Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Son’s celiac labs


gladwella
Go to solution Solved by Scott Adams,

Recommended Posts

gladwella Newbie

Some of my son’s labs came back and I’m trying to understand what they may mean. 
tTG-IgA = negative 

DMG-IgA = positive 

DMG-IgG = negative 

EMA = still waiting on these

I understand this group cannot diagnose, but am just trying to get a handle on what may be going on. If two of the three returned are negative does this mean it’s not celiac and more of a gluten sensitivity or if any of the results returned are positive does that mean further work up/biopsy is warranted?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



gladwella Newbie
3 minutes ago, gladwella said:

Some of my son’s labs came back and I’m trying to understand what they may mean. 
tTG-IgA = negative (0.5) range: 0.0-14.9

DMG-IgA = positive (26.3) range: 0.0-14.9

DMG-IgG = negative (0.4) range 0.0-14.9

EMA = still waiting on these

I understand this group cannot diagnose, but am just trying to get a handle on what may be going on. If two of the three returned are negative does this mean it’s not celiac and more of a gluten sensitivity or if any of the results returned are positive does that mean further work up/biopsy is warranted?

 

trents Grand Master

Did you mistype? We are used to seeing DGP-IGA and DGP-IGG instead of "DMG-".

The two most targeted tests you had run for celiac disease are the tTG-IGA and the EMA. The other two are not as specific for celiac disease. The tTG-IGA is the most popular blood antibody test run by physicians for celiac disease. It combines good sensitivity with good specificity. The EMA is is an older test but quite specific. It is expensive to run and has given way to the tTG-IGA which accomplishes much the same thing and is less expensive. The positive DMG-IgA could possible indicate celiac disease but is less specific so positives can be caused by other things and is sometimes very helpful, especially when total IgA count is low or if someone has already been cutting back on gluten before testing.

Some questions:

1. How old is your son? Children's immune systems are immature and sometimes don't respond typically to celiac antibody testing the same way as do adults. Some of the secondary antibody tests such as the DGP-IGG and DGP-IGA can be helpful in spotting celiac disease in these cases.

2. Before the celiac blood antibody tests were run, had he been limiting his consumption of gluten to avoid unpleasant symptoms? If so, this can sabotage the testing and cause false negatives.

gladwella Newbie

Thank you for responding! Yes, I did mistype, apologies for that, this is all still very new. The Deamidated Gliadine IgA was positive while the IgG was negative. 

1. He is 9 with a long history of GI issues and abdominal pain 

2. We hadn’t restricted gluten yet but don’t have a gluten heavy diet in general. He has been food restricting for about a month (we attributed it to stress), so that could likely throw off the results some. I hadn’t considered that.

 

1 minute ago, trents said:

Did you mistype? We are used to seeing DGP-IGA and DGP-IGG instead of "DMG-".

The two most targeted tests you had run for celiac disease are the tTG-IGA and the EMA. The other two are not as specific for celiac disease. The tTG-IGA is the most popular blood antibody test run by physicians for celiac disease. It combines good sensitivity with good specificity. The EMA is is an older test but quite specific. It is expensive to run and has given way to the tTG-IGA which accomplishes much the same thing and is less expensive. The positive DMG-IgA could possible indicate celiac disease but is less specific so positives can be caused by other things and is sometimes very helpful, especially when total IgA count is low or if someone has already been cutting back on gluten before testing.

Some questions:

1. How old is your son? Children's immune systems are immature and sometimes don't respond typically to celiac antibody testing the same way as do adults. Some of the secondary antibody tests such as the DGP-IGG and DGP-IGA can be helpful in spotting celiac disease in these cases.

2. Before the celiac blood antibody tests were run, had he been limiting his consumption of gluten to avoid unpleasant symptoms? If so, this can sabotage the testing and cause false negatives.

 

trents Grand Master

It is also possible your son has NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease but does not damage the villous lining of  the small bowel as does celiac disease. NCGS is 10x more common than celiac disease but there is no definitive test for it at the present time. Celiac disease must first be ruled out. The antidote is the same, however, and that is complete abstinence from gluten for life. Some experts feel that NCGS can be a precursor to celiac disease. When you are satisfied that all testing for celiac disease is done, it would seem the next logical step would be to put your son on a strict gluten free diet and see if his symptoms improve.

  • Solution
Scott Adams Grand Master

This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.

 

 

gladwella Newbie

Trents & Scott, thank you so much for the information! This has given me some excellent resources and information to consider!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,791
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PamelaMayot
    Newest Member
    PamelaMayot
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • thejayland10
      That is a very good point I do not know if they truly ever went down. With my nutrient levels all being good, CBC, metabolic panel I assumed everything was fine over the years. Now Im worried this is refractory celiac or something else 
    • RMJ
      I don’t know how common it is, but it happens.  Total IgA going up is not necessarily celiac related.  The body can make IgA antibodies against all sort of things.   But if I understand correctly that until recently you haven’t had a celiac blood test since diagnosis, how do you know that your recent blood tests are a mild rise, vs never going down to the normal range? That also can happen, although not too common. Some people with celiac disease do react even to purity protocol certified gluten free oats. Removing oats from your diet for a few months and retesting is probably a good idea.
    • thejayland10
      interesting I did not know that was that common or could take that long.  When I was diagnosed 15 yrs ago I was told just follow gluten-free diet and follow up with primary care doctor (who never checked celiac panel again). I felt way better and all the major symptoms went away. It wasn't until recently at 25 (14 yrs after diagnosis) that I thought to follow up with a gastro doctor who then did a celiac panel and noted those minor elevations 3 months ago then I got them checked again by another doctor the other week and were showing roughly the same thing.  I am very strict with what I eat and dieitican was maybe thinking it could be oat flour. I do eat a fair amount of processed food but I will not touch anything unless it is certified gluten free.  Do you see this pretty commonly with others? Having mild rises in TTG IGA and IGA who have been on gluten-free diet for years? 
    • RMJ
      Do you have any other results from either of the two labs where you’ve been tested recently?  If so, are the newest results from that lab elevated over previous results? It took me 5 years to get all of my antibodies into the normal range. Then 3 years later one went up into the positive range.  I realized that I had started baking with a different brand of gluten free flour.  When I stopped using that flour the level went back to normal.  Has something changed in your diet, environment, activities, medications or other areas where you could possibly be exposed to gluten? 
    • thejayland10
      Thank you for the clarifcation, how can I get to the bottom of this as to why they may be elevated even on a super strict gluten-free diet? 
×
×
  • Create New...