Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help with understanding biopsy and blood test reports


MikeMacKay

Recommended Posts

MikeMacKay Apprentice

I want to share my blood test results as well as my endoscopy to know from the forum if you think it's indicative of not being celiac disease or if you think I should be tested again. 

Here are some of the results I got back which was in 2017: 

Celiac Disease - Serum/Plasma (Final) 

Gliadin Antibody IgG    Less than 0.5          <12.0
Negative
IgG antibody to demiadated gliadin has approximately 95 per cent sensitivity and 95 per cent specificity for celiac disease. Deamidated gliadin IgG has particular utility in the detection of celiac disease in children younger than 2 years old and those with IgA deficiency. Tested by a multiplex flow immunoassay (Bioplex) method. 

- Tissue Transglutaminase antibody IgA     Less than 0.5      <12.0 

Negative 

IgA antyibody to tissue transglutaminase has approximately 95 per cent sensitivity and 95 per cent specificity for celiac disease. False negative results may occur with a gluten-restricted diet or iGa deficiency. The Bioplex method includes an internal control to confirm IgA is sufficient, thus avoiding false negatives due to IgA deficiency. 

Tested by a multiplex flow immunoassay (Bioplex) method.


Immunoglobins - Serum/Plasma (Final)

-IGG .       11.44               6.50-16.000 g/L
-IGA .        3.31 .               0.40-3.50 . g/L
- IGM .      0.56 .               0.50-3.00 g/L

 

Preoperative diagnosis: epigastric pain 

Postoperative diagnosis: antral erosions 

Procedure: The esophagus was intubated under direct vision. The esophagus was normal. The fundus and body were normal. The antrum showed some very small antral erosions. The duodenal cap and second and third part were normal. Biosipes were taken of the duodenum and cap. On retroflexion , the cardia and GE were normal.  There were some small antral erosions detected. Biospies were taken from the antrum. Upon withdrawl, the esophagus was normal. 

 

Biospy

Final diagnosis 

- no pathology diagnosis 
-negative for specific pathogens or villous atrophy 

gastric biopsy 

antral and body type mucosa

no pathology diagnosis 

negative for heliobacter pylori 

And it looks like 4 pieces were taken from the gastric biospy for and 4 pieces for the small bowel biopsy 

Can anyone make anything of what the results may indicate?  Do you think the results are pretty indicative or do you think I should be retested? 

Of note: all blood tests and procedures were done after being on the gluten diet for 8-12 weeks.

 

 

 

 

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master
9 hours ago, MikeMacKay said:

I want to share my blood test results as well as my endoscopy to know from the forum if you think it's indicative of not being celiac disease or if you think I should be tested again. 

Here are some of the results I got back which was in 2017: 

Celiac Disease - Serum/Plasma (Final) 

Gliadin Antibody IgG    Less than 0.5          <12.0
Negative
IgG antibody to demiadated gliadin has approximately 95 per cent sensitivity and 95 per cent specificity for celiac disease. Deamidated gliadin IgG has particular utility in the detection of celiac disease in children younger than 2 years old and those with IgA deficiency. Tested by a multiplex flow immunoassay (Bioplex) method. 

- Tissue Transglutaminase antibody IgA     Less than 0.5      <12.0 

Negative 

IgA antyibody to tissue transglutaminase has approximately 95 per cent sensitivity and 95 per cent specificity for celiac disease. False negative results may occur with a gluten-restricted diet or iGa deficiency. The Bioplex method includes an internal control to confirm IgA is sufficient, thus avoiding false negatives due to IgA deficiency. 

Tested by a multiplex flow immunoassay (Bioplex) method.


Immunoglobins - Serum/Plasma (Final)

-IGG .       11.44               6.50-16.000 g/L
-IGA .        3.31 .               0.40-3.50 . g/L
- IGM .      0.56 .               0.50-3.00 g/L

 

Preoperative diagnosis: epigastric pain 

Postoperative diagnosis: antral erosions 

Procedure: The esophagus was intubated under direct vision. The esophagus was normal. The fundus and body were normal. The antrum showed some very small antral erosions. The duodenal cap and second and third part were normal. Biosipes were taken of the duodenum and cap. On retroflexion , the cardia and GE were normal.  There were some small antral erosions detected. Biospies were taken from the antrum. Upon withdrawl, the esophagus was normal. 

 

Biospy

Final diagnosis 

- no pathology diagnosis 
-negative for specific pathogens or villous atrophy 

gastric biopsy 

antral and body type mucosa

no pathology diagnosis 

negative for heliobacter pylori 

And it looks like 4 pieces were taken from the gastric biospy for and 4 pieces for the small bowel biopsy 

Can anyone make anything of what the results may indicate?  Do you think the results are pretty indicative or do you think I should be retested? 

Of note: all blood tests and procedures were done after being on the gluten diet for 8-12 weeks.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I am not a doctor, but the celiac blood tests, the endoscopy and the biopsies did not reveal celiac disease.  Could they have missed damage in small intestine?  Maybe.  You could ask for the rest of the celiac panel which includes the TTG IgG, DGP IgA and the EMA.  Or find out the cause of your ulcer-like erosions (e.g. taking too many NSAIDS).  I hope you figure it out.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,630
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Tomas Maximiliano
    Newest Member
    Tomas Maximiliano
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      I think going back to your GI isn't a bad idea - my visits to the GI did not stop following my diagnosis as I had annoying issues on and off for some time.  Thankfully he is a fantastic GI, with  a great sense of humour, so it wasn't a chore to see him again although I'd rather not have had to, obviously!  But I needed my mind to be put at rest as my symptoms didn't seem to go away overnight as I'd hoped they would.  Initially I recall he recommended I went Dairy Free for three weeks, and he told me it would take that time to see an effect.  At that time, even lactose free milk went straight through me, so it is important, I would say, to even avoid that during a Dairy Free trial. My ongoing symptoms were bloating which did respond a bit to that trial.   However, within about 18 months there was a return to a very sore stomach, plus various aches and pains.   It turned out some gluten was sneaking in with my iron supplement (I was buying Floradix instead of Floravital), but I also think the dishwasher, the oven and eating out were contributors, too. Before my numbers normalised (from memory, about eight years!) I had several follow up appointments and a few more tests, but things gradually did get better.  Having read many accounts on this forum over the years, I don't think it is uncommon for symptoms to get a bit worse before getting better, that was certainly the case with me.  Your gut is damaged so you may well have issues digesting other food in the short term. But do try to be as scrupulously gluten free as you can possibly be as a first step, and I'd definitely try a three week Dairy Free trial.   Your villi because they are damaged are not able to create the lactase required to digest dairy at this time so you may well see some improvement if you come off dairy for a while.  Perhaps keeping a food diary of what you eat, where you eat it, whilst a bit onerous to do, will help identify foods that are causing issues.  For a while, apart from oats, I found peas, lentils and soya products hugely aggravating.  Things should calm down.
    • Rejoicephd
      Thankfully those are normal. B12 was on the low end of the normal range when I first got diagnosed. When I last got it checked, it had come up a lot (455 last time checked).
    • Scott Adams
      You can search this site for prescriptions medications, but will need to know the manufacturer/maker if there is more than one, especially if you use a generic version of the medication: To see the ingredients you will need to click on the correct version of the medication and maker in the results, then scroll down to "Ingredients and Appearance" and click it, and then look at "Inactive Ingredients," as any gluten ingredients would likely appear there, rather than in the Active Ingredients area. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/  I didn't notice any gluten ingredients in Kirkland Almond non-dairy beverage, however it does contain Locust Bean Gum. Some gums may cause IBS-type issues in some people with celiac disease or gluten sensitivity:    
    • trents
      Have you had B12 levels checked?
    • Rejoicephd
      For the past few months, I've been taking several supplements (a multi-vitamin, an iron supplement, a vitamin C supplement, and a magnesium supplement), all of which state that they are gluten free on the label.  
×
×
  • Create New...