Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy


ogrestrength

Recommended Posts

ogrestrength Newbie

My father has had problems for ten or more years but refuses to get tested. To this date, he has never changed his diet. My older sister was diagnosed with celiac sprue post pregnancy about 6 years ago with blood test and biopsy, she "cheats" frequently and contacts wheat all the time. I developed symptoms about 2 years ago and initially took care of the discomfort with prevacid. Later, I tested positive with the blood test but fought the doctors when they tried to do the upper G.I. I left without one being done. I have a lot of pain when I eat products containing wheat. Sometimes within 5 minutes, sometimes within 5 hours. However, it isn't a sure thing. I don't have problems touching breads or crackers ect.. either. I read these boards and second guess my "diagnosis". I frequently eat small amounts of wheat products such as corn or rice chex cereal or a single wheat thin cracker. So I ask, should I get tested with a biopsy or are there different "levels" of intolerance? Are the increased adverse reactions due to length of time g.f.?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



CarlaB Enthusiast

The longer I've been gluten-free, the more sensitive I seem to it.

If I had it to do over, I would not have tortured myself and my family with the gluten challenge required for the biopsy. It ended up being negative anyway. It probably wasn't long enough, and the wheat was making me so sick, I ate small amounts of it and skipped some days entirely. I ended up getting tested by Enterolab just to be sure I wasn't imagining it all.

You just need to decide whether you need the biopsy to prove it to yourself. If you feel better gluten-free, and have tested positive with the blood test, I'd say you definately have a problem. Would it make a difference to you if the test was negative? It didn't for me; I still knew gluten was making me ill (my blood test was negative, too, but had not taken a gluten challenge prior to it). Since I went to all that trouble and expense, I kind of wish the biopsy had been positive, in some sort of strange kind of way. I understand you thinking you need it for your own peace of mind, I felt the same way.

Carolann1217 Newbie

Hello, I am a new member and have so many questions I really don't know where to start. For one thing, I have had many of the symptoms of Celiac for many years. It goes back to pregnancy 14 years ago. I had major platelet problems during pregnancy and child birth....then within a year was diagnosed lactose intolerant. From there, I can't remember ever really feeling good again. I just thought it was due to the change in my body but I developed all kinds of stomach pains, seemed like no matter what I ate never really sat right. In addition I developed all kinds of allergies and Asthma! Anyway.... fast forward about 11 years or so and I decided to try the Atkins diet to drop 10 pounds before a vacation. Well... I felt GREAT! I couldn't believe it. I haven't felt so good in years. I continued with the low carb diet for the next 2 years, "cheating" on weekends but being very good during the week. I never felt great when I would cheat....but in my head thought it was worth it and it was probably just due to my body not being used to the carbs anymore. Anyway... to try to make a long story short... even cheating only on weekends was still making me wonder about other symptoms. I have ITP an autoimmune disease of low platelets, in addition I am 36 and have very low bone density, I also have MANY of the stomach symptoms listed on all the sites for Celiac. So... not only all that, but my mother has ALL THE SAME THINGS. Not so much the gut issues, but the low bone density and the ITP, which is very unusual. So, we decided to have the blood work done. Her's came out positive, but mine was negative. I believe it was mainly due to my low carb diet for the past 2 years. I wasn't consuming a normal amount of gluten when I had the blood work done, I was still on the low carb diet and only had the occasional weekend cheat.... so, my doctor has recommended the biopsy. Due to the fact that my mother has tested positive through the blood test and I have so many symptoms. My question/problem is.... he told me to eat a "regular" diet for 6 weeks before the test. First of all, what is regular???? I have read so many things, some say a minimum of 2 slices of bread a day, others say 4. Some say minimum of 6 weeks others say 12. My fear is that I will have the test done and it will come back negative due to the fact that it hasn't caused enough damage in the amount of time he has given me. Unfortunately, I can NOT handle eating this way for longer than the 6 weeks. I'm counting down the days at this point...... it has made me feel awful 24 hours a day. Since I can never give my body a break for a day, I never feel good. I am so bloated, have neck and back pain, major stomach pain and almost a feeling of MSG...not sure if anyone can relate...but kind of heart racing kind of feeling. I'm looking for opinions from any of you that have been through the gluten challenge that can help me through this. I'm worried that if the test is negative....that's it and I won't really ever know. Have any of you been through it and if so... how long did you eat the gluten products before your biopsy? And did it come back positive? I truly believe I have Celiac......... but I am one of those people that would really like an official diagnosis. Please help......

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

I asked for a skin biopsy because of a DH-type rash. The biopsy came back negative (this might have been because it was done 3 weeks after 1)going off gluten and 2) a 10-day course of prednisone). The fact that it came back negative doesn't bother me so much. What bothers me is that the biopsy sites did not heal well--they itch like mad (4 months after the biopsy!) , and are hardened with quite a lot of scar tissue. They are also still quite red, and if I wear a T-shirt (it was on my arms), people look like they're really grossed out by the sight of my arm. In 20-20 hindsight, I would not do it again. Biopsies don't necessarily heal well--but I didn't know that at the time.

Guest nini

I didn't have a biopsy at all, Dr. said it wasn't needed cos my antibodies were sooooo high that there was no doubt, that and the fact that I've responded miraculously to the diet and feel terrible when exposed to even a molecule of gluten, I know for sure I have Celiac. My daughter's blood test was negative but with genetic predisposition (ME) and extremely positive dietary response, We are also convinced she has it as well. In my personal opinion biopsies are irrelevent. They can only confirm the dx IF you are consuming enough gluten IF the Dr. takes enough samples, IF the Dr. takes samples from damaged areas and IF the Lab knows how to read the test results... too many IF's for me. Listen to your bodies, if you feel better off gluten then by all means, stay off gluten. It's that simple.

CarlaB Enthusiast

CarolAnn, you sound just like me. I had figured out about carbs causing my troubles, then cut them out, not to lose weight, but because my joint pain would go away. So, after years not eating much wheat, my blood test came out negative. I tortured myself with the 6 weeks, and it still came out negative. I was so sick by the end I could hardly get out of bed. Looking back, I find it almost humorous that I felt it necessary to have the biopsy while it was quite obvious what was making me sick!!! I think we are all conditioned to feel like we need a doctor to tell us we're ill.

I did end up testing with Enterolab because their tests are more sensitive. I also got the genetic testing from them. They didn't tell me anything I didn't know, but I knew for sure it was really a life-long gluten problem, not just an allergy which might allow me to eat some occassionally. It also let me know that all my kids have the genetic tendency to the same problem.

Nancym Enthusiast
My older sister was diagnosed with celiac sprue post pregnancy about 6 years ago with blood test and biopsy, she "cheats" frequently and contacts wheat all the time.

Well, it depends on you. Your sister had postive diagnosis and still can't stay gluten free. Some people can go gluten-free without a positive diagnosis, just based on their own dietary testing. What does it take for you to make the changes you need to make? Someone in a white lab coat? Lots of people can't even adhere to the diet with a biopsy.

That was the question I asked myself. Do I know my body better than the guy in the lab coat?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,248
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kathleen weber
    Newest Member
    Kathleen weber
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      @Zuma888, The antibodies produced in response to gluten are made in the intestines.  When the body is provoked sufficiently, the antibodies overflow out of the intestines and into the blood stream.  Once in the blood stream, the antibodies can be measured with tTg IgA tests.  Three grams of gluten per day for two weeks minimum is enough gluten to make you feel the symptoms of having been glutened, but the antibodies are not in sufficient quantity to be measured in the blood. Ten grams of gluten per day for a minimum of two weeks is required to get the anti gluten antibodies at a high enough level in the blood stream to be measured by tTg IgA tests. So, no, occasional cross contamination or (heaven forbid) intentional cheat days will not be sufficient for tTg IgA testing.  You will still be making antibodies which will still be causing inflammation and damage to the intestines and body.  Histamine is released as part of the immune response to gluten.  High histamine levels lead to food sensitivities, brain fog, and body aches.   The damage done to the gastrointestinal tract affects the absorption of essential vitamins and minerals.  Malabsorption of fats can cause changes in stools.  Insufficient absorption of vitamins and minerals can cause damage to other organs like the thyroid if it can't get enough Selenium, iodine, iron, zinc, and Thiamine.  Brain fog and fatigue can be caused by low Thiamine and other B Complex vitamins.  Vitamin D is needed to regulate the immune system.  One gene is all that's needed to develop Celiac disease.  I know a Celiac diagnosis is a change that can be difficult to get your head around.  Many people go through the five stages of grief.  One stage is "bargaining".  Sounds like you're stuck there.  Every little cheat counts to your detriment.  But sticking to a gluten free diet, makes every meal a success.   Read the comments below the article... Best wishes!  Keep us posted on your progress!
    • Scott Adams
      No, I would not say this at all. If you were diagnosed with celiac disease and were gluten-free for a while, you could have gone into remission. Everyone's body is different, and some celiacs may be able to get regular contamination and not end up with damaged villi and positive antibody tests, while others who ingest tiny amounts will relapse and have full blown symptoms and flattened villi.  Only a full gluten challenge would reveal where you are at this point. Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      The most common nutrient deficiencies associated with celiac disease that may lead to testing for the condition include iron, vitamin D, folate (vitamin B9), vitamin B12, calcium, zinc, and magnesium.  Unfortunately many doctors, including my own doctor at the time, don't do extensive follow up testing for a broad range of nutrient deficiencies, nor recommend that those just diagnosed with celiac disease take a broad spectrum vitamin/mineral supplement, which would greatly benefit most, if not all, newly diagnosed celiacs.      
    • Pablohoyasaxa
      Great  post. The skin issue can be intolerable. I have been taking niacinamide for the past month and have improved with respect to the blistering lesions. 
    • knitty kitty
      I've found taking Niacin Vitamin B 3 in the form that causes flushing (nicotinic acid) helps immensely to clear my skin.  The flushing is harmless and goes away the longer Niacin is taken.  The flushing (vasodilation in the skin) helps the body get rid of the tTg 3 IgA antibodies that cause the blisters.  TTg 2 IgA antibodies are found in the blood and are measured in diagnostic testing for Celiac.  People with Dermatitis Herpetiformis make tTg 3 as well as tTg 2 antibodies.  Niacin Vitamin B3 in the non flushing form niacinamide also works without the flushing, but takes a bit longer.   I also avoid foods containing high levels of iodine because iodine activates the tTg 3 IgA antibodies to become more active and make more blisters.  I avoid kelp (nori, seaweed) and crustaceans,  eggs, dairy products, and iodized table salt.   Niacinamide and Nicotinic acid are water soluble and harmless.  I'd much rather take Niacin than Dapsone with scary side effects.  
×
×
  • Create New...