Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Saw The Ped Today & He's Not Happy With The Gastro.


vampella

Recommended Posts

vampella Contributor

So we saw the ped today after seeing the HORRIBLE gastro on Thursday. she was rude, why are you here if she's no longer sick, why are you waisting my time? and if the ttg say's neg it's neg they are 100 % accurate and so on, I left in tears.

Her ped say's he believes it's celiac's and not to worry about that gastro and agreed that I should file a complaint against her with the college of physicians & surgeons, So I am.

He said don't you dare take her off the gluten-free diet and doens't want to see her for 2 months unless she's not doing well.

he also said that some people take tests as being the be all and end all when they aren't, no test is 100% right from the peds mouth.

I said ya I work in veterinary medicine and I could give her 20 examples of tests being inaccurate.

Has anyone else ever come across Dr's that think tests are 100% and if it's neg that's all there is to it?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



MySuicidalTurtle Enthusiast

Good for you for not listening to her. Some doctors do not want to look at the results from actually living on the diet but rather what their tests say, so, you know she feels better gluten-free and that's that.

taweavmo3 Enthusiast

My experience has been that a doctor will not recommend the diet until there is a positive blood test. Even when I explained to our pediatrician how much better my 2 year old was doing on the diet (blood test was -) he said it was simply a coincidence, even with the strong family history. Unfortunately, I know the feeling all too well of leaving a doctors office in tears, as I'm sure many on here do!

Sounds like you have a GREAT pediatrician.....forget the GI doc, and just keep up the good work!

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

I had a doctor actually LIE to me and tell me my tests were normal--and they were not.

I'm sorry you had such a frustrating day, but at least you have a good ped, and I am glad you are fililng a complaint!

tarnalberry Community Regular

I'm sorry you had such a rotten experience with the GI, but that's great that your ped's working with you so well!

happygirl Collaborator

Char:

I will spare you the details (which I affectionately refer to as my sob story :D )

90% of the doctors that I have seen since my health odyssey started 3 years ago fall into the camp of your gastro. In general, I tend not to get along particularly well with GIs. Only one (a doc at Johns Hopkins) fell in the same camp as what I believe (Celiac, gluten intolerance, gluten allergy, at this point---who cares what it is. Gluten is a problem for me, end of story).

I am really happy that you have a ped who sees the obvious. It makes such a difference to have that support!!!!

prinsessa Contributor

My son's GI doctor told me that the blood tests were almost 100% accurate. I haven't found any data to back that claim up. She wanted me to do a endoscopy on him, but I just don't feel it is necessary. I decided to keep him on a gluten free diet and he has gain 3 lbs in the last 3 months. He jumped a couple of percentiles in height and weight, so I know the diet is working. My regular doctor has no problem with me trying the diet on him for a while to see if he gains weight.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Juliet Newbie

Here is a GREAT link that talks about the accuracy of the antigliadin blood tests - Open Original Shared Link . Basically, there is no 100% foolproof blood test, but it's pretty close IF someone is eating enough gluten for a long enough period of time before taking the test. It took me awhile to understand it, but once I did it helped me to understand why even doctors might not get it. But there are definitely no absolutes. That's why the "gold standard" is still the biopsy, however as others have discussed, unless there is very extensive damage, it may be difficult to find any damage in the intestines since it's not visible to the naked eye.

laurac Newbie

Hi-- Just wanted to add my story about blood tests etc.

My son is 8yrs old now and was officially diagnosed on Halloween via biopsies which his GI from Children's Hosp in Boston said was the only definitive test. I need to back up a little and say that he was treated by the same GI from 3 to 5 yrs old for other issues which may or may not have been Celiac related. ( He was in a body cast which caused all sorts of problems plus he has renal issues which can be related to bowel issues) Anyway, before he was discharged originally by the GI he did have a Celiac blood panel ordered and it came back completely negative. (My husband has celiac disease).

Fastforward 3 years and my son was soooooo underweight and had the big distended belly and dark circles under his eyes. I brought him to the ped and she said he hadn't gained 1 ounce in over a year but had grown 2 inches so he was actually losing weight and ordered the panel again and sent us right back to the GI. His numbers were very high on several aspects of the test. Even the GI said he was neg 3 yrs ago and this seemed to upset him. He ordered the biopsies which were not that big a deal and my son did not mind at all and these came back pos and he has pretty extensive damage to his gut.

I guess the reason I tell you this is because tests can be very inconclusive and definitely not 100% accurate.

He is gluten free and is doing very well. He doesn't miss the old food because he feels so much better and doesn't look yellow any more.

Laura C

2boysmama Apprentice

Oh yes - we had a similar experience with a pediatric GI doctor. To add insult to injury we work for the same hospital and she KNOWS me ! :angry: She also believed that because my son's celiac panel was negative then he CAN'T be having issues with glutens, and when I refused to allow her to do the biopsy she was no longer interested in helping us out. She said "the celiac diet sucks and it's really hard." and when I told her about EnteroLab she nearly came unglued and said "they're scam artists."

:angry:

He's had WONDERFUL results with the celiac diet, as have DH and I. It was hard to adjust to at first, but now that we've adjusted we're so happy we switched and will never go back to the way we used to eat (and feel!).

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,699
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    RelievedP
    Newest Member
    RelievedP
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wends
      Hopefully the biopsy gives a conclusive and correct diagnosis for your daughter. Im in the UK and have been in the situation a few years ago of trying to rule celiac in or out after inconclusive results. Many symptoms pointing to it including the classic symptoms and weight loss and folate and iron deficiency. You have to play a waiting game. I also had the label of IBS and likely food allergy. Genetic test showed low risk for celiac but not no risk. It sounds like the Gastroenterologist is on it and hopefully will diagnose what it is correctly. Food hypersensitivity (allergy) can also cause similar symptoms and inflammation as well as mimicking IBS. Milk / dairy and wheat (cereal grains) being the biggest culprits. The “oesophagitis” and “gastritis” you mentioned can be caused by another gastrointestinal disorder called “eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders”. These are named depending on which part of the gastrointestinal tract is affected. For example eosinophilic oesophagitis, eosinophilic gastritis, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, and more rare eosinophilic colitis. They are antigen (allergen) driven. When the blood test measuring anti-ttg antibodies is positive in absence of a positive ema test - which is more specific to celiac, this can also suggest food hypersensitivity (allergy). Usually delayed type allergy similar to celiac but not autoimmune if that makes sense. In this case the ttg antibodies are transient. Which happens. I’ve first hand experience. For info, evidence of villous atrophy too can be caused by food hypersensitivity. Not just by celiac disease. In Egid disorders the six food elimination diet, under a dietitian and gastroenterologist care, is the dietary protocol to figure out the culprit or culprits. Sometimes only two food elimination diet is used at first. The number one culprit is milk protein / dairy. Followed by wheat, eggs, soy, fish and seafood, and nuts. Most are only reactive to one food group or two. Most are only reactive to milk. Hope this is a helpful reply.
    • Bennyboy1998
    • Wends
      Wow, the system is crazy isn’t it? Maybe switch Doctors if you can. It’s surprising from what you’ve written it seems obvious it’s celiac disease. The “potential” diagnosis means celiac is developing and it basically just hasn’t done enough gut damage to be captured on the biopsy yet, and meet that “criteria” to satisfy the current system! Given the overwhelming evidence already - family history, positive ttg and ema. And your own experience and intuition which counts far more. And the labs being reproduced after gluten elimination and reintroduction- elimination and reintroduction diet is the gold standard too. Shame on the Doc and the system. What was the Marsh score? I’m guessing not 0 if it’s potential celiac. Meaning the autoimmune process has been triggered and started. Your daughter is obviously very healthy and her immune system is putting up a good fight. It can take years for the gut damage to build to a point where there’s overt symptoms and then a conclusive diagnosis, hence why many celiacs receive diagnosis later in life. You can prevent it. See the positive and the gift in that. Hopefully the gluten challenge confirms it, but if it doesn’t maybe get a second opinion?
    • cristiana
      @Gigi2025  Thank you for your interesting post.  Some of what you say chimes with something my gastroenterologist tells me - that he has clients who travel to France and find the same as you  - they will eat normal wheat baguette there without issue, for example.  His theory was he thought it might be to do with the locally sourced wheat being different to our own in the UK? But I have to say my own experience has been quite different. I have been to France twice since my diagnosis, and have been quite ill due to what was then (pre-2019)  poor labelling and cross-contamination issues.  My TTG test following my last visit was elevated - 'proof of the pudding', as we say in the UK!  It was not just a case of eating something like, say, shellfish, that disagreed with me - gluten was clearly an issue. I've also been to Italy to visit family a couple of times since my diagnosis.  I did not want to take any chances so kept to my gluten free diet, but whilst there what I did notice is that coeliacs are very well catered for in Italy, and many brands with the same ingredients in the UK are clearly marked on the front of their packaging that they are 'senza glutine'.  In the UK, you would have to find that information in the small print - or it puts people off buying it, so I am told!  So it seems to me the Italians are very coeliac aware - in fact, all children are, I believe, screened for coeliac disease at the age of 6.  That must mean, I guess, that many Italian coeliacs are actively avoiding gluten because, presumably, if they don't, they will fall ill?        
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you both very much. I’m pretty familiar with the various tests, and my older two girls with official dxs have even participated in research on other tests as well. I just felt overwhelmed and shocked that these recent results (which I found pretty dang conclusive after having scott clean labs just six months ago) would still be considered inconclusive. Doc said we could biopsy in another six weeks because my daughter was actually way more upset than I anticipated about the idea of eating it for years before doing another biopsy. It doesn’t hurt her, but she’s afraid of how it may be hurting her in ways she can’t feel. She’s currently eating mini wheats for breakfast, a sandwich with lunch, and a side of pasta along with every dinner, so I’m hoping we’re meeting that 10g benchmark mentioned in that second article!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.