Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

i have celiac right?


joe3530

Recommended Posts

joe3530 Newbie

Had low serum iron/iron binding capacity normal ferritin and mildly elevated LFTs after a whole host of neurological/gastrointestinal issues and chronic fatigue that did not away after resting up months after getting sick on a business trip OCT 2018.

immunoglobulin A = 329 (ref range 70-400)

deamidated gliadin antibodies = 101 (ref range 0-30)

TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE= >177 (ref range 0-20)

The NP GI who saw me did everything she could to get as much money as possible out of me (wanted to repeat Hep A/B/C testing despite me holding the results in my hands and tested me for all sorts of ridiculous liver issues thank god i rejected the biopsy, even after a totally normal liver ultrasound!) so I opted out of the endoscopy and wanted to work with my PCP who I trust much more

He advised to try eliminating gluten for proof of diagnosis as we both doubt I have had this for longer than the past 6 months. With results these strongly positive (and highly celiac specific with the gliadin) it would be wise to ignore the biopsy even if negative, correct? The way I saw it was I could suffer severely and eat gluten for another 3 months while I wait for a biopsy, pay another $2000 in follow ups and more tests and if its negative, I can't even prove its not celiac because maybe the damage hasnt occured, the biopsy wasnt read right, or enough samples werent taken!

Initial elimination of gluten went well started lightening up and feeling better, 2-4 weeks later symptoms started returning. 7 weeks in and still getting vague GI symptoms + fatigue (is this due to healing occuring? my CC controls aren't perfect yet i'll admit). I definitely have this with results like this right?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

I think you are doing the right thing.  Give it another month or even wait a full six months (since your symptoms improved and then came back) before checking your antibodies again.  Why?  The gluten-free diet has a steep learning curve.  Unless you were diagnosed at a major celiac center, chances are you got the “you have celiac disease.  Go gluten free and good luck!” speech like so many of us.  That means it is up to you and your family (maybe) to learn a complicated diet and more importantly, learn to deal with cross contamination.  It takes time.  Mistakes will be made.  It happens.  It WILL happen.   Your antibodies are high.  Every exposure at this point could increase them or keep them elevated.  For me, a hit, can mean months of feeling ill.  For hubby it is about a week.  Every person is different.

With two strongly positive test results, Your GP is right in my non-medical opinion.   Now, I am biopsied confirmed, but I luckily had excellent insurance.  I also wanted a biopsy because my hubby had been gluten free for 12 years and I knew exactly what a celiac disease diagnosis meant.  You are right in that even if your biopsy was negative (easy to miss damaged areas), you should still trial the diet.   What counts is feeling good.  If you should find that you are still not feeling better after months of being gluten free (even doing the Fasano diet which is basically no processed foods or eating out) you should reconsider the endoscopy.  Celiacs can have more than one autoimmune disorder and other issues like Small Intestinal  Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO) should be ruled out. Also keep a journal because I thought I was getting glutened but turns out Xanthan Gum which is used in Commercial gluten-free breads/flours was the culprit (my hubby is my canary).   Look for other intolerances which may resolve once your gut heals.  Leaky gut is real per this celiac expert:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wha30RSxE6w

I would save money and wait six months to master the diet and heal (though if really sick it could take a year or longer) before doing a repeat antibodies panel.   The point is to see if antibodies are declining.  Actually you might be able to check just the two tests you were positve on and save money.  Depends on the lab though.  

Even if you had liver issues and if it is due to celiac disease (which is systemic), it can resolve on the gluten-free diet.  

Fenrir Community Regular

You have the labs that are pretty specific to celiac disease so I believe you are as sure to have celiac disease as one can be without having the EGD done. I would get the EGD done if money isn't an issue but you could certainly just go gluten-free and if you improve then you are good to go. 

I had the EGD done because I maxed out my deductible and max out of pocket already. celiac disease resulted in me getting an MRI, CT scan, numerous labs, having my gallbladder out. I ended up having two EGDs, first one they just thought I had an ulcer so didn't take the biopsies needed. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol

    2. - barb simkin replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol

    3. - trents replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol

    4. - barb simkin replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,333
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    BeitAryeh
    Newest Member
    BeitAryeh
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      So, you had both and endoscopy with biopsy and a colonoscopy. That helps me understand what you were trying to communicate. No, no! It never occurred to me that you were trying to mislead me. It's just that we get a lot of posters on the forum who are misinformed about what celiac disease is and how it is diagnosed so I need some clarification from you which you were so gracious to give.
    • barb simkin
      I had both the genetic genes for celiac.  My gastroenologist advised he also took a biopsy during one of my colonoscopies and endoscopy and advised I had celiac disease, along with stomach ulcers from my esophagus stomach down to my small bowel. I was shown the ulcers on the catscan and endoscopy report.  I also had polyps in 3 places throughout my large bowel. I was on a strict diet for months following.  I am sorry if I didnt define how I was diagnosed with celiac disease.  I am sorry if you think I was misleading you. I also had to pay $150.00 for the genetic testing.
    • trents
      So, I'm a little confused here. I understand you to say that you have not been officially diagnosed with celiac disease. Is this correct?  You have had genetic testing done to check for the potential for developing celiac disease and that was positive. Is this correct? I think you meant to type "gluten sensitivity" but you typed "gluten insensitivity". Just so we are clear about the terminology, there is celiac disease and there is NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). They are not the same but they have overlapping symptoms. Celiac disease causes damage to the small bowel lining but NCGS does not. NCGS is often referred to in short form as gluten sensitivity. However, people often use the terms celiac disease and gluten sensitivity interchangeably so it can be unclear which disease they are referring to. Genetic testing cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease but it can be used to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population has one or both of  the genes that have been most strongly connected with the potential to develop active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develops active celiac disease. This makes the genetic test useful for ruling out celiac disease but not for diagnosing it. A colonoscopy cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease because it doesn't permit the scope to go up into the small bowel where celiac disease does the damage. They use an endoscopy ("upper GI) for checking the small bowel lining for celiac damage.
    • barb simkin
      I did nor read the chocolate pkg as it was of fered to me and I ate 2 pcs. I do know that only very dark chocolate and and a very few others are gluten free. Most alcohols contain gluten. I have several yrs of not knowing my celiac condition as docs would not do the test. After looking on the internet about my sufferings I insisted on the gene trsting which showed positive for gluten insensitivity and a biopsy on my next colonoscopy that also showed positive which could not help the damage done to my small bowel. So I very rarely have a glass of wine
    • trents
      @barb simkin, are you sure the chocolate products are gluten-free and not "manufactured on equipment that also handles wheat products and tree nuts", i.e., cross-contamination? And what kind of alcoholic beverages are we talking about? Most beers are made from gluten-containing grains. Just checking.
×
×
  • Create New...