Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac Panel Blood Tests


sMann

Recommended Posts

sMann Newbie

How accurate are they? I've been gluten-free for about 18 months, and the doctor said my blood shows no sign of antibodies (or something like that). Does this necessarily mean I am safe to have gluten, because I know for a fact that it causes me to have bloody mucus.

Thank you,

Steve


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Sharon C. Explorer

A blood test now should show no antibodies if you've been gluten free 18 months. Going back to gluten knowing it causes bloody mucus seems like a bad choice.

tarnalberry Community Regular

The blood tests are tests for antibodies to gluten - reactions to gluten. If there's no gluten in your body, there's no resonse, and no antibodies to find. That's why they often test in 6- or 12- month intervals in order to verify that blood tests show no antibodies.

If you originally tested gluten free, or know otherwise from your symptomatic history, that you are gluten intolerant, then you need to remain gluten free for the rest of your life.

sMann Newbie

Thanks guys, I knew something wasn't right. Are doctors honestly that ignorant to things like this or what?

CMCM Rising Star

If there's one thing that characterizes celiac disease, it's that of near total ignorance about it. I have yet to meet a doctor who knows anything at all about it. My own GP told me "You know a lot more than I do about celiac disease." And this state of ignorance has persisted for DECADES......it's just not taught in medical school in this country. Doctors in Europe are quite knowledgeable, though. Since very few doctors know about it in the U.S., relatively few people are diagnosed. It's pathetic, but has meant that those of us with celiac disease tend to diagnose ourselves thru various means. Unfortunately, huge numbers of people suffer throughout their lives and never learn what their problem is/was. Knowledge is everything, so my advice is always to read read read and learn learn learn. "Dangerous Grains" is a good place to start (it's on Amazon for about $10).

Thanks guys, I knew something wasn't right. Are doctors honestly that ignorant to things like this or what?
happygirl Collaborator

I think about Celiac testing like diabetes testing.

When a person with diabetes who doesn't know it yet is tested, their blood sugar levels are all out of whack.

When a person with Celiac who doesn't know it yet is tested, their Celiac blood panel is (often-not definitively) out of whack.

When a diabetic gains strict control of their diet and learns to manage their diet, when they test their blood sugar, it is normal. It doesn't mean that they dont have diabetes anymore. It means that they are doing the necessary steps to prevent problems. When they start eating bad, their sugars would go up again.

When a Celiac is in strict control of their diet, when they test their Celiac panels, they return to normal (may take a little while for some, but in general, on a strict gluten free diet, they return to 'normal ranges.') It means they are doing the necessary steps to prevent the Celiac reaction (i.e., the celiac reaction only occurs when gluten is ingested). When they start eating gluten again, their numbers would go up again.

Hope that clarifies. And yes, in terms of Celiac, doctors can certainly be that ignorant. We could write a book on the ignorant things GIs have said to us....and your experience mirrors MANY MANY others!

Having negative blood work to a Celiac on a strict gluten free diet does not mean that you can eat gluten again. It means you aren't eating gluten and causing a reaction---which is a good thing!

sMann Newbie

I'm just confused as to the whole antibodies thing. If your body produces antibodies for something, do they not stay in your system forever? Isn't that how vaccines work? Thanks for the support thus far.

-Steve


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tarnalberry Community Regular

Not all antibodies work the same way, and no - not all antibodies stay in the system for ever. There isn't enough 'space' in the body (and I mean that literally) to hold antibodies to *everything* that your immune system produces an antibody to. It may produce antibodies for a while, but the immune system is somewhat intelligent (no, I don't mean 'intelligent' in the conscious way, but chemically clever, if you will) in that it doesn't continually produce antibodies without a catalyst in all situations. In the case of some diseases, some portions of the immune system will 'keep on file' (in various cells designed for the purpose) antibodies, but even this isn't forever, and isn't in all cases, and is more the case is diseases. (The actual chemical process involved in celiac disease is a bit different, which may be the reason for the misunderstanding, now that I think about it.)

sMann Newbie

Makes sense. Celiac disease isn't a traditional disease after all. Thanks for clarifying.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy

    2. - Ginger38 replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      4

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    3. - Mari replied to Jmartes71's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      18

      My only proof

    4. - Ginger38 replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,471
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    731049
    Newest Member
    731049
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover from such a challenge, so why do this if you already know that gluten is the culprit and you won't be eating it anyway?  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS--but those in this group will usually have negative tests, or at best, elevated antibodies that don't reach the level of official positive. Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score.  Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis. The same is true for blood test results. Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion (some doctors apparently believe that this means the patient can decide if they want more testing or to go gluten-free). There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many patients are not told to eat gluten daily, lots of it, for the 6-8 week period leading up to their blood test, nor asked whether or not they've been eating gluten. Some patients even report to their doctors that they've been gluten-free for weeks or months before their blood tests, yet their doctors incorrectly say nothing to them about how this can affect their test, and create false negative results. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!), and the other 1 or 2 tests are negative.  Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease. These patients may end up on strong prescriptions for life to control their itching which also may have many negative side effects, for example Dapsone. Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer needlessly and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting celiac disease tests, but luckily some will find out about non-celiac gluten sensitivity on their own and go gluten-free and recover from their symptoms. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your health issues, and you've gone gluten-free, because many people will never figure this out.    
    • Ginger38
      It has been the most terrible illness ever! Going on 3 weeks now… I had chicken pox as a kid… crazy how much havoc this dormant virus has caused after being reactivated! No idea what even caused it to fire back up. I’m scared this pain and sensitivity is just never going to improve or go away 
    • Mari
      OKJmartes. Skin and eyes. Also anxiety and frustration. I have read that Celiacs have more skin problems than people who do not have Celiacs. I take increased levels of Vit. D3, very high levels of B12 and an eating part of an avocado every day. KnittyKitty and others here can add what they take for skin health. A Dermatologist might identify the type of skin condition. By eyes you may mean eyesight problems not just irritated, red eyes. It is not very difficult to get a diagnosis of which eye condition is affecting your vision but much more difficult to find an effective remedy. The ophthalmologists I have seen have been only a little helpful. There seems to have been some advances in eye treatments that most of them are completely ignorant of or just won't add to their treatment plans.  Forcertain you may as well buy some remedy from a facebook ad but that is obviously risky and may actually damafe your eyes. However it is known that certain supplements , taken at the effectivelevels do help with eyesight. Two of them are Luten and zanthamin (spelling?)and certain anti-oxidants such as bilberry..    Hope this helps.
    • Ginger38
      I refused to do the gluten challenge for a long time because I knew how sick I would be: I have always had and still have positive antibodies and have so many symptoms my  GI was 💯 sure I would have a positive biopsy. I didn’t want to make myself sick to get a negative biopsy and be more confused by all this.  He couldn’t guarantee me a negative biopsy meant no celiac bc there may not be damage yet or it’s possible to miss biopsies where there’s damage but he was so sure and convinced me I needed that biopsy I went back on gluten. It was a terrible experience! I took pictures of the bloating and swelling and weight gain during the challenge. I gained 9 pounds, looked pregnant, was in pain , couldn’t work or function without long naps and the brain fog was debilitating. And in the end he didn’t get a positive biopsy… so I wish I had never wasted my time or health going through it. I haven’t been truly straightened  out since and I am currently battling a shingles infection at 43 and I can’t help but wonder if the stress I put my body under to try and get an official diagnosis has caused all this. Best of luck to you - whatever you decide. It’s not a fun thing to go through and I still don’t have the answers I was looking for 
    • Scott Adams
      It's completely understandable to struggle with the gluten challenge, especially when it impacts your health and studies so significantly. Your experience of feeling dramatically better without gluten is a powerful clue, whether it points to celiac disease or non-celiac gluten sensitivity. It's very wise of you and your doctor to pause the challenge until your holidays, prioritizing your immediate well-being and exams. To answer your questions, yes, it is possible for blood tests to be negative initially and become positive later as the disease progresses, which is why the biopsy remains the gold standard. Many, many people find the gluten challenge incredibly difficult due to the return of debilitating symptoms, so you are certainly not alone in that struggle. Wishing you the best for your exams and for obtaining clearer answers when you're able to proceed.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.