Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Positive Blood Test, Why Biopsy?

eileen.c

Recommended Posts

eileen.c Newbie
eileen.c
Posted

My 10 month old daughter was tested for celiac... several of the markers came back negative, but one returned positive.

I'm meeting with the pediatric gastro doctor tomorrow, but I'm just wondering if anyone has an opinion on the necessity of putting her through a biopsy. Isn't a positive blood test fairly reliable? My pediatrican insists she needs the biopsy, too, for a definitive diagnosis, but the thought of her going through this makes me queasy.

How tough a procedure is this for an infant?

Thanks.

Eileen

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


ptkds Community Regular
ptkds
Posted

My 18 m old dd tested positive w/ blood work only. I decided not to put her through the biopsy after I tested positive through blood work. Now my dd#2 has also tested positive through blood work. I feel that the blood results must be accurate for us since there are 3 positives in our family. But others may have a better answer for you.

I know that my dd would have had to have an IV which is the worst part of the biopsy. They sleep throught the rest. Waking up from anesthesia can make a child feel really confused and scared, too.

ptkds

Ursa Major Collaborator
Ursa Major
Posted

Especially with infants, I see no need for a biopsy (my own opinion, of course). If the bloodwork is positive, and she has a positive dietary response, that would be enough for most (reasonable) doctors to at least diagnose her with gluten intolerance. The most valid test is trying the diet, no matter what doctors say.

Doctors still claim that the biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing celiac disease. Really, it's the OLD standard, as that idea is fifty years old, and outdated. Too bad most doctors haven't caught onto that yet.

So, you're right to question the need for a biopsy. I personally wouldn't put my baby through that. Especially because it's very unreliable with young children anyway, and a false negative is very likely. But of course, it's your choice.

Guest cassidy
Guest cassidy
Posted

If the bloodwork is positive, then she has celiac. Some doctors insist on a biopsy, but the results of the biopsy aren't going to change the positive blood work. Also, if she feels better on the diet, that is a sure way to confirm the blood test results.

As far as treating her, you don't need a biopsy to go gluten-free, so if you are ok with not getting one, then I wouldn't do it. I'm sure your child has been through enough being sick that she would appreciate not having to go through that.

Guest nini
Guest nini
Posted

the biopsy won't tell you anything you don't already know. The blood test was positive, (yes even one marker is enough to be positive). I did not put my daughter through a biopsy and my Dr. said the biopsy was not necessary for me because my blood work was positive. As Ursula said the biopsy is the "OLD standard" of dx (love that!) And most Dr.s haven't caught on yet that this kind of thinking is outdated and MISSES so many pre celiacs that are def. Gluten Intolerant. The biopsy is only looking for confirmed damage, WOULD YOU WAIT UNTIL YOU HAD FULL BLOWN HEART DISEASE TO CHANGE YOUR LIFE IF YOU HAD THE PRECURSORS TO IT? NO! You would do something about it. The idea that Dr.s want to wait until there is confirmed damage with Celiac before doing anything about it is just insane. Isn't preventative medicine so much better? Positive dietary response along with positive blood test results will be your most valid diagnostic tool (the blood test can only screen for it) the diet will confirm the dx. If the diet helps then viola! You have your answer.

Jestgar Rising Star
Jestgar
Posted
Some doctors insist on a biopsy....

All this is doing is proving something to the doctor. If you need the doctor to do this, then do it. If you don't need it, don't do it.

You are in charge.

eileen.c Newbie
eileen.c
Posted
  • Author

Thanks for all the replies. The doctor told me that he considers the celiac blood test for children under 5 to be very unreliable and so he's strongly urging the biopsy. (If it's so unreliable, why do it??)

I might allow the biopsy just to rule out anything in addition to celiac... he mentioned ulcerative colitis and Crohn's.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Ursa Major Collaborator
Ursa Major
Posted
Thanks for all the replies. The doctor told me that he considers the celiac blood test for children under 5 to be very unreliable and so he's strongly urging the biopsy. (If it's so unreliable, why do it??)

I might allow the biopsy just to rule out anything in addition to celiac... he mentioned ulcerative colitis and Crohn's.

Actually, both the blood test and the biopsy are very unreliable in young children. But you don't get false positives, only false negatives.

It is highly unlikely for a baby to have Crohn's or ulcerative colitis already. Besides the fact that they are often caused by celiac disease, and usually respond well to a gluten-free diet.

Really, the diet is the absolute best test for a child that young. If she doesn't respond to the diet, you can still do the endoscopy to look for other things. Why not do the easy, non-invasive thing first?

Lisa Mentor
Lisa
Posted
Thanks for all the replies. The doctor told me that he considers the celiac blood test for children under 5 to be very unreliable and so he's strongly urging the biopsy. (If it's so unreliable, why do it??)

I might allow the biopsy just to rule out anything in addition to celiac... he mentioned ulcerative colitis and Crohn's.

Just a little input from me..... An endoscopy test for celiac is NOT the same to test for Crohn's.

Chrohn's is tested through the large intestines with a colonoscopy, Celiac is tested in the small intestines through and endoscopy.

Colitis is tested through the large intestines.

If you have a positive blood test, I certainly be would be satisfied with that and begin a gluten free diet for your baby. If you do not see improvement within a months time, at that point would I pursue other testing.

You doctor is asking you to do TWO invasive test on your infant. The test is not difficult for adults, but an infant?

I know that this is a difficult decision because we want to protect, give them the best care that we can and keep them happy healthy and safe.

Good luck and I wish wellness for you and your child. :)

Guest nini
Guest nini
Posted

the biopsy won't rule out anything... it can't even rule out Celiac. Honestly, especially with a positive marker on one so young, try the diet first, if you don't have miraculous results you can pursue other testing that doesn't involve keeping your child on gluten IF it's the problem... Positive dietary response is THE MOST VALID diagnostic tool for gluten intolerance/Celiac, the biopsy can ONLY confirm it IF they find damage and many infants and children with pre celiac don't have damage yet, a lot of adults don't either... but, when you remove gluten from the diet, whoa! look out! miraculous results! There can be no other explanation!

My daughter's blood work was negative after I was positively dx'ed. And her ped. GI said she couldn't possibly have Celiac, that she "just had IBS" or toddlers diarrhea and that I needed to (get this) FEED HER MORE WHOLE WHEAT! WRONG! I got her pediatricians support on trying the diet and within DAYS I had an entirely different happier healthier child. At her last check up (her six year check up for first grade) her pediatrician was just blown away by how healthy she is, she is healthier than probably 95 % of her patients... (maybe all of them!) She said she "rarely sees a child this age, THIS healthy".

I know that standard medical protocol is to push for the biopsy, but the fact is the biopsy as gold standard methodology misses far too many gluten intolerants, pre celiacs and even celiacs. Yep, it happens, I know far too many people that have had negative biopsy year after year and continued to get sicker until one day their biopsy came back with TOTAL villous atrophy...

do what you think you have to, but I personally couldn't and wouldn't put my daughter through a biopsy. My dr. didn't even feel that one was necessary for me since my blood work was so highly positive and I responded so well to the diet.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast
KaitiUSA
Posted

I am not a fan of biopsies...they can rule celiac in but not out. I personally just went with my positive blood test...he was sure that I had it.

dahams04 Apprentice
dahams04
Posted

Just wanted to add my son had the biopsy right before his 3rd B-day. It wasnt that bad, he was just a little out of it after teh anestisia wore off. My niece (5) also had the biopsy and while in there they found another disease. ( eosonaphilic esophgitis sp?) So it can help. Go with your heart. If you feel she needs it or you need it to feel more secure I say go for it.

Nancym Enthusiast
Nancym
Posted

Here's some info about Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Open Original Shared Link

(I was curious, so I looked it up!) Basically it is food allergies causing inflammation of the esophogus.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,265
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    V Arnold
    Newest Member
    V Arnold
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • RMJ
      Kan-101

      By RMJ · Posted

      It is more likely code for “we think there really was a good response to the treatment, but it was small or in a small percent of subjects so it would take a large clinical trial to try to prove it.”
    • Dana0207
      Celiac symptoms

      By Dana0207 · Posted

      Thank you so much for your replies. Luckily the rash went away when I completely swore off gluten. It took several months but I have not had a flare in months. So a biopsy is no longer possible. The itch was terrible and apart from bleaching my skin the steroid lotions and potions did nothing. The Gliadin is for accidents and shall be a part of my travel kit from now on. This past exposure has made a me a little leery about eating anything that was not cooked in my kitchen or a dedicated gluten-free restaurant. As much as I used to love baked goods, I am cured and have become quite the gluten free baker to the point that friends and family forget that my cakes/cookies/and bread are not "real". I guess I will have to wait for the new blood test to come out to get confirmation but I have a suspicion that the rash was dermatitis herpetiformis.
    • Jmartes71
      Nateral remedies

      By Jmartes71 · Posted

      Hello, I just wanted to share with the frustration of skin issues and seeing dermatologist and medications not working for years, I did my own healing experiment. As of last week I have been taking a drop internally under the tongue of Vetiver and putting on topically on sores Yellow/Pom.I am seeing a extreme difference at a rapid time.Im also noticing my nails a little harder. Ive always been into natural properties because I feel its safer for the body.I know short time, but really seeing a difference. I also feel the the trapped gases that causes bloating helps break down as well.Curious if any body else can benefit from and has tried. Products is made by Doterra by Dr Hill
    • Scott Adams
      Is Caputo gluten free flour really free of gluten?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      We have a category of articles on this topic if you really want to dive into it: https://www.celiac.com/celiac-disease/miscellaneous-information-on-celiac-disease/gluten-free-diet-celiac-disease-amp-codex-alimentarius-wheat-starch/
    • Scott Adams
      Celiac symptoms

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I agree with @trents, and the rash you described, especially its location and resistance to steroids, sounds highly characteristic of dermatitis herpetiformis, which is the skin manifestation of celiac disease. The severe and prolonged reaction you're describing five days after a small exposure is, while extreme, not unheard of for those with a high sensitivity; the systemic inflammatory response can absolutely last for several days or even weeks, explaining why you still don't feel right. Your plan to avoid a formal gluten challenge is completely understandable given the severity of your reactions, and many choose the same path for their well-being. While experiences with GliadinX (they are a sponsor here) are mixed, some people do report a reduction in the severity of their symptoms when taken with accidental gluten, though it is crucial to remember it is not a cure or a license to eat gluten and its effectiveness can vary from person to person. For now, the absolute best advice is to continue being hyper-vigilant about cross-contamination—buffets are notoriously high-risk, even with good intentions. Connecting with a gastroenterologist and a dermatologist who specialize in celiac disease is essential for navigating diagnosis and management moving forward. Wishing you a swift recovery from this last exposure. If you have DH you will likely also want to avoid iodine, which is common in seafoods and dairy products, as it can exacerbate symptoms in some people. This article may also be helpful as it offers various ways to relieve the itch:  
×
×
  • Create New...