Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Maybe Eating Boxed Cereal Isn't What We Should Choose.


bluejeangirl

Recommended Posts

bluejeangirl Contributor

I thought I would post this here since many of us will try and clean up our diets as a new years resolution. What do you think of this article? It really amazed me...would love to hear any comments. Sorry animals were used to test results.

Gail

Open Original Shared Link


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

That is very interesting information and doesn't surprise me a bit. We rarely have those cereals in the house.

codetalker Contributor

Cereal boxes being more nutritious than the cereal inside is a well-known urban legend. It was featured in an episode of the show, Mythbusters. Of course, that does not mean the tests were not actually performed.

Personally, I stopped eating processed cereal a long time ago. There are a lot of better, tastier and cheaper things to eat in the morning.

Nancym Enthusiast

Read "The Omnivore's Dilemma" and find out how horrible these boxed cereals are on our environment and economy not to mention our health. Great book!

ianm Apprentice

I'm with codetalker on this one. I stopped eating that junk a long time ago and my son only eats it once in a great while. Processed cereals, even gluten free ones, make me lethargic and bloated. If I'm going to feel like that I might as well eat gluten.

plantime Contributor

Using critical thinking, I see no evidence whatsoever that this story is true. I can make up things like those so-called experiments, and put them on a website. Without proper referencing, I cannot check to see if I am being told the truth. An article like this would not change my mind if I ate cereal every day.

Kaycee Collaborator

I chose for myself earlier this month to give away gluten-free cereal, 1st because of the expense and secondly because I felt it wasn't doing me any good as far as the battle for loosing weight goes. Thirdly, I am finding eating too many carbohydrates like cereal, pastas and bread seem too make me feel lethargic.

So breakfast, it is either yoghurt and fruit, or leftovers or even occassionally toast.

Cathy


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



RiceGuy Collaborator

The article seems to specifically refer to those cereals which are made by extrusion, like rice crispies, cocoa puffs, etc. The one thing that is not clear to me from this article is whether those plain puffed grain cereals like Open Original Shared Link, Open Original Shared Link, and Open Original Shared Link are actually extruded. To me they don't appear to be, but are the actual grain which has been expanded in a similar way as making popcorn. In this case, there wouldn't be any more protein, which the article suggests is the case with the extruded ones.

If simply puffing a grain is bad, then I'd think the article would mention popcorn. Since it doesn't I must conclude that the cereals I referenced above are not subject to the findings of the article.

ArtGirl Enthusiast

I'm with Dessa. We don't really know if this was a legitimate study, and, since it wasn't published, there's no way to verify.

I don't think that an occasional consumption of a high-carb/low protein cereal is bad for one's health (even an occasional nibble on a cereal box ;) - the problem is the large amounts that many people consume of these things rather than good proteins and vegetables and fiber and all those other good foods. It is very sad that many of our children live on processed cereals - breakfast, lunch and dinner and snacks inbetween.

Nancym Enthusiast

So regardless of the reason, some of us feel cereal for breakfast not the best idea.

Lets share what people eat and what makes them feel best.

When I eat breakfast it is usually fairly high protein, it sticks with me for hours and hours. I was at a loss when I gave up cheese (dairy) because to me, cheese made eggs palatable. But I found a couple of other ways of fixing eggs I really like:

Scrambled with fresh grated nutmeg and topped with steaming hot berries.

Or

Scrambled with green onions and diced canadian ham. Quite good even without cheese.

Another good breakfast was I got these chicken/turkey sausages (very short, nice ingredient list) from Trader Joes and zapped two in the microwave (they're big).

If I'm VERY organized sometimes I make pancakes out of almond meal, flax meal, coconut flour (some or all of the them), egg and coconut milk and baking powder. Again, topped with berries.

And occassionally I make egg crepes, just egg thinned with water and cooked like a crepe and roll up some warmed, thickened berries and/or lemon curd.

If I'm just interested in speed eating, I grab some pecans, walnuts, almonds. Stuff like that.

codetalker Contributor
Scrambled with fresh grated nutmeg and topped with steaming hot berries.

Or

Scrambled with green onions and diced canadian ham. Quite good even without cheese.

Another good breakfast was I got these chicken/turkey sausages (very short, nice ingredient list) from Trader Joes and zapped two in the microwave (they're big).

If I'm VERY organized sometimes I make pancakes out of almond meal, flax meal, coconut flour (some or all of the them), egg and coconut milk and baking powder. Again, topped with berries.

And occassionally I make egg crepes, just egg thinned with water and cooked like a crepe and roll up some warmed, thickened berries and/or lemon curd.

If I'm just interested in speed eating, I grab some pecans, walnuts, almonds. Stuff like that.

Sounds delicious.

My breakfasts are usually very simple, such as:

Brown rice, cinnamon and raisins.

Sweet potatoes, raisins and honey.

Boiled eggs and boiled potatoes.

If time permits, waffles or pancakes.

Occasionally, poached fish and boiled potatoes.

Kaycee Collaborator
Another good breakfast was I got these chicken/turkey sausages (very short, nice ingredient list) from Trader Joes and zapped two in the microwave (they're big).

I so agree, even if it is labelled gluten free and has a list a mile long of ingredients, I will not go there. But here is where I fall flat on my face, I don't mind the rest of my family eating that stuff. What is wrong with me?

Cathy

plantime Contributor

Nothing is wrong with you, Cathy. You're human, just like us. ;)

For breakfast, I like to eat the previous night's leftovers or a fruit/yogurt smoothie. I only use 100% fruit juices, real fruit, and lite vanilla yogurt in my smoothies. I have gotten to where I don't like sorting through a long list of ingredients to determine if I can eat something or not.

Nancym Enthusiast
I so agree, even if it is labelled gluten free and has a list a mile long of ingredients, I will not go there.

I think it is good people are doing that. I was looking at some possible Rice Dream ice cream and tried to read the ingredient list. It was about 4" long, teeny, teeny type... I just gave up and put it back! If they need to have that many ingredients, it can't be good for me.

plantime Contributor

Maybe we need to let the manufacturers know that we have no desire or inclination to read through the impossibly small fine print of a mile-long ingredients list. I sure don't need to eat all of the chemicals they add to food to make it "better" for me!

Kaycee Collaborator

It will be hard to change what manufacturers do, as they will argue it is the general populace that wants food that lasts, looks good and tastes nice. That is where the problem is, we might be reading labels, and know what is in foods, but the general population who doesn't have allergies or intolerances (that they know of) is quite unlikely to even bother with reading labels, or even care what is in their food, unless they are into health issues. That might be quite a generalisation, but I was one of them. I only started to read labels to check the fat content and calorific quantities in food while I was dieting. But did I get a shock when I started reading labels to find out what I was acutally eating.

Cathy

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Paulaannefthimiou's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Bob red mill gluten free oats

    2. - trents replied to jenniber's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Disaccharide deficient, confusing biopsy results, no blood test

    3. - Paulaannefthimiou posted a topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Bob red mill gluten free oats

    4. - jenniber replied to jenniber's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Disaccharide deficient, confusing biopsy results, no blood test

    5. - trents replied to SamAlvi's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      High TTG-IgG and Normal TTG-IgA

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,849
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jadelucia
    Newest Member
    Jadelucia
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Not necessarily. The "Gluten Free" label means not more than 20ppm of gluten in the product which is often not enough for super sensitive celiacs. You would need to be looking for "Certified Gluten Free" (GFCO endorsed) which means no more than 10ppm of gluten. Having said that, "Gluten Free" doesn't mean that there will necessarily be more gluten than "Certified Gluten" in any given batch run. It just means there could be. 
    • trents
      I think it is wise to seek a second opinion from a GI doc and to go on a gluten free diet in the meantime. The GI doc may look at all the evidence, including the biopsy report, and conclude you don't need anything else to reach a dx of celiac disease and so, there would be no need for a gluten challenge. But if the GI doc does want to do more testing, you can worry about the gluten challenge at that time. But between now and the time of the appointment, if your symptoms improve on a gluten free diet, that is more evidence. Just keep in mind that if a gluten challenge is called for, the bare minimum challenge length is two weeks of the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten, which is about the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat bread. But, I would count on giving it four weeks to be sure.
    • Paulaannefthimiou
      Are Bobresmill gluten free oats ok for sensitive celiacs?
    • jenniber
      thank you both for the insights. i agree, im going to back off on dairy and try sucraid. thanks for the tip about protein powder, i will look for whey protein powder/drinks!   i don’t understand why my doctor refused to order it either. so i’ve decided i’m not going to her again, and i’m going to get a second opinion with a GI recommended to me by someone with celiac. unfortunately my first appointment isn’t until February 17th. do you think i should go gluten free now or wait until after i meet with the new doctor? i’m torn about what i should do, i dont know if she is going to want to repeat the endoscopy, and i know ill have to be eating gluten to have a positive biopsy. i could always do the gluten challenge on the other hand if she does want to repeat the biopsy.    thanks again, i appreciate the support here. i’ve learned a lot from these boards. i dont know anyone in real life with celiac.
    • trents
      Let me suggest an adjustment to your terminology. "Celiac disease" and "gluten intolerance" are the same. The other gluten disorder you refer to is NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) which is often referred to as being "gluten sensitive". Having said that, the reality is there is still much inconsistency in how people use these terms. Since celiac disease does damage to the small bowel lining it often results in nutritional deficiencies such as anemia. NCGS does not damage the small bowel lining so your history of anemia may suggest you have celiac disease as opposed to NCGS. But either way, a gluten-free diet is in order. NCGS can cause bodily damage in other ways, particularly to neurological systems.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.