Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Those Of You Who Know About Blood Tests....


CMCM

Recommended Posts

CMCM Rising Star

Well, this is kind of interesting. I found an old blood test from 2001....at that time I had requested a celiac test from my GP, who really knew nothing about celiac disease. Anyhow, I just found the old results....at the time I didn't realize this paper was the celiac test because it doesn't say that, but with my new-found knowedge I realize that's what it was. Here goes:

Antigliadin AB, gliadin AB IGG: 3 where less than 20 is called "normal."

Gliadin AB IGA was 2.

DO THESE SOUND LIKE THE RIGHT TESTS?

How about 'them apples! Of course, the doctor said "Your test was negative."

So 5 more years of digestive hell for me!

Yet in January 2006 Enterolab rates me like this based on a stool sample:

Fecal Antigliadin IgA: 24 (normal is <10)

Fecal Antitissue Transglutaminase IgA 19 (normal is <10)

Microscopic Fecal Fat Score 67 (normal is <300)

HLA-DQ Gene DQB1 0201, 0604

Fecal Anti-casein IgA antibody 22 (normal <10).

Now I was having all sorts of problems back in 2001 when I requested the celiac blood panel. While I was eating gluten, I have always minimized what I ate. For whatever reason, not much showed up in my blood, yet I was having symptoms. Kind of strange. But my current fecal fat score was low, which indicates no malabsorption to speak of, so could that be why nothing showed up in my blood test???

I think the lesson in all this is that the blood test doesn't tell the whole story.

No wonder no one knows quite what to do with all this, and how to interpret things. After my "negative" blood test I was really looking to other possibilities to explain my digestive woes. But you know, my incredibly sensitive celiac mom would have a negative blood test now too. Maybe a lot of it has to do with how much gluten you eat. Although I ate gluten things, I have really minimized what I ate for many years. I didn't eat it every day.

I dunno....what do you more knowledgeable folks think about all this? :o


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest nini

those tests are only a partial celiac panel... doesn't look like the complete panel, they only did the Anti Gliadins and those are not even in teh bare minimum that they would have needed to do to determine if Celiac was a possibility.

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgA

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgG

Anti-Endomysial (EMA) IgA

Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA

Total Serum IgA

here is the complete panel... They would have to do at minimum the EMA, tTG and, total serum IgA to get a more accurate picture... plus the AGA's...

As the Celiac Specialist that spoke at our meeting said though, many people can have negative test results and still have damaged villi...

the blood tests are only part of the picture. Ultimately the dietary response is your best indicator. How does your body react to gluten? Doesn't like it? Then stay off it. Period. It's that simple.

CMCM Rising Star
those tests are only a partial celiac panel... doesn't look like the complete panel, they only did the Anti Gliadins and those are not even in teh bare minimum that they would have needed to do to determine if Celiac was a possibility.

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgA

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgG

Anti-Endomysial (EMA) IgA

Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA

Total Serum IgA

here is the complete panel... They would have to do at minimum the EMA, tTG and, total serum IgA to get a more accurate picture... plus the AGA's...

As the Celiac Specialist that spoke at our meeting said though, many people can have negative test results and still have damaged villi...

the blood tests are only part of the picture. Ultimately the dietary response is your best indicator. How does your body react to gluten? Doesn't like it? Then stay off it. Period. It's that simple.

This incomplete blood test just shows how utterly CLUELESS most doctors are. At the time I requested the test, I was having a lot of digestive and OTHER symptoms, and I told my doctor about wanting to get tested, and he was of course totally ignorant about what test to order. And he was also a bit reluctant to order the test because, after all, I didn't fit the classic profile. Anyhow, I would say to anyone who is thinking of getting testing, make sure all your ducks are in a row before you go to the expense of blood tests!

nikki-uk Enthusiast

My husband was finally dx at aged 40.

He too had a neg result on the bloods,but a biopsy showed positive.

He has alway's been very thin,and (for as long as I've known him-20yrs!)hardly ever ate any sizeable amount.

By the time of diagnosis he could only manage a few mouthfuls(he was very ill),so hardly suprising he got a negative!

CMCM Rising Star
My husband was finally dx at aged 40.

He too had a neg result on the bloods,but a biopsy showed positive.

He has alway's been very thin,and (for as long as I've known him-20yrs!)hardly ever ate any sizeable amount.

By the time of diagnosis he could only manage a few mouthfuls(he was very ill),so hardly suprising he got a negative!

Hi Nikki...I see you are in the UK. I thought doctors in Europe were better at diagnosing celiac than they are here. Am I wrong? Is it just as tough to get a real diagnoses there too???

aikiducky Apprentice

It varies hugely from country to country in Europe, and it also depends on who you happens to see, of course.

Pauliina

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      FDA looking for input on Celiac Gluten sensitivity labeling PLEASE READ and submit your suggestions

    2. - Scott Adams replied to lizzie42's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      Low iron and vitamin d

    3. - Scott Adams replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Healthy Gluten Free Foods low sugar that you found?

    4. - Scott Adams replied to lizzie42's topic in Traveling with Celiac Disease
      1

      Trip to Anaheim/Disney

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,242
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Maya Baum
    Newest Member
    Maya Baum
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Thank you for sharing this — it’s really important. The FDA is actively seeking public input on improving gluten and ingredient labeling, which could directly impact how people with celiac disease and gluten sensitivity shop and stay safe. Clearer labeling would help reduce accidental gluten exposure and make it easier to identify hidden sources of gluten in foods. I encourage everyone here who is affected by celiac or gluten sensitivity to read the announcement and submit their own suggestions — real lived experience matters and can influence policy changes that benefit the whole community.
    • Scott Adams
      A low tTG is great news, but it doesn’t always mean the small intestine has fully healed yet—iron and vitamin D absorption can lag behind for months or even years, especially in young children. Many kids need supplements for a period of time while the gut repairs itself, and that doesn’t necessarily mean it will be lifelong. Morning stomach pain is also commonly reported in celiac kids and can be related to slow healing, reflux, motility, or even low iron itself. It sounds like the supplements are clearly helping, which is reassuring, and ongoing monitoring with her doctor can help determine when (or if) doses can be reduced as absorption improves. The most common nutrient deficiencies associated with celiac disease that may lead to testing for the condition include iron, vitamin D, folate (vitamin B9), vitamin B12, calcium, zinc, and magnesium.  Unfortunately many doctors, including my own doctor at the time, don't do extensive follow up testing for a broad range of nutrient deficiencies, nor recommend that those just diagnosed with celiac disease take a broad spectrum vitamin/mineral supplement, which would greatly benefit most, if not all, newly diagnosed celiacs. This article has more info:    
    • Scott Adams
      A lot of gluten-free packaged foods do rely on extra sugar, starches, or sodium to replace texture and flavor, so focusing on simpler options makes sense. Many people do better with naturally gluten-free proteins like eggs, plain yogurt, nuts, seeds, hummus, beans, and minimally processed protein bars with lower added sugar and higher fiber. Pairing those with whole foods can help you feel more “normal” without triggering symptoms. Subscription boxes can be hit or miss, so checking labels carefully and using them as an occasional supplement—rather than a staple—often works best.
    • Scott Adams
      This article is a few of years old, but my still be helpful.  
    • knitty kitty
      Welcome to the forum, @McKinleyWY, For a genetic test, you don't have to eat gluten, but this will only show if you have the genes necessary for the development of Celiac disease.  It will not show if you have active Celiac disease.   Eating gluten stimulates the production of antibodies against gluten which mistakenly attack our own bodies.  The antibodies are produced in the small intestines.  Three grams of gluten are enough to make you feel sick and ramp up anti-gluten antibody production and inflammation for two years afterwards.  However, TEN grams of gluten or more per day for two weeks is required to stimulate anti-gluten antibodies' production enough so that the anti-gluten antibodies move out of the intestines and into the bloodstream where they can be measured in blood tests.  This level of anti-gluten antibodies also causes measurable damage to the lining of the intestines as seen on biopsy samples taken during an endoscopy (the "gold standard" of Celiac diagnosis).   Since you have been experimenting with whole wheat bread in the past year or so, possibly getting cross contaminated in a mixed household, and your immune system is still so sensitized to gluten consumption, you may want to go ahead with the gluten challenge.   It can take two years absolutely gluten free for the immune system to quit reacting to gluten exposure.   Avoiding gluten most if the time, but then experimenting with whole wheat bread is a great way to keep your body in a state of inflammation and illness.  A diagnosis would help you stop playing Russian roulette with your and your children's health.      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.