Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Stool test, do I need to look further?


marko19

Recommended Posts

marko19 Newbie

5 years ago I ended up in the hospital with severe stomach issues and organ issues. After that, I struggled with my stomach, mostly bloating and bowel obstruction. Which might occur once every month and a few fiber pills would fix this within a day.
Now the last 3 months, the problems have become more frequent than normal. So I decided to start with a stool test for my microbiome. 
Keep in mind all these 5 years I have been consuming gluten products without a problem(that's what I think). The test results came in kinda vague, and my next appointment is only in 2 weeks. The test concluded: This may indicate gluten intolerance or possibly also gluten enteropathy (synonyms: celiac disease).

Test results: 
Anti-gliadin antibodies in feces >200,00 U/l (light red on diagram)

Anti-transglutaminase antibodies in feces <50,00 U/I (green on diagram)

My overall gut health isn't the best right now considering the other subjects tested. It also showed I might have lactose-intolerance for example

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Wheatwacked Veteran

Welcome to the forum marko19.

"Sensitivity of faecal antibodies against human tissue transglutaminase was 10%, and specificity was 98% . For antibodies against gliadin, sensitivity was 6% (0% to 29%) and specificity was 97%."  Detection of secretory IgA antibodies against gliadin and human tissue transglutaminase in stool to screen for coeliac disease in children: validation study

Not a very accurate test, if you are looking for a lab based diagnosis.

If you are looking for an excuse to do a trial gluten free diet, why not? This test gives you a maybe yes, maybe no.

But you already know that from your symptoms.

If you need a positive test to prompt you, the biopsy is still the Gold Standard for a positive diagnosis, but many people have negative test, and are declare Not Celiac, only to suffer years more until one day the test is Positive.  So positive biopsy is a definate diagnosis, negative biopsy means either you are not Celiac or they didn't find it this time.  Even with negative biopsy and blood tests, there are no diagnostic tests for Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity other than to rule out Celiac but respond well to Gluten Free Diet.

If you can this would be the time to get a full Celiac test panel and or biopsy done, before you start GFD.  Once you are gluten free you will test negative.  After being gluten-free many people with Celiac are even more sensitive to gluten, so it would be a defacto diagnosis in my mind.  Are Celiac and NCGS simply different variations of the same disease?  No one knows.  Does it matter?  Not really.  The only treatment in all cases of GS is avoidance of gluten and correcting the malnutrition they cause by malabsorption and food avoidance.

Close to one half the world population have one or more genes for Celiac, yet only 1 to 3 percent have a positive Celiac Disease diagnosis.  10% are diagnosed as NCGs.

If you have a rash, it may be Dermetitis Hepetiforumus which is only caused by Celiac Disease and a properly done biopsy, adjacent to the rash is a positive diagnosis.

How many more symptoms on this list do you have?

 

Wheatwacked Veteran
1 hour ago, marko19 said:

I struggled with my stomach, mostly bloating and bowel obstruction.

Many with these symptoms are deficient in vitamin D, Thiamine (subclinical Beriberi) and Choline deficient (gallbladder disease symptoms).

marko19 Newbie
4 minutes ago, Wheatwacked said:

Welcome to the forum marko19.

"Sensitivity of faecal antibodies against human tissue transglutaminase was 10%, and specificity was 98% . For antibodies against gliadin, sensitivity was 6% (0% to 29%) and specificity was 97%."  Detection of secretory IgA antibodies against gliadin and human tissue transglutaminase in stool to screen for coeliac disease in children: validation study

Not a very accurate test, if you are looking for a lab based diagnosis.

If you are looking for an excuse to do a trial gluten free diet, why not? This test gives you a maybe yes, maybe no.

But you already know that from your symptoms.

If you need a positive test to prompt you, the biopsy is still the Gold Standard for a positive diagnosis, but many people have negative test, and are declare Not Celiac, only to suffer years more until one day the test is Positive.  So positive biopsy is a definate diagnosis, negative biopsy means either you are not Celiac or they didn't find it this time.  Even with negative biopsy and blood tests, there are no diagnostic tests for Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity other than to rule out Celiac but respond well to Gluten Free Diet.

If you can this would be the time to get a full Celiac test panel and or biopsy done, before you start GFD.  Once you are gluten free you will test negative.  After being gluten-free many people with Celiac are even more sensitive to gluten, so it would be a defacto diagnosis in my mind.  Are Celiac and NCGS simply different variations of the same disease?  No one knows.  Does it matter?  Not really.  The only treatment in all cases of GS is avoidance of gluten and correcting the malnutrition they cause by malabsorption and food avoidance.

Close to one half the world population have one or more genes for Celiac, yet only 1 to 3 percent have a positive Celiac Disease diagnosis.  10% are diagnosed as NCGs.

If you have a rash, it may be Dermetitis Hepetiforumus which is only caused by Celiac Disease and a properly done biopsy, adjacent to the rash is a positive diagnosis.

How many more symptoms on this list do you have?

 

Thank you for the information.

From the symptom list I only have
- Abdominal cramps, gas and bloating
- Sometimes diarrhea, but only around the time I am bloating
- The test also showed lactose intolerance 

trents Grand Master

If you really want to explore the possibility of celiac disease you need to have serum antibody testing, including "total serum IGA" in case your total IGA is low since this could skew the individual IGA tests down toward the negative range. The total serum IGA test is not in and of itself a celiac antibody test.

If the serum antibody tests are positive then you would likely be referred to a GI specialist for an endoscopy with biopsy to check for damage to the small bowel villous lining, the hallmark of celiac disease. If the antibody tests are negative then you many have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) for which there are no tests. Celiac disease must first be ruled out. But it's important to remember that if you start a gluten free diet ahead of either of these testing modes you will invalidate the test resutls.

Wheatwacked Veteran

Lactose intolerance is mostly a gut biome issue.  The lactobacillus that we host returns the favor by producing lactase.  Most mammals only produce enough lactase endogenously to support the infant.  Since they started making quick pickles instead of fermenting them in salt the world has experienced an increase in Lactose Intolerance complaints.

Fermented foods like Dill Pickles are a good source of lactobacillus.  Pickled foods with vinegar are not fermented so they have the taste but not the nutrition.  Another case of profit over nutrition.

marko19 Newbie

I have kept eating gluten for the last few days, and have felt perfectly fine doing so.
Can it be a one-time thing that my anti-gliadin antibodies in my stool were with increased levels?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Wheatwacked Veteran
(edited)
On 8/11/2023 at 1:26 PM, marko19 said:

5 years ago I ended up in the hospital with severe stomach issues and organ issues.

They'll be back.

Quote

Physical examination of the patient showed nothing remarkable, except for notable thinness. The patient showed no gastrointestinal symptoms, and had no family history of gastroenterological diseases.   
Diagnostic tests, including blood tests and duodenal biopsy, confirmed the diagnosis of celiac disease with grade 4 Marsh 3C classification, even though the patient lacked typical gastrointestinal symptoms.  Celiac Disease Masquerades

 

Edited by Wheatwacked

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,258
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    mbarnesrrt
    Newest Member
    mbarnesrrt
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      We have a category of articles on this topic if you really want to dive into it: https://www.celiac.com/celiac-disease/miscellaneous-information-on-celiac-disease/gluten-free-diet-celiac-disease-amp-codex-alimentarius-wheat-starch/
    • Scott Adams
      I agree with @trents, and the rash you described, especially its location and resistance to steroids, sounds highly characteristic of dermatitis herpetiformis, which is the skin manifestation of celiac disease. The severe and prolonged reaction you're describing five days after a small exposure is, while extreme, not unheard of for those with a high sensitivity; the systemic inflammatory response can absolutely last for several days or even weeks, explaining why you still don't feel right. Your plan to avoid a formal gluten challenge is completely understandable given the severity of your reactions, and many choose the same path for their well-being. While experiences with GliadinX (they are a sponsor here) are mixed, some people do report a reduction in the severity of their symptoms when taken with accidental gluten, though it is crucial to remember it is not a cure or a license to eat gluten and its effectiveness can vary from person to person. For now, the absolute best advice is to continue being hyper-vigilant about cross-contamination—buffets are notoriously high-risk, even with good intentions. Connecting with a gastroenterologist and a dermatologist who specialize in celiac disease is essential for navigating diagnosis and management moving forward. Wishing you a swift recovery from this last exposure. If you have DH you will likely also want to avoid iodine, which is common in seafoods and dairy products, as it can exacerbate symptoms in some people. This article may also be helpful as it offers various ways to relieve the itch:  
    • Scott Adams
      So just to be cautious, there is a big difference between cured, and responding to their medication. I assume you mean that your daughter responded well while taking KAN-101 during the trial, but the drug would not cure celiac disease, but may manage it while you are taking it. Let me know if I got this right.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Godfather! "Gluten-free" is not the same as zero gluten. The FDA standard for allowing the food industry to us the gluten-free label on a product is that it cannot exceed 20 ppm of gluten. That is safe for most celiacs but not for the subset of celiacs/gltuen sensitive people who are super sensitive. "Gluten-free" wheat starch products have been processed in such a way to remove enough of the protein gluten to comply with the FDA regulation but usually do retain some gluten and we usually get reports from some people on this forum who fall in the more sensitive range that such products cause them to react. Hope this helps. So, you may just have to experiment for yourself.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Dana0207! Another diagnostic approach would be to get biopsied for dermatitis herpetiformis which would not require an extensive exposure to gluten. But it would need to be done during an active outbreak of the rash. Celiac disease is the only known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it would be a definitive diagnosis. It might be tricky, however, to time the dermatology appointment with the gluten exposure and outbreak.
×
×
  • Create New...