Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

GI says Celiac but blood work negative


Tree75

Recommended Posts

Tree75 Newbie

Hi- I'm looking for advice. Here's my story...

In June, I suddenly had no energy. I went from running a hilly 1/2 marathon one weekend to not being able to run a mile the next weekend (literally). I battled that extreme fatigue for a month or 2 until I finally promised my spouse I would see a doc about it. (in addition to the fatigue, I was very bloated and I gained about 25 pounds... I assumed the weight gain was because my exercise training schedule shifted so radically).

In August, I went to the doc who diagnosed me with anemia. I was told my iron was at a 4...she didn't believe supplements or diet changes would help me. She set me up for iron infusions instead. And she wanted me to get an EGD and colonoscopy to rule out internal bleeding.

I just had the EGD and colonoscopy last week. While I was in recovery, the GI doc came and told my spouse and I that he was confident I had Celiac based on the pictures he took (he showed us... my intestines looked wrinkled and flat). I asked him if anything else could explain the way my intestines looked and his response was, "I highly doubt it. This is a classic example of what Celiac looks like. But we'll see what the blood work says".

Well, I just got back the results of the blood work and I tested negative for celiac. And that's where things are left right now. I have a follow up with the GI doc in 3 weeks, but in the meantime my spouse (who is uber-concerned about me) is insisting I eat gluten-free.

I guess I'm curious if this situation has happened to anyone else (meaning your GI doc says Celiac but the blood work is negative)? Other than the iron issue, I've felt fine. I don't feel sick when I eat gluten and I don't have the symptoms that a lot of people describe. Big picture though...I'm worried that the anemia will continue and I'm worried why my intestines look the way they do. It's got me confused because the GI doc was so confident that it was Celiac, and in my experience, docs tend to be reluctant to confidently say what's going on, especially before the blood work comes in.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

Welcome!

Exactly what blood tests were taken?  Was it a complete celiac panel?   Often, doctors order just the TTG.  For the past decade, the TTG was a great test for screening (cheap and effective), but they found that it did not catch all celiacs (like me who tests negative to the TTG tests).  Only one of the tests needs to be positive -- not all! 

-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA and (tTG) IgG
-Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) IgA and (DGP) IgG
-EMA IgA 
-total serum IgA (in celiac disease testing this is a control test)
 
How many biopsies were taken?  Did you receive a pathologist's report in addition to your GI's visual assessment?  
 
-endoscopic biopsy - make sure at least 6 samples are taken
 
Anemia is now one of the most common symptoms of celiac disease.  If you are diagnosed with celiac disease, a few months of a gluten free diet and some gluten-free iron supplements should increase your ferritin levels (iron stores).  
 
Other things can can cause intestinal damage that is comparable to celiac disease.  Make sure that your doctor ordered the complete panel.  Some people do test negative to all the celiac blood tests.  In that case a trial gluten-free diet is usually suggested.  
 
Weird that you were able to run the 1/2 marathon, but that is what happened to me.  Funny how your body can adapt and push on when you have a goal!  
 
So, based on what you wrote, I am not sure if full testing (blood and biopsies) was done.  Please verify by obtaining copies of all your lab results.    If the testing was not complete, ask for complete testing. Consider another opinion.      Keep eating gluten until all testing (or a second GI consult) is complete.  
Tree75 Newbie

Thanks for the quick reply! This is weighing heavily on my mind and it's hard to wait 3 weeks for the follow up appointments.

Well, I just went into my records to find the blood work results and a message popped up that said my biopsy results were in and they were negative for celiac. So, I guess the cause of what I'm experiencing isn't celiac but something else. So, I guess I'll continue my search for answers.

 

Thanks for all your help!

 

squirmingitch Veteran

Reading this, it didn't sound like the GI doc took biopsies until I just read your last post. I'm so glad he did! I couldn't understand why he would say it looked like celiac but not take biopsies.

Okay, so now you're looking for what else could cause this. Persist, persist, persist!

I wish you the best & hope you find the answer very soon. When you do, would you please try to remember to come back & let us know? Even though you aren't celiac we still care and it could also help others who have the same thing happen.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,442
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Nony
    Newest Member
    Nony
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.