Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Need Your Opinions Please...


JessicaB

Recommended Posts

JessicaB Explorer

ok. I would like to know everyones point of view on my stance. I had the blood test for celiac done on 11/15/2005. Here were the levels, IGA 1 (should be 0-4) igg 74 (should be 0-9)ttg iga 0, ttg igg 2 (should be 0-5), endomysial antibody iga 68l (should be 70-400). The doctor said usually two of the first numbers should be high for celiac but since my antibodies were low, thats why only one was high, DOES THAT MAKE SENCE???

Well.....He said the 74 is very high, most likely is has to be celiac. I recieved my biopsy results today THEY ARE NEGATIVE......!! Why???? If im in so much pain when i eat gluten why is there no damage? This has been going on since i had my daughter in july 2004??

Im going to see a specialist at the University of Maryland, Center for Celiac Research, anyone heard of that??

DOES ANYONE KNOW ABOUT THESE LEVELS???? PLEASE LET ME KNOW ASAP I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW YOUR POINT OF VIEWS. DO I HAVE CELIAC?? WHY IS THE BIOPSY NEGATIVE, I KNOW THE SPECIALIST WILL TELL ME BUT I NEED YOUR POINT OF VIEW, OF COARSE, EVERYONE HERE HAS THE EXPERIENCE AND KNOWLEDGE, THANKS A BUNCH!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest nini

The biopsy is not perfect... It can miss damage if not enough samples are taken or if samples are taken from an area that doesn't have damage yet.

Your blood tests do show Celiac... just because the biopsy doesn't show damage YET, doesn't mean it's not headed that way. There is still so much that the medical community does not know when it comes to Celiac, and many are coming to learn that the biopsy is NOT the gold standard it once was thought to be. There are many many Celiacs who have had negative biopsies despite positive blood test results, continued to eat gluten, got sicker and then years down the road DID HAVE a positive biopsy.

The biopsy in my opinion is only valid for confirming VAST amounts of damage. For sporatic or early damage, the diagnostic ability of a biopsy is sadly limited.

Since your blood work was elevated, YES you do have Celiac, go on the diet IMMEDIATELY (since you have already had the biopsy) and keep track of any and all improvements. IMHO dietary response is the BEST indicator. Give it a good 6 months to a year before you make any judgements and make sure you are 100% gluten free.

My blood tests were enough to dx Celiac in me, I never did have the biopsy. Not going to either. The way my body responded to the Gluten Free diet was no less than miraculous.

My Dr. dx me based on blood test results and positive dietary response.

VydorScope Proficient

Okay, we have a very high entrance of new posters here so I hope I do not sound like a broken record when I answer these posts...

Biopsy is never ever negative. It can not in anytime, or way be negative. THat is REGUARDLESS of the skill of the doctor/lab. The proper lable for your results is "non-postive". This is a MASSIVE difference. I have a long post here some place with the details of that is so that I can dig up.

Since your blood work was elevated, YES you do have Celiac, go on the diet IMMEDIATELY (since you have already had the biopsy) and keep track of any and all improvements. IMHO dietary response is the BEST indicator. Give it a good 6 months to a year before you make any judgements and make sure you are 100% gluten free.

Exactly! DO what nini says! Thats the best move you your situtation in my non-doctor opinion. :D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,669
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    CDR40
    Newest Member
    CDR40
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the community! Generally, for a gluten challenge before celiac disease blood tests, Tylenol (acetaminophen) is considered safe and should not interfere with your antibody results. The medications you typically need to avoid are those like ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) or naproxen (Aleve) that can cause intestinal irritation, which could potentially complicate the interpretation of an endoscopy if you were to have one. However, it is absolutely crucial that you confirm this with either your gastroenterologist or your surgeon before your procedure. They know the specifics of your case and can give you the definitive green light, ensuring your surgery is comfortable and your celiac testing remains accurate. Best of luck with your surgery tomorrow
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.