Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Long After Starting A Gluten Free Diet Will Symptoms Recede?


Omiak

Recommended Posts

Omiak Newbie

Went to my doctor originally thinking I have a stomach parasite. I've had some recurring digestion issues that started just after I returned from a bicycle tour in central america (I drank the water a lot of places I probably shouldn't have).

 

The doctor did a blood test and told me I have Celiacs disease. My tissue transgutimase results were abnormal (a 21 with normal range being 0-19). He refused to write a referral to get a biopsy by a gastroenterologist (no idea why). I'd read that the biopsy is necessary to diagnose celiacs disease so I went to another doctor and asked for a referral. He told me that I probably didn't have celiacs disease and wrote me the referral to speak to the gastroenterologist but they couldn't get me in for over a month and a half. In the meantime I've been gluten free for a little over two weeks and my symptoms haven't changed. I did accidentally eat falafel once in the middle there.

 

I'm aware that I need to be on a gluten diet for an extended period before I have the biopsy.

 

Just wondering if anyone knows if two weeks of eating gluten free is normally enough time to see some change or reduction in symptoms. Any insight would be appreciated.

 

Thanks.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

No, it can takes months to YEARS to have symptoms resolve! Some people do not have any symptoms at all!

I would strongly do some research. The University of Chicago has a great celiac website and discusses testing. Doctors, even GI doc get it wrong all the time. Just read all the threads in this forum.

You do have to be eating gluten to get tested. Since you are just mildly positive, I would take the blood test over in a few weeks after consuming gluten and ask for biopsies (up to six).

I was barely positive and my biopsy showed a moderate to severe damage. My only symptom was anemia at the time of my diagnosis. ,

You could also still have a parasite issue on top of celiac disease. Was that eliminated?

Here is a list of the tests:

-tTG IgA and tTG IgG

-DGP IgA and DGP IgG

-EMA IgA

-total serum IgA and IgG (control test)

-AGA IGA and AGA IgG - older and less reliable tests largely replace by the DGP tests

-endoscopic biopsy - make sure at least 6 samples are taken

Welcome to the forum and let us know how it goes!

Omiak Newbie

Thanks. It seems much more reasonable to me to get the biopsy right away rather than to try and spend months or years trying to diagnose myself by trial and error with the diet. I'm not sure why the first doctor I saw refused to write the reference. I asked both doctors this question about how long it would take to see improvement by changing my diet and both of them said they didn't know.

 

DGP IgA and IgG were both negative (9 and 4 respectively).

 

I was given metronidazole for possible parasite issues but it did not resolve my symptoms. I know that some stomach parasites are treated with other drugs such as praziquantel, but I'm not sure if those parasites are immune to treatment with metronidazole. Things to ask the GI specialist I suppose.

cyclinglady Grand Master

Obtaining a biopsy is still considered the "gold standard" by leading experts in diagnosing celiac disease. It is nice to know or have a benchmark of damage and to check for cancer.

My husband went gluten-free 14 years ago per the advice of my allergist and his GP. It worked. He feels great. But he would be the first to tell you that I get a ton of support from family, friends and medical staff having a firm celiac disease diagnosis two years ago. Plus, our doctor did not blink an eye when we asked (and will continue to ask) for testing for our kid even though she is symptom free!

There is no way for my husband to do a gluten challenge. He knows and we know that gluten makes him sick, but it took a lot of trial and error and that constant wondering if he really has celiac disease (though we are pretty sure since autoimmune disease runs very strongly in our families -- kid is doomed!)

I wish you well!

Oh, and a biking adventure! Maybe when I retire!

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Did your doctor do stool testing to check for parasites? If not that should be done. The medication that you were given does have D as a side effect so even if the diet was helping (if you are in fact celiac) the side effects of the med may be masking any improvement. 

 Meanwhile get back on gluten and get full panels done along with the biopsy. How soon it takes to improve on the diet varies. For some folks it takes a long time to see symptom resolution but for others it can happen pretty quickly. In my own case the digestive issues cleared up within days (although mistakes on the diet brought them back full force until I eliminated all sources of CC) but other problems took much longer to resolve. 

Hope this gets figured out and you are feeling better soon. 

nvsmom Community Regular

Just wondering if anyone knows if two weeks of eating gluten free is normally enough time to see some change or reduction in symptoms. Any insight would be appreciated.

 

 

In some people, two weeks on the gluten-free diet is enough to see improvements in some symptoms, although not all.  I had less bloating and fewer stomach aches within days of going gluten-free.  Headaches and a few other symptoms were getting better at about a month gluten-free.  After a year gluten-free, my arthritis improved.  It really depends on the person and the symptoms.

 

Also, some people get worse before they get better.  I had withdrawal for about 10 days - I still remember that headache.  after 2-3 months gluten-free, my arthritis and fatigue became much worse.  I really started to feel like I was getting well after being gluten-free for 6 months.  2 weeks is really nothing.  :(

 

I am somewhere between both of those doctors; I think your weak positive tTG IgA probably points to celiac disease because 95% of positive tTG IgA tests are from celiac disease.  Those weak positives are usually the ones caused by other issues (like crohn's, colitis, thyroiditis, liver disease, diabetes, or a serious infection) when it is not caused by celiac disease (which it usually is).  My guess is that you probably have celiac disease, but can't state it with 100% certainty.  

 

The biopsy requires a gluten challenge of 2-4 weeks of eating about 1/2 to 4 (1-2 is average) slices of bread per day.  If a biopsy is ordered you will need to resume gluten.  If your Gastro wants to retest, you should go back on gluten immediately because 2-3 months of gluten is needed for accurate blood tests. You may not want to go gluten-free yet.

 

If you retest your tTG IgA after some months gluten-free, and your result is down, that could also be confirmation of a celiac disease diagnosis.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.