Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

First Foods


Mamato2boys

Recommended Posts

Mamato2boys Contributor

I'm a newbie, so you'll have to forgive the stupid question. ^_^ My older son was diagnosed as being gluten sensitive, and it turns out my youngest has it, too. (I figured out he was getting it through my breastmilk, so I've gone gluten-free too). He's only 10 1/2 weeks old so I obviously am not feeding him solids yet, but I was just curious about that. You know how "normally" the first food is cereals (usually rice) - should I even bother with that ? I obviously know he won't be able to have things like oatmeal or barley cereal, but is cc an issue with rice cereal ? If I should skip cereals altogether, what should his first foods be ? :huh: We have a wonderful pediatrician, but he knows nothing about celiac disease and the diet, so I can't really ask him. The GI my older son saw was less than helpful, so she's not much of a resource either. :angry:


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



CarlaB Enthusiast

Babies actually do just fine on breastmilk only until they're a year old! I usually started mine on food when they'd grab it off my plate and eat it. I'm not exaggerating at all. It's somewhere around probably 6-9 months that they do that.

Mamato2boys Contributor
Babies actually do just fine on breastmilk only until they're a year old! I usually started mine on food when they'd grab it off my plate and eat it. I'm not exaggerating at all. It's somewhere around probably 6-9 months that they do that.

Yep, I know. :) I was planning on nursing him until he turned 1, but considering our family GI issues, I may have to extend that a bit. I haven't decided yet.

I was planning on trying him on solids around 6 months (if he's ready - later if he's not), and wasn't sure what I should start with. Any suggestions ?

Michi8 Contributor
Yep, I know. :) I was planning on nursing him until he turned 1, but considering our family GI issues, I may have to extend that a bit. I haven't decided yet.

I was planning on trying him on solids around 6 months (if he's ready - later if he's not), and wasn't sure what I should start with. Any suggestions ?

I'm a big proponent of extended nursing. :) There are definite benefits to nursing longer than one year...especially for a child that has health issues (whether it's allergies, intolerances or what have you.)

6 months is a fine time to start solid foods, but I know a few moms who waited until 9 months or later...it depended on their child's interest in food. My eldest loved all sorts of foods, my middle son hated anything mushy and all solids would come back up just like breastmilk did, my daughter preferred having whatever we ate (I used a baby food grinder to prepare foods.)

There is some controversy about starting with grains as a first food. Apparently all grains are hard on the gut, and that fruits and vegetables are a better choice for first foods...with grains coming into the diet much later. Of course, YMMV. :) If you choose to start with a grain, rice is probably the easiest on the tummy. I liked starting with a cereal that had nothing but rice in it (not fortified with any iron, minerals or vitamins) and mixed with breastmilk.

There is some info how and when to introduce foods to an allergic baby here (this is the guide given to me by an allergy nutritionist when I had my first baby):

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Finally, try making your own baby foods and freezing portions in an ice cube tray. That way you get the best, freshest foods and you know exactly what goes into them.

Michelle :)

Ursa Major Collaborator

Well, I found that it was the easiest and best (and cheapest) to exclusively breastfeed until about 8 or 9 months old, and then start with vegetables like carrots and potatoes (mashed or put through a blender, depending on the baby, some hate lumps). Banana is a good first fruit, as you can just mash it with a fork, and I haven't seen a baby who doesn't like bananas.

You need to add meat by the time a baby is a year old, for the iron. Because that is the time the baby's own iron stores run out, and iron is needed for brain development (and everything else, of course, as well).

By the time a baby is a year old, you just mash whatever you're having for them, no need for special baby food at all (including baby cereal), unless you're going out and need to eat on the run. You can't just hand a baby a sandwich. ;)

Mamato2boys Contributor
I'm a big proponent of extended nursing. :) There are definite benefits to nursing longer than one year...especially for a child that has health issues (whether it's allergies, intolerances or what have you.)

6 months is a fine time to start solid foods, but I know a few moms who waited until 9 months or later...it depended on their child's interest in food. My eldest loved all sorts of foods, my middle son hated anything mushy and all solids would come back up just like breastmilk did, my daughter preferred having whatever we ate (I used a baby food grinder to prepare foods.)

There is some controversy about starting with grains as a first food. Apparently all grains are hard on the gut, and that fruits and vegetables are a better choice for first foods...with grains coming into the diet much later. Of course, YMMV. :) If you choose to start with a grain, rice is probably the easiest on the tummy. I liked starting with a cereal that had nothing but rice in it (not fortified with any iron, minerals or vitamins) and mixed with breastmilk.

There is some info how and when to introduce foods to an allergic baby here (this is the guide given to me by an allergy nutritionist when I had my first baby):

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Finally, try making your own baby foods and freezing portions in an ice cube tray. That way you get the best, freshest foods and you know exactly what goes into them.

Michelle :)

Thanks for that !

I'm debating about skipping cereals altogether. I've read a few things on it that says fruits & veggies are a better first food, too. I wanted to see what the input was from everyone here, since we're all actually living with this. :D

Suzie-GFfamily Apprentice

I found out I was celiac back in the spring when my 3rd child was 5 mos old. I've kept her gluten-free because we've found out her older brother and sister are celiac too.

She was probably getting some wheat protein via breastmilk until 8 mos of age (that's when I had my biopsy). Since that time I've been gluten-free too.

When we introduced solids (around 6 months) I used mashed banana and avocado as her first and second foods, respectively. I didn't give her rice cereal- but this was because my other kids never liked it and it isn't necessary. There is enough iron in breastmilk (the amount is lower than in the iron-fortified baby cereals but it is more readily absorped). If you wanted to feed rice cereal, you could contact the manufacturer and ask about possibility of cc. There are probably some companies out there that make rice cereal on separate equipment, or in separate facilities, from wheat/barley/rye/oat baby cereals.

There is a useful pamphlet available from La Leche League that has suggestions for first foods. They suggest fruits and vegetables. They also explain why breastfed babies do not need to eat iron-fortified baby cereals.

I've offered teff cereal (made from whole grain teff) to my baby when I make it for myself- but she hasn't been interested in it.... at least not yet (11 months old now).


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Izak's Mom Apprentice
When we introduced solids (around 6 months) I used mashed banana and avocado as her first and second foods, respectively.

I was just going to suggest this - Izak loved them, mashed together - although when starting, you should do them individually to make sure there's no reaction. We tried mashed sweet potatoes too, but I found that he didn't do well with them - they came right out the other end. Mashed peas he loved, and mashed green beans. Mashed pears were a big hit too, with a little cinnamon. Carrots - I remember something from my 4th trimester class about only using jarred or canned carrots because of the nitrite content in raw ones, even organic. Same thing with broccoli or spinach I think? I don't quite remember. Mashed cauliflower is good too. I also gave him these baby cracker things called Open Original Shared Link which he loved - and still does - but it's a rice-based product. Good luck!

aprilh Apprentice

My naturopath Dr. Told me that Babies actually develop the enzymes to digest meats BEFORE grains. In fact, when I found out I had this gluten problem, I learned that the Chinese have a very low rate of it and they hold off feeding children Grains (including Rice) until about 2 years old. This gives the child's body an opportunity to develop properly to be able to digest. I think that avacado is a very good first food. Just smash it up. You can start at 4-6 months with that. It has the good fats for brain development. As with all people with food sensitivities, it would be a good idea to really rotate the foods. Give it once, then wait 7-10 days before trying another new food.

Also, Sweet potatoes are very high in vitamins and minerals and easy on the digestive system. Bananas, not too many because they can be mucous forming in excess. Home made green beans, squash, canteloupe. All of those are good. Peas are high in iron.

Michi8 Contributor
My naturopath Dr. Told me that Babies actually develop the enzymes to digest meats BEFORE grains. In fact, when I found out I had this gluten problem, I learned that the Chinese have a very low rate of it and they hold off feeding children Grains (including Rice) until about 2 years old. This gives the child's body an opportunity to develop properly to be able to digest. I think that avacado is a very good first food. Just smash it up. You can start at 4-6 months with that. It has the good fats for brain development. As with all people with food sensitivities, it would be a good idea to really rotate the foods. Give it once, then wait 7-10 days before trying another new food.

Also, Sweet potatoes are very high in vitamins and minerals and easy on the digestive system. Bananas, not too many because they can be mucous forming in excess. Home made green beans, squash, canteloupe. All of those are good. Peas are high in iron.

Interesting to hear about food introduction in China! I had no idea...I thought that congee (rice porridge) was a common first food. :)

In terms of introducing to foods to an allergic baby, avocado and cateloupe are fairly high on the allergen scale, and ideally should be introduced at a later age (avacado after 9 months, and cateloupe at 12 months or later, just as with watermelon.) Babies gets all the fat (and other important nutrients) they need from breastmilk or formula for the first year...introduced foods make up a small part of nutrition during that time.

Michelle

aprilh Apprentice
Interesting to hear about food introduction in China! I had no idea...I thought that congee (rice porridge) was a common first food. :)

In terms of introducing to foods to an allergic baby, avocado and cateloupe are fairly high on the allergen scale, and ideally should be introduced at a later age (avacado after 9 months, and cateloupe at 12 months or later, just as with watermelon.) Babies gets all the fat (and other important nutrients) they need from breastmilk or formula for the first year...introduced foods make up a small part of nutrition during that time.

Michelle

I guess I could be wrong. I thought that is what I read, but maybe they were talking about grains OTHER than rice. I always thought avacado to be hypo allergenic. I do agree with breastfeeding (formula) for the first year.

AndreaB Contributor

Wow,

I find all this interesting. I breastfeed my first two for 2 years 10 months. Hoping to go that long with my third.

I never knew about the cereals being hard to digest. I don't think the cereal I buy is cc'd. My son reacted to the oatmeal I tried, but has been fine on the rice cereal. I started him on solids when he was 7 months old. Don't remember if it was rice cereal or fruit though.

That's interesting about the iron too. I was told they started running out of iron stores around 6 months. Myself and oldest two children have tested positive through enterolab. Since the baby won't be eating gluten we'll probably just have him gene tested. He obviously already reacts to gluten, the oatmeal was test enough.

Michi8 Contributor
That's interesting about the iron too. I was told they started running out of iron stores around 6 months.

Iron supplementation is a bigger issue for babies who are not breastfed. Breastmilk does not have tons of iron, but the iron it does have is very bioavailable, unlike iron fortification in foods or through supplements (which can be constipating/hard on the gut.) Babies who breastfeed past six months continue to get iron from mom. From what I understand, though, giving baby an iron supplement can interfere with absorption of the iron from breastmilk.

When I started solids with my eldest, I chose rice cereal. At that time, Healthy Times made a plain, unfortified, brown rice cereal that was perfect. A couple of years later, they bent to customer & industry pressure to fortify their cereals. I was not a happy mommy about that. :(

Michelle

CarlaB Enthusiast
Yep, I know. :) I was planning on nursing him until he turned 1, but considering our family GI issues, I may have to extend that a bit. I haven't decided yet.

I was planning on trying him on solids around 6 months (if he's ready - later if he's not), and wasn't sure what I should start with. Any suggestions ?

I nursed till they weaned themselves, usually just before their second birthday (after they were one year old, it was pretty much naptime, bedtime, and first thing in the morning, but through the night when they were teething).

I would just give him what you are eating. Use your fork to mash your veggies, and let him taste them. Before one year old, the diet will mainly be the breastmilk. I never bought special food for the babies, it was just whatever we were having, so I never dealt with the cereals or babyfood. If we were having something spicy, I would set aside some for the baby before spicing it up.

Suzie-GFfamily Apprentice
Wow,

I find all this interesting. I breastfeed my first two for 2 years 10 months. Hoping to go that long with my third.

I never knew about the cereals being hard to digest. I don't think the cereal I buy is cc'd. My son reacted to the oatmeal I tried, but has been fine on the rice cereal. I started him on solids when he was 7 months old. Don't remember if it was rice cereal or fruit though.

That's interesting about the iron too. I was told they started running out of iron stores around 6 months. Myself and oldest two children have tested positive through enterolab. Since the baby won't be eating gluten we'll probably just have him gene tested. He obviously already reacts to gluten, the oatmeal was test enough.

My understanding is that healthy, full-term babies have enough iron stores for AT LEAST 6 months. So this is why it is usually recommended to add some iron-rich foods into their diets at around that time- for example, meats. It is also beneficial to delay the introduction of cow's milk till at least a year of age and to limit the amount of cow's milk when it is introduced, because cow's milk can cause problems with iron absorption.

I don't think there is enough research yet to know when babies absolutely need to have more iron in their diet, other than the iron they get from breastmilk. I've heard some anecdotal reports from mothers whose breastfed children didn't eat solids till around a year, or a little later in a few cases, and their iron levels were fine when tested.

The recommendations to add more iron to a baby's diet at around 6 months are based on conservative estimates of when a baby might begin to need more iron. Iron is a concern because it is needed for the baby's rapid growth. If iron levels were too low, there could be potential problems with brain growth and other things. The medical community probably wants to err on the side of caution because iron deficiency can potentially cause long-term problems with cognitive functioning as well as motor function- so they'd prefer to be safe and ensure a baby has adequate iron stores and doesn't become anemic.

Apparently, it is easy to check whether a child has adequate stores of iron- so if they aren't eating a lot of solids this could be easily be done.

If a baby was born prematurely, it's possible that they might need iron supplementation earlier because the baby builds up the majority of their iron stores after week 30 of gestation.

Suzanne

shai76 Explorer

My son had to start solids early because of his reflux. He did have rice cereal, but I bought the Cream of Rice stuff because it is definitly gluten free. I also started him with strained squash and sweet potatos, carrots and stuff like that. I started him on beans and peas too young though, and he is allergic to them now (as I am).

Mamato2boys Contributor
It is also beneficial to delay the introduction of cow's milk till at least a year of age and to limit the amount of cow's milk when it is introduced, because cow's milk can cause problems with iron absorption.

Personally, we will never do cow's milk. My older son is sensitive to it anyway, and during my research to try to sort out his issues I learned a lot about cow's milk and the effect it has on our bodies, and am now disgusted by it. My older son has never liked it, and when he was two called it "yucky milk" when we did the challenge at his pediatrician's office. He has always been above the 97th percentile for height, and at least 50th for weight, so when I told the pediatrician that I have no intention of either of the boys drinking cow's milk, he was fine with that because he knows I'm on top of their nutrition. :) He unfortunately knows very little about allergies and gluten issues, but is honest enough to tell me that rather than trying to BS me with answers, which is why I asked you guys - the experts! :D;)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,684
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Betty Siebert
    Newest Member
    Betty Siebert
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.