Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Should I do a gluten challenge on my own


im.really.a.mermaid

Recommended Posts

im.really.a.mermaid Newbie

Hi, this is my first time here ??

A bit of back story... I'm  41, and  have been mostly gluten-free for  7-8 months. I started feeling very nauseous and having bad episodes of diarrhea about that time and I started keeping track of what I was eating and realized I only got sick on the days I ate pastries,  bread or breaded products. So I thought I might be gluten intolerant and tried out a gluten-free diet. I started feeling better almost  immediately and i stopped having to spend my first year of marriage with the toilet more than my husband. Things that I didn't even think could be related to my  food, like joint pain, chronic migraines, and panic attacks  started to get better and some went away completely.

My  husband made me go to the Dr to get tested for a bunch of things because I'm extremely tired all the time and I asked to be tested for celiac to. I got  most of my labs right away and I had low folic acid and  vitamin D. Then today the Dr says my results for celiac are negative and is going to send me to a gastro Dr to see if they can find out what's wrong. 

I get very sick very fast if I eat gluten on accident. The last time it happened I was given a couple of teaspoonful of sauce on top of my "gluten free" steak. I was on the toilet with in 45 mins. 

I have or have had so many symptoms that  sound like celiac disease, but am afraid that  maybe it's not that and I'm missing something else by blaming gluten. 

 

So I'm wondering if I should try to go back on gluten now and ask to be retested when I see the  gastro Dr, or  should I wait until I see them? 

 

Thanks for any advice you can give ❤️ 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master
5 hours ago, im.really.a.mermaid said:

Hi, this is my first time here ??

A bit of back story... I'm  41, and  have been mostly gluten-free for  7-8 months. I started feeling very nauseous and having bad episodes of diarrhea about that time and I started keeping track of what I was eating and realized I only got sick on the days I ate pastries,  bread or breaded products. So I thought I might be gluten intolerant and tried out a gluten-free diet. I started feeling better almost  immediately and i stopped having to spend my first year of marriage with the toilet more than my husband. Things that I didn't even think could be related to my  food, like joint pain, chronic migraines, and panic attacks  started to get better and some went away completely.

My  husband made me go to the Dr to get tested for a bunch of things because I'm extremely tired all the time and I asked to be tested for celiac to. I got  most of my labs right away and I had low folic acid and  vitamin D. Then today the Dr says my results for celiac are negative and is going to send me to a gastro Dr to see if they can find out what's wrong. 

I get very sick very fast if I eat gluten on accident. The last time it happened I was given a couple of teaspoonful of sauce on top of my "gluten free" steak. I was on the toilet with in 45 mins. 

I have or have had so many symptoms that  sound like celiac disease, but am afraid that  maybe it's not that and I'm missing something else by blaming gluten. 

 

So I'm wondering if I should try to go back on gluten now and ask to be retested when I see the  gastro Dr, or  should I wait until I see them? 

 

Thanks for any advice you can give ❤️ 

Most celiac experts advise being under a doctor’s care while attempting to do a gluten challenge.  You can be become pretty sick and react differently (usually worse based on forum member input).  

Your test results for celiac disease were most likely negative because you had been gluten free for so long (regardless of a few exposures).  All celiac testing requires you to be on a gluten diet.  You also might not have had the complete celiac panel either, but odds are the negative result was due to not consuming gluten daily.  

Consider the safe route.  If you find you can not tolerate gluten for 8 to 12 weeks for the blood test, your GI can order the endoscopy with only two weeks of gluten consumed daily.  Only you can decide what is best for you!  

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.