Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Advice Needed Regarding My 10 Year Old Son.


knackeredcow

Recommended Posts

knackeredcow Newbie

Hi All,

I am very concerned about my son. I have always suspected a gluten issue but he has been tested negative 2 times now. Once when he was 5 and the last time around 6 months ago.
As he is 10 I don't often see his stool but a few times recently he didn't flush so his Dad and I both noticed his stool was very pale, fluffy looking and looked like there was lots of undigested food. I think this must be the way it is most of the time.
He is small for his age and I am concerned there might be a problem that is effecting his growth but at the same time the males in the family aren't too big so this might just be the way he is.
I am thinking he should go completely gluten free for 2 weeks to see if there is any improvement. Would this be long enough?
Is there another problem that might be causing this that any of you know of?
I want to have as mich information to take to the GP as possible as they are usually very good at fobbing me off!

Thanks in advance
 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nvsmom Community Regular

Welcome to the board.  I'm sorry your son hasn't been feeling well.

 

Only go gluten-free if you are satisfied that his testing is complete.  He must be eating gluten in the 2-3 months prior to (blood) testing for it to be accurate.  These are all of the celiac disease tests:

  • tTG igA and tTG IgG (tissue transglutaminase) - most common tests
  • DGP IgA and DGP IgG (deaminated gliadin peptides) - good for detecting early celiac disease , and for testing kids
  • EMA IGA (endomysial antibodies) - similar to the tTG iGA but detects more advanced disease
  • total serum IgA - a control test
  • AGA IgA and AGA IgG (anti-gliadin antibodies) - older and less reliable tests largely replaced by the DGP tests
  • endoscopic biopsy - 6+ samples taken

None of those tests are perfect.  It is quite common for celiacs to be positive in only one or two tests yet negative in the rest - including the biopsy.  Most tests have a sensitivity around 75-85% so some celiacs do get missed.  If you run all the tests, your chances of having accurate tests increases.

 

This report has more info on the tests:  Open Original Shared Link

An article on how symptoms can't be relied upon in kids to diagnose celiac disease: Open Original Shared Link

 

If you are satisfied testing is done, and is negative, then trying the gluten-free to check for non-celiac gluten intolerance (NCGI or NCGS) is a good idea.  You may need to give it more than two weeks though.  Generally, most people will notice a difference in post meal stomach aches and bloating within a few days, but other symptoms may take weeks or months to improve.  I was still noticing improvements at over one year gluten-free (but celiacs seem to recover a bit slower).  Keep a food and symptom journal to keep track of the changes.

 

Hypothyroidism can also affect digestion and slows growth. Check for TSH (should be about a 1), free T4 and free T3 (should be in the 50-75% range of the normal range), and TPO Ab.

 

Celiacs and those with NCGS can be low in nutrients that can affect his growth and life.  Check for levels of: A, D, B12, Ca, K, Mg, Fe, Zn, Cu, ferritin.

 

BTW, I am a celiac and I suspected a problem in a couple of my children.  They were tested but only with the TTG IgA (all that was available) and it was negative.  I made them gluten-free anyways and they improved quite a bit.  They have no dianosis of anything but they feel better... that's all that matters.

 

Best wishes.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,439
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lillian Steele
    Newest Member
    Lillian Steele
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.