Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Unsure


natalie

Recommended Posts

natalie Apprentice

Hi Everyone,

I have posted in the past as my daughter has been Celiac for 1 1/2 years now. At the time of her diagnosis, after reading the symtpoms, I was sure I had suffered from celiac. The only problem is.... I am overweight, actually obese, so I was never taken seriously. I did the Entrolab and my results were :

Fecal Antigliadin IgA 209 (Normal Range <10 Units)

Fecal Antitissue Transglutaminase IgA 35 Units (Normal Range <10 Units)

Quantitative Microscopic Fecal Fat Score 371 Units (Normal Range <300 Units)

Fecal anti-casein (cow


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



CarlaB Enthusiast

In some cases the damage is so minor it can't be seen by the naked eye. I'd say if your GI could see the damage, it will most likely show up in the microscope, too.

It's a mistake, and doctors should know better, but many celiacs are overweight. There was a woman who used to post here who lost 100 pounds when she went gluten-free. This misconception is probably part of the reason it's so under-diagnosed.

I'd start with the gluten-free diet today!

Nancym Enthusiast

Yeah, they can see indications of celiac in "scalloping" in a particular area.

So hey, interesting comparison with the Enterolab results!

About a 1/3 of celiacs are overweight so you just can't tell by someone's weight.

natalie Apprentice

Thanks everyone,

I started the gluten free diet on Friday afternoon. I haven't noticed a difference yet, I made need to give up dairy for a little while.

Yes, I thought it was interesting the comparison between Entrolab and the GI doctor. In Canada we need a biopsy confirmation to get tax credits for food, so I wanted the biopsy. I think the Entrolab results helped push him to do a biopsy.

Thanks again for the replies.

Natalie

alamaz Collaborator

you definitely need to eliminate dairy from your diet. you tested positive for it through Enterolab.

natalie Apprentice
you definitely need to eliminate dairy from your diet. you tested positive for it through Enterolab.

Does that mean forever, or just until my intestines start to heal?

Natalie

CarlaB Enthusiast
Does that mean forever, or just until my intestines start to heal?

Natalie

If you really have a casein intolerance, it's forever.

I say it like that because I had a 32 on the Enterolab test. I went off dairy for six months and saw no improvement whatsoever. I went back on it and saw no difference at all.

I would definately go dairy free for a time, but at some point you could test it to see if you're really casein intolerant. Tests aren't perfect.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



natalie Apprentice
If you really have a casein intolerance, it's forever.

I say it like that because I had a 32 on the Enterolab test. I went off dairy for six months and saw no improvement whatsoever. I went back on it and saw no difference at all.

I would definately go dairy free for a time, but at some point you could test it to see if you're really casein intolerant. Tests aren't perfect.

Thanks Carla.

Do you know if doctors can do other tests for casein allergies?

Natalie

happygirl Collaborator

doctors can do a true "allergy" (immediate reaction) test by doing an IgE food allergy test for casein/dairy. For "intolerances"/delayed allergies, they can run an IgG blood test for it.

Murph Newbie
Before the procedure he said that it rarely happens that people have negative blood work but positive biopsies.

Natalie

It's far from rare! A 2004 Columbia U. study showed only ~66% of those w/ "severe villous atrophy" were positive for celiac disease on the blood test.

More recent studies have shown a strange backwards effect where at some point on the spectrum of villous atrophy, the correlation to the blood test becomes less likely. Can't recall where I read this, but there is plenty of talk about "seronegative" & celiac.

gfgypsyqueen Enthusiast

Yup, I'm one of those negative blood works and positive biopsy people. The endoscopy was exploratory because I was having so many problems. I wasn't evenout of the drugs before the dr was saying it is text book celiacs and the biopsy results agreed. Don't know what to tell you about the blood work...

natalie Apprentice

It's nice to hear I am not the only person with negative blood work and a positive biopsy. I am concerned about my father who has suffered from severe depression, balance issues, white matter on the brain ( they are calling it early dementia), losing weight, upset stomach. They have done the celiac blood work after I insisted, it came back negative. I would like to get him to have the scope but here in Canada you need a referral and I can't get him to leave the house (depression).

Natalie

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,075
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Amy1620
    Newest Member
    Amy1620
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
    • Scott Adams
      BTW, we've done other articles on this topic that I wanted to share here (not to condone smoking!):    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.