Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Positive biopsy, negative bloodwork


Anxiety4lyfe

Recommended Posts

Anxiety4lyfe Newbie

I received an endoscopy for GERD related symptoms and turns out my biopsies came back positive for celiac. My doctor ordered follow up bloodwork (I assumed a full panel) but it was just the genetic testing, not the ttg iga. My genetic testing came back negative. I decided to try gluten-free anyways and have had much fewer GI symptoms (previously was constant bloating and frequent diarrhea, now I have no bloating and have not had diarrhea at all). My doctor told me I DO NOT have celiac but I’m confused why my biopsy was positive, bloodwork negative meaning I don’t have it, and I feel better eating gluten-free… send help


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master
(edited)

Welcome to the forum Anxiety4lyfe!

It is not all that uncommon for the antibody bloodwork to be negative while the biopsy is positive. The biopsy is the diagnostic gold standard for celiac disease. So, I'm baffled that your doctor would declare that you do not have celiac disease. There are a few fairly rare non celiac explanations for blunted villi like long term NSAID therapy, some tropical parasitic infections and an intolerance of the dairy protein casein. But by far the most likely explanation is celiac disease. 

You say you are assuming the doc ran a full celiac panel. If I were you I would confirm that. Many or most docs will only order the tTG-IGA test.

Edited by trents
ravenwoodglass Mentor
5 hours ago, Anxiety4lyfe said:

I received an endoscopy for GERD related symptoms and turns out my biopsies came back positive for celiac. My doctor ordered follow up bloodwork (I assumed a full panel) but it was just the genetic testing, not the ttg iga. My genetic testing came back negative. I decided to try gluten-free anyways and have had much fewer GI symptoms (previously was constant bloating and frequent diarrhea, now I have no bloating and have not had diarrhea at all). My doctor told me I DO NOT have celiac but I’m confused why my biopsy was positive, bloodwork negative meaning I don’t have it, and I feel better eating gluten-free… send help

Your circumstance is why I wish doctors wouldn't use gene tests for diagnosis. Your doctor should have done a celiac panel first or with the gene tests. I am very thankful I was diagnosed before they started gene testing as if they had tested mine I would have heard the same as you did. I would have died years ago instead of being diagnosed correctly and having the chance to heal. There are more genes involved with celiac than just the two for which they typically test. Perhaps you have one of the odd ball genes like I do.  It sounds like you are recovering on the diet and at this point you have a choice to make. You can start eating gluten again for 6 weeks or so and then get a full celiac panel done or you can go with your bodies reaction to the diet (and the pain of the inevitable glutening) and just stay on the diet.

trents Grand Master
(edited)

^What Ravenwoodglass said.^

Years ago researchers identified two genes that are associated with celiac disease. Recently, they identified a possible third one. And who knows if there are still more than that? The human genome contains many interrelated parts and to assign one or two genes as responsible for this or that may be too reductionistic sometimes. And what used to be called "junk DNA" (supposedly non functional vestiges thought to be carried over from earlier stages of evolution) is now being debunked as research is showing it is indeed functional.

Edited by trents
Scott Adams Grand Master

I agree that on the genetic side, new research continues to find new genetic markers associated with celiac disease, for example this new article:

 

Jacky Bender Newbie

Hi I am new to this group. I went to see a dermatologist to have a couple of moles removed on my back. She noticed the awful rash on my arm and said it looked as if I was celiac. Took a biopsy which came back 'Dermatitis Herpetiformis'. I was told to give up gluten and have diagnosis confirmed with a blood test. That came back negative for celiac. I would like  have the blood test re-done as from m research it wasn't done properly I have been COMPLETELY avoiding gluten for over 2 month and don't want to go back on gluten inorder to redo the blood test. Help me !

trents Grand Master

Jacky Bender, welcome to the forum!

Currently, there are no tests to diagnose celiac disease that will give valid results if someone has already begun the gluten free lifestyle. 

Having said that, a positive diagnosis of DH is definite proof that you have celiac disease. There are no other medical conditions that cause DH besides celiac disease.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,342
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Setb1210
    Newest Member
    Setb1210
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      My reaction to a gluten bolus exposure is similar to yours, with 2-3 hours of severe abdominal cramps and intractable emesis followed by several hours of diarrhea. I don't necessarily equate that one large exposure to gluten with significant intestinal lining damage, however. I think it's just a violent reaction to a what the body perceives to be a somewhat toxic substance that I am no longer tolerant of because I have quit exposing myself to it regularly. It's just the body purging itself of it rather than an expression of significant damage. Before diagnosis, when I was consuming gluten daily, I had little to no GI distress. I was, for the most part, a "silent celiac". The damage to my small bowel lining didn't happen all at once but was slow and insidious, accumulating over a period of years. The last time I got a big shot of gluten was about three years ago when I got my wife's wheat biscuits mixed up with my gluten-free ones. There was this acute reaction after about two hours of ingestion as I described above. I felt washed out for a few days and fully recovered within a week or so.  Now, I'm a 74-year-old male. So, I'm not worried about being pregnant. And I don't want to contradict your physicians advice. But I just don't think you have done significant damage to your small bowel lining by one episode of significant gluten ingestion. I just don't think it works that way.
    • Skydawg
      Wondering about some thoughts on how long to wait to try to get pregnant after a gluten exposure?  I have been diagnosed for 10 years and have followed the diet strictly. I have been cross contaminated before, but have never had a full on gluten exposure. I went to a restaurant recently, and the waiter messed up and gave me regular bread and told me it was gluten free. 2 hours later I was throwing up for the whole evening. I have never had that kind of reaction before as I have never had such a big exposure. My husband and I were planning to start trying to get pregnant this month. My dr did blood work to check for electrolytes and white blood cells, but did not do a full nutritional panel. Most of my GI symptoms have resolved in the past 2 weeks, but I am definitely still dealing with brain fog, fatigue and headaches. My dr has recommended I wait 3 months before I start to try to get pregnant.   I have read else where about how long it can take for the intestine to fully heal, and the impacts gluten exposure can have on pregnancy. I guess I am really wondering if anyone has had a similar experience? How long does it take to heal after 1 exposure like that, after following the diet so well for 10 years? Is 3 months an okay amount of time to wait? Is there anything I can do in the meantime to reduce my symptoms? 
    • ShadowLoom
      I’ve used tinctures and made my own edibles with gluten-free ingredients to stay safe. Dispensary staff don’t always know about gluten, so I double-check labels or just make my own.
    • Scott Adams
      It's great to hear that there are some good doctors out there, and this is an example of why having a formal diagnosis can definitely be helpful.
    • RMJ
      Update: I have a wonderful new gastroenterologist. She wants to be sure there’s nothing more serious, like refractory celiac, going on. She ordered various tests including some micronutrient tests that no one has ever ordered before.  I’m deficient in folate and zinc and starting supplements for both. I’m so glad I decided to go to a new GI!
×
×
  • Create New...