drop all the way down to less than one in a matter of 2 months (while eating gluten)?  

 

Do these results really indicate that he does NOT have celiac after all?????  

 

I have heard a lot about low IGA being more common in celiacs, but does anyone know what it could mean that both his IGA and IGM was low? (IGG and IGE were both in normal ranges)

 

One more question, he is on ammoxicilin for a sinus infection.  He had been on it about 3 days before the test, could this affect the results at all?  THanks again for all the support.

 

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

I do not know! Sorry! My heart goes out to you. Diagnosing tiny children can be difficult. There are so many scenarios and his case is a bit strange. I did read in Dr. fansano's, "Guten Freedom" that "10 to 20 percent of celiac disease patients test negative to serology screening tests." With his serum IGA deficiency and both positive and negative blood tests, coming up with a definitive answer is definitely beyond most of us here on this forum.

Has he been tested for genetic markers? Though....some 2 or 3 celiac patients do not have these genes.

Ugh! It is hard to say.

Keep us posted on what your doctor advises.

Oh, I think steroids can impact test results but not antibiotics, but ask your doctor about how fighting an infection might affect antibody results.

nvsmom Community Regular

I think false positives are fairly rare.  This report, on page 12, discusses how accurate the positives are for celiac disease (specificity)  and they are quite high, but I am not sure if that includes lab error.

Open Original Shared Link

 

I think it is more likely that his body's inflammation went down along with his overdone autoimmune response.  Labs can vary day to day and week to week.  If you continue to worry, then retest and if it is negative then continue to retest every 6 months for a year or so to make sure he is not hurting himself with gluten....But if he had symptoms, and had positive tests, then chances are it is celiac disease.  I am afraid that I have never seen someone have two positive tests and not have celiac disease.  :(

Brit1612 Apprentice

Thank y'all for replying.  I don't think the original results were wrong, considering he showed positive two different times for the ttg igg, but I have a hard time understanding how he would be positive while gluten free, and now be negative after a gluten challenge????  I guess I was wondering how likely it was that these most recent (negative results) were wrong?

 

As for the accuracy of the positive test, the link shared does not mention ttg igg, most of the articles I have ready only mention the ttg iga.  The doctors do not seem to think that the igg version of the test (which is the one he was positive for) is specific to celiac.

 

It is so confusing and frustrating.  Especially because he did have "classic celiac symptoms" but now (only after re-introducing gluten) he seems much better.....

 

We are scheduled for the colonoscopy and upper GI on Feb 6th.

 

Thanks again!

nvsmom Community Regular

Oops. You're right.  

 

This is the link I often refer to when the tTG IgG is discussed. It shows the specificity is about the same as the tTG IGA (if a tiny tiny bit better) but the sensitivity is much lower - it can miss more celiacs than it catches...

Open Original Shared Link

 

Good luck on the 6th.  What will they be looking for there.  Are they worried it could be crohn's?  :(

Brit1612 Apprentice

Thanks for the link.....I will check it out in just a second.  Not sure if she is looking for something specific with the colonoscopy or is just doing it because he is already going to be under.   She said she didn't want to have to do the colonoscopy later down the line if we were still needing results.  She specifically told me that with his positive reducing substance, positive ttg, and low Iga that she believes it is celiac.  We just haven't been able to prove it, but I don't know if her opinion will change after these last blood results (still waiting to hear from her). 

 

I have wondered if we should be concerned about Chron's but his issues have seemed to point at celiac more.  Do they resemble each other outwardly?

nvsmom Community Regular

The symptoms of crohn's can be similar to celiac disease but it is less common that celiac disease. Crohn's tends to affect the large intestine and the end of the small intestine - issues that can be seen in the colonoscopy.  With such a young guy, chances are it is not crohn's.  Your doctor probably just wants  to check everything.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Brit1612 Apprentice

That's what I figured.  I just keep doubting everything.  Keep asking myself "he seems normal now, should we even be doing another surgery....etc"  It's so hard when you are dealing with someone who can't even tell you how he's been feeling.  

 

Do any of you know anything about the low serum IGM?  Especially since he has low IGA as well.

 

Thanks

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,206
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    S.Craigwell
    Newest Member
    S.Craigwell
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.