Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

High Positive Bloods, Normal Biopsies 2year old


Sasha Wearmouth

Recommended Posts

Sasha Wearmouth Newbie

Hello. Needing help. 2 year old had high positive blood results for Ceoliac. Biopsies normal. Specialist said he would redo bloods to see if highs wasnt just an unknown infection at the time.But if remained high he wouldn't do anything about it for at least a year. Her bloods are higher than original. Im Ceoliac. Her Gene testing hasnt arrived back yet.... Im wanting a definite diagnosis.....shall i go for another opinion . Shes grumpy, clingy, yuck poos amd just not that happy with life

 

anti TTG IgA:135.4 CU ( 0.0 - 20.0 ) HH

TTG IgA Interpretation:Positive A

IgA:0.5 g/L ( 0.1 - 1.1 )

Endomysial Ab:Positive A

Deamidated Gliadin Peptide IgG:35.5 CU ( 0.0 - 20.0 ) HH

DGP IgG Interpretation: Weak Positive A

 

Please help


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cristiana Veteran

Hello Sasha and welcome to the forum,

What a frustrating situation for you both.

It is strange the biopsies were negative, but one thing I believe that can happen is that damage can be patchy, and therefore it is possible that it was missed.  Do you know how many samples were taken, and from how many different areas - this info sometimes finds its way into the consultant's report?  

Cristiana

 

trents Grand Master
(edited)

Cristiana gives good advice. But you may be surprised to know it is not all that uncommon to have positive antibody tests and with a negative biopsy and still have celiac disease. We have had forum participants report that combination a number of time since I have been participating on this forum and most of the time it is with young children. Celiac children just seem to often throw unusual test results. Their immune systems are immature and their body is so resilient. Sometimes we also see the opposite (even in adults) with positive biopsy and negative antibodies. Your child's antibody tests are strongly positive except for the one and it is weakly positive. That strongly suggests celiac disease to me. And there are all those classic symptoms.

I  think you need to trial a gluten free diet for you child. But realize when you begin that it will start to drive antibody scores down and invalidate further testing. So, you need to weigh the merits of starting gluten-free now to relieve the child's distress vs. waiting until all testing is done.

Edited by trents
cristiana Veteran

Trent's is also good advice.🙂   

One thing to add - I am not sure where you are posting from, but in some countries there are real benefits in obtaining a formal diagnosis.  In my country, a coeliac diagnosis = an annual follow-up from a gastroenterologist, a nutritionist referral, and as one ages (I am not sure if it applies to children) a DEXA bone scan every few years to check for osteopenia.  I read once that in Italy - not sure - extra money may be given by the government to cover the extra cost of gluten free bread and pasta. 

So that might help you decide on whether you want to try to secure this formal diagnosis by further testing.

trents Grand Master

Also, the endomysial antibody test is very specific for celiac disease. It is the most specific test available but the least sensitive. To me, that says a lot when it is positive. Kudos to your physician for running a full celiac panel instead of just the tTG-IGA. 

Sasha Wearmouth Newbie
3 hours ago, cristiana said:

Hello Sasha and welcome to the forum,

What a frustrating situation for you both.

It is strange the biopsies were negative, but one thing I believe that can happen is that damage can be patchy, and therefore it is possible that it was missed.  Do you know how many samples were taken, and from how many different areas - this info sometimes finds its way into the consultant's report?  

Cristiana

 

They told me 9 from 3 different spots.

Sasha Wearmouth Newbie
34 minutes ago, cristiana said:

Trent's is also good advice.🙂   

One thing to add - I am not sure where you are posting from, but in some countries there are real benefits in obtaining a formal diagnosis.  In my country, a coeliac diagnosis = an annual follow-up from a gastroenterologist, a nutritionist referral, and as one ages (I am not sure if it applies to children) a DEXA bone scan every few years to check for osteopenia.  I read once that in Italy - not sure - extra money may be given by the government to cover the extra cost of gluten free bread and pasta. 

So that might help you decide on whether you want to try to secure this formal diagnosis by further testing.

Thank u .. we are New Zealand 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,282
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    William Errens
    Newest Member
    William Errens
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • numike
      69yo M I have had skin cancer basal  I use a higher quality Vit D https://www.amazon.com/Biotech-D3-5-5000iu-Capsules-Count/dp/B00NGMJRTE
    • Wheatwacked
      Your high lactulose test, indicating out of control Small Itenstinal Bacterial O,vergrowth is one symptom.  You likely have low vitamin D, another symptom.  Unless you get lots of sun.   Celiac Disease is a disease of malabsorption, often leading to subclinical vitamin deficiencies.  A lot of people have these symptoms just before an acute phase of Celiac Disease.  Each of the symptoms can have multiple causes that are not celiac disease,  but when you start having multiple symptoms,  and each symptom is treated as a separate disease,  you have to think, maybe these are all one cause. celiac disease. There is a misconception that Celiac Disease is  a gastrointestinal disease and symptoms are only gastro related.  Wrong.  It is an autoimmune disease and has many symptoms that usually are disregarded.  I made that mistake until 63 y.o.  It can cause a dermatitis herpetiformis rash,  white spots on the brain.  It caused my alcoholism, arthritis, congested sineses, protein spots on my contacts lenses, swollen prostate, symptoms that are "part of aging". You may be tolerating gluten, the damage will happen. Of curiosity though, your age, sex, are you outside a lot without sunscreen?  
    • trents
      It would be interesting to see if you were tested again for blood antibodies after abandoning the gluten free diet for several weeks to a few months what the results would be. Don't misunderstand me. I'm not necessarily suggesting you do this but it is an option to think about. I guess I'm saying there is a question in my mind as to whether you actually ever had celiac disease. As I said above, the blood antibody testing can yield false positives. And it is also true that celiac-like symptoms can be produced by other medical conditions.
    • numike
      Thank you for the reply In the early 2000's I did not have the endoscopy nor the biopsy I do not have those initial records I have only consulted a GI drs in the USA 
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @numike! We sometimes get reports like yours from community members who believe their celiac disease has "gone away." We think there can sometimes be cases of remission but not long term healing and that continued consumption of gluten will eventually result in a relapse. This is the state of our knowledge at this point but there is still a lot we don't know and celiac disease continues to surprise us with new findings on a frequent basis. So, we would not advise you to abandon a strict gluten-free diet. Perhaps you can draw consolation from the fact that at the present time you seem to be able to consume gluten without consequences when in situations where you do not have the option to eat gluten-free. But I would advise you to not generalize your recent experience such that you throw caution to the wind. But I want to go back to what you said about being diagnosed by blood test in the early 2000's. Did you not also have that confirmed with an endoscopy and biopsy of the small bowel lining? Normally, a celiac disease diagnosis is not concluded based on a blood test alone because there can be false positives. What kind of doctor did this testing? Was it done in the U.S. or overseas? In the last few years, it has become common in the U.K. to grant a celiac diagnosis from blood testing alone if the antibody test scores are 10x normal or greater. But that practice has not caught on in the U.S. yet and was not in place internationally in the early 2000's. Do you have a record of the tests that were done, the scores and also the reference ranges for negative vs. positive for the tests?
×
×
  • Create New...