Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac Tests


Judithg

Recommended Posts

Judithg Rookie

Hi, I'm new to this board, but not completely new to living gluten-free. Several years ago I tested positive for gluten intolerance during some routine allergy testing. However, when I was tested for celiac disease (blood tests and endoscopy), the results were negative. I went on a gluten-free diet anyway, because I felt better without gluten. But because I wasn't celiac, I wasn't always careful. Whenever I would cheat a little bit, I didn't feel that bad. But if I started eating wheat everyday, I would get sick again (digestive problems, headaches, fatigue). So I was fairly careful but not strict. For the past year, I've had terrible digestive problems. When they started I realized that a couple of foods I was eating regularly had hidden gluten in them. I tried to be stricter with my diet, and I would get better than get worse again. Sometimes getting worse was directly traceable to eating some hidden gluten. Since there are more accurate tests now than there were when I was first tested for celiac, the doctor tested me again. However, he told me I didn't need to do a gluten challenge. Again I tested negative for celiac. Now I'm wondering if the fact that I was essentially gluten-free at the time of the test may have affected the results. I suppose I should just be as strict as possible about gluten and not worry about diagnosis, but I really would like some closure on the issue.

So how accurate can the test be if you're gluten-free at the time? Do people test negative sometimes for years than eventually test positive? Should I just give up on finding the answer and maintain a strict gluten-free diet?

Sorry this is long--I appreciate your feedback!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



celiacfreeman Contributor

yes you have to be have it in your system to get proper diag.

Also make sure they run the tTG test that mayo clinic recommends.

Judithg Rookie

Yep, it seems that my doc didn't quite do this right. The day that he gave me the order for the tests, he said just to go ahead and have them done that day. I knew I hadn't had any gluten for quite some time, but he said it wouldn't matter. And the two tests were fairly expensive, even after my insurance kicked in their portion. This is so frustrating! I guess I either have to have the tests done again, or I just have to go forward not knowing whether I have celiac disease or not.

mcalister14 Rookie

In fact our small intestine heals rather quickly after going gluten-free. I read an article on this site suggesting that in order to receive an accurate diagnosis, one must be eating foods with gluten for 3-6 months prior to biopsy. That sounds like such a long time though!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,677
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Nancy Magil
    Newest Member
    Nancy Magil
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the community! Generally, for a gluten challenge before celiac disease blood tests, Tylenol (acetaminophen) is considered safe and should not interfere with your antibody results. The medications you typically need to avoid are those like ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) or naproxen (Aleve) that can cause intestinal irritation, which could potentially complicate the interpretation of an endoscopy if you were to have one. However, it is absolutely crucial that you confirm this with either your gastroenterologist or your surgeon before your procedure. They know the specifics of your case and can give you the definitive green light, ensuring your surgery is comfortable and your celiac testing remains accurate. Best of luck with your surgery tomorrow
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.