Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

HLQ DQ2 DQ8 ??


JodieAL

Recommended Posts

JodieAL Newbie

Hi,

I am in the process of being tested for celiac. Having had a gastroscoposy, ( I was gluten free, but went back onto gluten for two weeks before, as the doctor recommended) but they lost my lab results ? so cannot confirm Celiac. 

My doctors have now done the genetic test HLA DQ, saying if I am positive they will do a enteroscopy. 

I have come back negative for DQ2 but positive for DQ8. Can anyone help explain what this means please!? 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

It means you have one of the genes associated with celiac disease.  It does not confirm celiac disease because some 30% of the population carries these genes but only a few go on to develop celiac disease.  

But more importantly......THEY LOST YOUR PATHOLOGY REPORT?  How awful!  Did the GI note anything on the endoscopy?  Did that report get lost too?   In the  past the endoscope was not able to visually see microscopic damage.  In my case, my last endoscopy you could actually see my healed villi.  My clinic had the newest scopes.  

Genes or not, you should consider reporting this error to the medical board and they should repeat the endoscopy regardless.  It sounds like you are in the UK since you called the scope by a different name.  Not sure what recourse you have.  

I hope it gets all sorted out.  My heart goes out to you if you have to do another gluten challenge.   

https://celiac.org/about-celiac-disease/screening-and-diagnosis/screening/

https://www.verywellhealth.com/celiac-gene-test-562532

JodieAL Newbie
7 hours ago, cyclinglady said:

It means you have one of the genes associated with celiac disease.  It does not confirm celiac disease because some 30% of the population carries these genes but only a few go on to develop celiac disease.  

But more importantly......THEY LOST YOUR PATHOLOGY REPORT?  How awful!  Did the GI note anything on the endoscopy?  Did that report get lost too?   In the  past the endoscope was not able to visually see microscopic damage.  In my case, my last endoscopy you could actually see my healed villi.  My clinic had the newest scopes.  

Genes or not, you should consider reporting this error to the medical board and they should repeat the endoscopy regardless.  It sounds like you are in the UK since you called the scope by a different name.  Not sure what recourse you have.  

I hope it gets all sorted out.  My heart goes out to you if you have to do another gluten challenge.   

https://celiac.org/about-celiac-disease/screening-and-diagnosis/screening/

https://www.verywellhealth.com/celiac-gene-test-562532

Thank you for your reply! You have clarified my confusion! 

Yes, I am based in the UK, and am going through this process with the NHS ( free healthcare available to all UK citizens) ...this situation is unfortunately not the first time I have personally encountered mistakes of this magnitude. I have also had colonoscopies done where biopsies were not taken, so deemed inconclusive, so ultimately pointless. Plus a number of other mistakes to numerous to list! Unfortunately we do not have the same resources here for formal complaints as you do in the US. 

The GI found no evidence of celiac during the gastroscopy ( but I’m now wondering if a two week gluten challenge was long enough)  I have Hashimotos, another autoimmune disease, osteoarthritis, IGA responses and DH blisters, plus gastrointestinal issues, hence the possibility of Celiac. 

Very interesting to know that that older scopes ( as probably used by the NHS) do not detect low levels of vili damage. 

I am dreading the thought of going back onto a Gluten challenge diet, but know I need to get a clear diagnosis for me, and my children. 

Thank you so much for your help! 

GFinDC Veteran

Hi,

If you have DH, you have celiac disease.  Only people with celiac disease get DH.  So it might be better to go for a DH diagnosis since that testing is less invasive than the endoscopy / gastrocopy.   The gluten challenge for DH is 12 weeks of eating a small amount of gluten.  But the test is to take a small skin biopsy from next to a lesion, vs an endosocpy / gastroscopy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.