Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Got Blood Test Results - No Idea What They Mean!

Lissa

Recommended Posts

Lissa Apprentice
Lissa
Posted

So my doctor printed off my paper, said they results were negative, and sent me on my way. I have no idea what these things mean, and I'm a little disappointed my results were negative. (Lie - I'm way disappointed) What should I do now? My doctor referred me to a GI, but the waiting list is 2 years. Should I go for the biopsy? My doctor thinks its stupid I'm persuing Celiac, I don't know even she'll even let me do it. But anyways, the results:

Anti-Gliadin IgA Antibody 18KEU/L (less than 20)

Anti-Gliadin IgG Antibody 11KEU/L (less than 20)

Tissue Transglutaminase Iga Ab 8KEU/L (less than 20)

False negative results may occur in patients who are IgA deficient.

Celiac Disease Interpretation

Negative IgA Endomysial (IgA Transglutaminase) antibodies and normal IgA and IgG Gliadin antibodies rule out active Celiac Disease in virtually all cases and Dermatitis Herpetiformis in approximately 80% of cases.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


mftnchn Explorer
mftnchn
Posted

GI referral is a two year wait? That's bizarre. Do you have any other options?

Some people here have had negative blood work and positive biopsy. So if you have symptoms I think you should keep pursuing the celiac question.

Lissa Apprentice
Lissa
Posted
  • Author
GI referral is a two year wait? That's bizarre. Do you have any other options?

Some people here have had negative blood work and positive biopsy. So if you have symptoms I think you should keep pursuing the celiac question.

Oh sorry, my mistake. It's only 16 months. 16 months is the average wait to get to see the GI. Or so my doctor tells me. My mom told me it was 2 years, but I believe the doc. <_<

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

Have you done a gluten-free trial? Sometimes that is the best way to tell if gluten is a problem. There are a number of folks who are celiac but still have negative blood work, that can delay diagnosis for a long time. A gluten-free trial and challenge may be more informative for you. You don't need a doctors permission to try living gluten-free to see if it helps.

lob6796 Contributor
lob6796
Posted
So my doctor printed off my paper, said they results were negative, and sent me on my way. I have no idea what these things mean, and I'm a little disappointed my results were negative. (Lie - I'm way disappointed) What should I do now? My doctor referred me to a GI, but the waiting list is 2 years. Should I go for the biopsy? My doctor thinks its stupid I'm persuing Celiac, I don't know even she'll even let me do it. But anyways, the results:

Anti-Gliadin IgA Antibody 18KEU/L (less than 20)

Anti-Gliadin IgG Antibody 11KEU/L (less than 20)

Tissue Transglutaminase Iga Ab 8KEU/L (less than 20)

False negative results may occur in patients who are IgA deficient.

Celiac Disease Interpretation

Negative IgA Endomysial (IgA Transglutaminase) antibodies and normal IgA and IgG Gliadin antibodies rule out active Celiac Disease in virtually all cases and Dermatitis Herpetiformis in approximately 80% of cases.

Is it possible for you to get a second opinion? Where I live, and IgA of higher than 2.9 is a complete positive diagnosis of celiac, and an IgG of over 10 is a probable diagnosis of celiac with a follow biopsy ordered to confirm. Do you live in Canada? I'm just wondering because of the 16 month wait for a GI. The one downside to healthcare for everyone is long waits. I would still try to get s second opinion. If that isnt possible, I would go gluten free and see how you feel after a few months on it.

mamaloca2 Apprentice
mamaloca2
Posted
So my doctor printed off my paper, said they results were negative, and sent me on my way. I have no idea what these things mean, and I'm a little disappointed my results were negative. (Lie - I'm way disappointed) What should I do now? My doctor referred me to a GI, but the waiting list is 2 years. Should I go for the biopsy? My doctor thinks its stupid I'm persuing Celiac, I don't know even she'll even let me do it. But anyways, the results:

Anti-Gliadin IgA Antibody 18KEU/L (less than 20)

Anti-Gliadin IgG Antibody 11KEU/L (less than 20)

Tissue Transglutaminase Iga Ab 8KEU/L (less than 20)

False negative results may occur in patients who are IgA deficient.

Celiac Disease Interpretation

Negative IgA Endomysial (IgA Transglutaminase) antibodies and normal IgA and IgG Gliadin antibodies rule out active Celiac Disease in virtually all cases and Dermatitis Herpetiformis in approximately 80% of cases.

My nutritionalist explained to me that you can have neg. results for celiac but be gluten intolerant instead. He explained that the two act the same but the difference is that in Celiac the villi are destroyed, and if you are gluten intolerant your intestines are inflamed. Both lead to malabsorbtion just differ in the mechanisms that cause it. In the case of gluten intolerance, it can be tested by checking ("cytokine"?) levels. I don't know if that's the right exact word or not. Anyway, my daughter was also supposedly neg for Celiac, so he is running food allergy blood tests on her which should hopefully tell us if she's gluten intolerant. He seems to know what he's talking about...hope this helps.

CarlaB Enthusiast
CarlaB
Posted

I'd go on the diet. If you get better, you know you have a gluten problem ... whether it's celiac or gluten intolerance doesn't matter.

If you don't get better, start looking for what else may be causing your problems.

I wonder why they didn't test your total Iga to see if you were deficient ... they even wrote on the test that some are deficient ... that's something they can test for.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Lissa Apprentice
Lissa
Posted
  • Author
Is it possible for you to get a second opinion? Where I live, and IgA of higher than 2.9 is a complete positive diagnosis of celiac, and an IgG of over 10 is a probable diagnosis of celiac with a follow biopsy ordered to confirm. Do you live in Canada? I'm just wondering because of the 16 month wait for a GI. The one downside to healthcare for everyone is long waits. I would still try to get s second opinion. If that isnt possible, I would go gluten free and see how you feel after a few months on it.

Haha, yes, I live in Canada.

Lissa Apprentice
Lissa
Posted
  • Author

I have a question....are the results different in Canada then the States? (I'm assuming so)

and I would like to point out that my doctor is an idiot. She said that celiac and gluten intolerance are the same thing.

CarlaB Enthusiast
CarlaB
Posted

I don't think there's a universal test. There should be a reference range on your results that tell you what is normal.

Lissa Apprentice
Lissa
Posted
  • Author
I don't think there's a universal test. There should be a reference range on your results that tell you what is normal.

I think that's what the (less than 20) means.

CarlaB Enthusiast
CarlaB
Posted
I think that's what the (less than 20) means.

Yeah ... :lol: I didn't scroll back up when I posted to see if the range was there. I'd go with the reference range the lab set. It can vary.

SpikeMoore Apprentice
SpikeMoore
Posted

Hi everyone

I get the celiac newsletter online as a result of registering for this site. I think it was in the one from May 9 that summarizes the rate of false negatives from a study in the April 2004 Journal of digestives diseases and sciences.. It differentiates between total villus atrophy and partial atrophy. I can't remember exactly, but for the patients with partial atrophy, blood work was positive for celiac only 30% of the time. The rate of false negatives for total atrophy was also very significant. The summary is that blood work is not nearly as accurate as doctors are lead to believe it is.

I had the same response from my doctor. He said "the blood work was negative, therefore you are not celiac." I chose not to go for a referral to a GI, because in the end I asked myself what is important. Having someone in a lab coat say "yes, you are right, don't eat gluten, it's bad for you" after another 6 months to a year+ of waiting and postponing potential healing, or trying it to see how you feel and if you feel better, you have your answer.

I've never felt better and won't look back.

mamabear Explorer
mamabear
Posted

This is why everyone gets bent out of shape! You know something is wrong....the tests are negative..you wait 2 months to 16 months(geographically speaking!) to get a referral to a GI with NO guarantee they will biopsy you.....so you choose to go gluten free....Maybe you feel great for a few months, but if you get sick again, do you think your own diagnosis was wrong.....or do you keep searching for the hidden gluten???????? Will your PCP or the GI try and unravel what is kinked up??

There are no easy answers here. Waiting 16 months for a GI seems unbearable to me. With 200+ symptoms of celiac disease, it is hard to keep pushing for the 1% diagnosis.....if all the serologic tests were negative. BUT! Listen to your gut feelings(all puns intended)....and with your national health service limitations......I'd be inclined to go ahead and try the diet.

BTW, they(GI traditionalists) are recently understanding there HAS to be a category of non-biopsy positive gluten sensitives non- celiac....it will make the GI's job all the more complex and take them longer to unravel...well, I think you know where I'm going with this. They don't cope if they can't scope! You can quote me on that! B)

aikiducky Apprentice
aikiducky
Posted
They don't cope if they can't scope! You can quote me on that! B)

Love that! And I will quote you! :D

With such a long waiting list I would be inclined to try the diet, too.

Pauliina

bugstabber Rookie
bugstabber
Posted
I'd go on the diet. If you get better, you know you have a gluten problem ... whether it's celiac or gluten intolerance doesn't matter.

If you don't get better, start looking for what else may be causing your problems.

I wonder why they didn't test your total Iga to see if you were deficient ... they even wrote on the test that some are deficient ... that's something they can test for.

So, what would a lab range for total IgA be?

natalie Apprentice
natalie
Posted

I live in Canada as well. In my area ( Waterloo Ontario) I waited about 7 months to the the GI doctor and then 4 weeks to have the scope. It was well worth the wait because my scope was positive. Because my daughter was diagnosed at 2 with celiac the doctor took me a little more serious. I had all negative blood work except for the Igg was slightly positive. Do you have anyone in your family who has celiac?

Have you tried the Entrolab test? I had that and my numbers were through the roof, I think that those results helped the GI doctor to do the scope.

Good Luck

Natalie

Lissa Apprentice
Lissa
Posted
  • Author

WOW! Thanks all, for your help. I really appreciate it. However, I'm in need of some help, please....

I'm not sure I'm Celiac anymore. Lately, I've still been feeling like crap but my runs arent as bad as usual. I'm really confused. However, all the gluten I've been eating lately has been a bagel at breakfast, but shouldn't I be getting the runs from that? My blood test was negative, maybe that's telling me something. Perhaps I'm looking at the wrong thing. So my question...

If I am not Celiac and I try the diet, will I be messing up my body? (cutting gluten out, seeing it doesn't help, then going back to gluten?)

And can anyone tell me what some proper Celiac are? I can tell you I get the runs (which I'm not getting as often) but what else could be affecting me?

Whats the difference between gluten intolerance and Celiac?

What kinds of foods can I eat on a gluten free diet? Which are the major not-commonly-know-but-are-in-fact-glutenized products?

How much is an Enterolab test?

Thanks, everyone. I'll be happy with any help you can give me.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,199
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Carlos Burbano
    Newest Member
    Carlos Burbano
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      CT with contrast.

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      New labs are now very elevated

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
    • trents
      Chances of being coeliac

      By trents · Posted

      @JettaGirl, "Coeliac" is the British spelling of "celiac". Same disease. 
    • JettaGirl
      Chances of being coeliac

      By JettaGirl · Posted

      This may sound ridiculous but is this supposed to say Celiacs? I looked up Coeliacs because you never know, there’s a lot of diseases related to a disease that they come up with similar names for. It’s probably meant to say Celiacs but I just wanted to confirm.
    • JoJo0611
      CT with contrast.

      By JoJo0611 · Posted

      I was told it was to see how much damage has been caused. But just told CT with contrast not any other name for it. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.