Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Oats


lilliexx

Recommended Posts

lilliexx Contributor

i broke down and bought a cereal today that contains oat flour. the box says wheat free but not gluten free. i havnt actually eatin any of it yet, it was a spur of the moment thing that i kind of regret. it was just too tempting becuz the gluten free cereal selection is horrible!! :angry: and i really miss my cereal in the morning!!

do any of you eat oats?? and does it bother you?

i am basically wondering if its low risk or high risk.....and if i should take a chance...


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



celiac3270 Collaborator

There is a high likelihood that oats are contaminated. First off, they are often grown in fields that previously grew wheat or barley. Here's what the celiac.com safe/forbidden ingredient list had to say about oats:

3) Recent research indicates that oats may be safe for people on gluten-free diets, although many people may also have an additional, unrelated intolerance to them. Cross contamination with wheat is also a factor that you need to consider before choosing to include oats in your diet.

There are many articles on celiac.com about oats, but here is one that refers to contamination in particular as could occur through fields used for many grains, dust, and unclean machinery/contaminatoin at the mill:

https://www.celiac.com/st_prod.html?p_prodi...-54104150730.06

Oh, I should also mention that as something can be wheat-free, but not gluten-free, you should definitely check the box or call the company about any other forms of gluten (rye, barley, malt, etc.)

jaycee30 Apprentice

Lillie,

I last ate something with oats in it about 3 years ago...the results were instant and BAD ;) and I haven't touched it since. I just got DX'd a month ago, but knew there was something wrong with oats, at least for me. I guess everyone is different but from what I am reading, oats are out for those with celiac disease.

Have you tried any of the Envirokidz cereals? I found some at my local Smith's grocery store and bought just so I would have something around. The "Gorilla Munch", made with corn, sugar and salt, is great! Not too sweet, crunchy in milk, and really really tasty. Especially when you've not been able to eat a cereal for breakfast in a while!

They have a website...just google for it, plus it is sold online at a couple of places. You may want to give it a try.

Jen

lovegrov Collaborator

Oat contamination rate in the U.S. is VERY high. Everybody who knows anything about celiac disease says U.S. oats are a complete no-no.

richard

tarnalberry Community Regular

There was a study that was posted here at celiac.com a while ago that I can't seem to find, but it had an analysis of major brands of oats and their offending gluten content. I believe the major US brands were all over 0.1% of protein coming from gluten. Given that even the CODEX standard is 200ppm (or 0.0002% total (not just protein)), and oats are 17% protein, that means that the major US brands are almost an order of magnitude over the CODEX standard (at 1700ppm). You might look around and see if you can find it, but that's why I won't eat US oats.

lilliexx Contributor

thanks for all the replies. i bought the envirokindz cereal today!! thanks celiac3270!!

Guest gfinnebraska

This is my favorite cereal that I find on the Gluten Free Pantry web site. They have the one you bought already, plus other flavors as well. I also enjoy a good crunch in the morning!! :) K

#914 Amaranth Cinnamon Snaps Cereal

Amaranth Cereal Snaps - Cinnamon

Gluten Free & Wheat Free

Breakfast is served!

You don't have to be a kid to love them !!. Toasty amaranth morsels are coated with a blend of cinnamon to create a bowlful of flavor.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  • 4 weeks later...
beelzebubble Contributor

irish oats, such as mccann's, are supposed to have a much smaller (to no) chance of contamination. i've eaten them without problems.

seeking-wholeness Explorer

I think some celiacs just plain react to oats, cross-contaminated or not. I finally realized that I was reacting to McMann's oats. I hadn't been considering them as a possible culprit since they are supposed to be safe, but after I stopped eating them my stools normalized again and my acne outbreak cleared up (both signs of a gluten "accident" for me).

I know that at least one small study demonstrated that some celiacs do develop villous atrophy after eating uncontaminated oats. Since I have suspicious symptoms, I avoid oats entirely now.

--Sarah

  • 4 weeks later...
dkmb Newbie

Here is a link to an article from Forbes on oat contamination that I saw on another celiac disease forum Open Original Shared Link

It includes McCanns in those that were tested and found to have cross contamination.

DK

astyanax Rookie

would growing your own oats solve the problem? maybe someday i will live on a farm haha but it would be great to eat oats again - i personally find the contamination issue too confusing with conflicting information to eat oats, but i would eat them if they met the codex standard..

darlindeb25 Collaborator
<_< i accidentally ate barley for 1 week, i had no symptoms from it--i found out by accident that i was eating barley--now we all know we cannot have barley--my sister, who is also celiac, told me that just because we do not have a violent reaction to something does not mean it isnt in there doing damage to our villi---SOOOOOOOOOOOO my guestion is--even if you can tolerate oats, are you still causing damage to your system :( deb
Carriefaith Enthusiast

I reacted to the oat extract in my suncreen (Only the medical ingredients were listed on the bottle. I had to go on the internet to see the the non-medical ingredients). I haven't used it since......

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,073
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    ImVenus
    Newest Member
    ImVenus
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
    • Scott Adams
      BTW, we've done other articles on this topic that I wanted to share here (not to condone smoking!):    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.