Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Positive biopsy, negative bloodwork


Anxiety4lyfe

Recommended Posts

Anxiety4lyfe Newbie

I received an endoscopy for GERD related symptoms and turns out my biopsies came back positive for celiac. My doctor ordered follow up bloodwork (I assumed a full panel) but it was just the genetic testing, not the ttg iga. My genetic testing came back negative. I decided to try gluten-free anyways and have had much fewer GI symptoms (previously was constant bloating and frequent diarrhea, now I have no bloating and have not had diarrhea at all). My doctor told me I DO NOT have celiac but I’m confused why my biopsy was positive, bloodwork negative meaning I don’t have it, and I feel better eating gluten-free… send help


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master
(edited)

Welcome to the forum Anxiety4lyfe!

It is not all that uncommon for the antibody bloodwork to be negative while the biopsy is positive. The biopsy is the diagnostic gold standard for celiac disease. So, I'm baffled that your doctor would declare that you do not have celiac disease. There are a few fairly rare non celiac explanations for blunted villi like long term NSAID therapy, some tropical parasitic infections and an intolerance of the dairy protein casein. But by far the most likely explanation is celiac disease. 

You say you are assuming the doc ran a full celiac panel. If I were you I would confirm that. Many or most docs will only order the tTG-IGA test.

Edited by trents
ravenwoodglass Mentor
5 hours ago, Anxiety4lyfe said:

I received an endoscopy for GERD related symptoms and turns out my biopsies came back positive for celiac. My doctor ordered follow up bloodwork (I assumed a full panel) but it was just the genetic testing, not the ttg iga. My genetic testing came back negative. I decided to try gluten-free anyways and have had much fewer GI symptoms (previously was constant bloating and frequent diarrhea, now I have no bloating and have not had diarrhea at all). My doctor told me I DO NOT have celiac but I’m confused why my biopsy was positive, bloodwork negative meaning I don’t have it, and I feel better eating gluten-free… send help

Your circumstance is why I wish doctors wouldn't use gene tests for diagnosis. Your doctor should have done a celiac panel first or with the gene tests. I am very thankful I was diagnosed before they started gene testing as if they had tested mine I would have heard the same as you did. I would have died years ago instead of being diagnosed correctly and having the chance to heal. There are more genes involved with celiac than just the two for which they typically test. Perhaps you have one of the odd ball genes like I do.  It sounds like you are recovering on the diet and at this point you have a choice to make. You can start eating gluten again for 6 weeks or so and then get a full celiac panel done or you can go with your bodies reaction to the diet (and the pain of the inevitable glutening) and just stay on the diet.

trents Grand Master
(edited)

^What Ravenwoodglass said.^

Years ago researchers identified two genes that are associated with celiac disease. Recently, they identified a possible third one. And who knows if there are still more than that? The human genome contains many interrelated parts and to assign one or two genes as responsible for this or that may be too reductionistic sometimes. And what used to be called "junk DNA" (supposedly non functional vestiges thought to be carried over from earlier stages of evolution) is now being debunked as research is showing it is indeed functional.

Edited by trents
Scott Adams Grand Master

I agree that on the genetic side, new research continues to find new genetic markers associated with celiac disease, for example this new article:

 

Jacky Bender Newbie

Hi I am new to this group. I went to see a dermatologist to have a couple of moles removed on my back. She noticed the awful rash on my arm and said it looked as if I was celiac. Took a biopsy which came back 'Dermatitis Herpetiformis'. I was told to give up gluten and have diagnosis confirmed with a blood test. That came back negative for celiac. I would like  have the blood test re-done as from m research it wasn't done properly I have been COMPLETELY avoiding gluten for over 2 month and don't want to go back on gluten inorder to redo the blood test. Help me !

trents Grand Master

Jacky Bender, welcome to the forum!

Currently, there are no tests to diagnose celiac disease that will give valid results if someone has already begun the gluten free lifestyle. 

Having said that, a positive diagnosis of DH is definite proof that you have celiac disease. There are no other medical conditions that cause DH besides celiac disease.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,599
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jose Mojena
    Newest Member
    Jose Mojena
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Alibu
      I was tested back in 2017 and my TTG-IGA was mildly elevated (an 11 with reference range <4) but my EMA was negative and biopsy was negative. Fast forward to 2 weeks ago where I was like y'know what, I still have so many symptoms and I'm always so sick, I should repeat this, thinking it was not going to be positive.  I also found out through 23 and me that I do have the HLA-DQ2.5 gene so I thought it would be good to repeat given my ongoing symptoms. Well my blood work came back with a ttg-iga level of 152.6 with a reference range of <15 and my EMA was positive and EMA titer was 1:10 with reference range of <1:5. I guess I'm nervous that I'm going to do the biopsy and it's going to be negative again, especially since I also had an endoscopy in 2020, not to look for celiac but just as a regular 5 year thing I do because of all my GI issues, and they didn't see anything then either. I have no idea how long the EMA has been positive but I'm wondering if it's very recent, if the biopsy will show damage and if so, if they'll say well the biopsy is the gold standard so it's not celiac? I of course am doing all the things to convince myself that it isn't real. Do a lot of people go through this? I think because back in 2017 my ttg-iga was elevated but not a huge amount and my EMA was negative and my biopsy was negative, I keep thinking this time it's going to be different. But this time my ttg-iga is 152.6 with reference range <15, and my EMA was positive. BUT, my titer is only 1:10 and I keep reading how most people here had a ttg-iga in the hundreds or thousands, and the EMA titer was much higher. So now I am convinced that it was a false positive and when they do the biopsy it'll be negative.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @linnylou73! Are you claiming this based on a reaction or based upon actual testing?
    • linnylou73
      Sams club membermark columbian coffee is either cross contaminated or the pods contain gluten
    • KimMS
    • Scott Adams
      This varies a lot from person to person. I include foods that are not certified gluten-free but are labelled "gluten-free", while super sensitive people only use certified gluten-free. Both types of products have been found to contain gluten, so there are no guarantees either way: It you are in the super sensitive group, eating a whole foods based diet where you prepare everything is the safest bet, but it's also difficult. Eating out is the the most risky, even if a restaurant has a gluten-free menu. I also include items that are naturally gluten-free, for example refried beans, tuna, pasta sauces, salsas, etc., which have a low overall risk of contamination.
×
×
  • Create New...