Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

I Need A Bit Of Advice

brittanyrk

Recommended Posts

brittanyrk Newbie
brittanyrk
Posted

Hi. I'm new here, but have been mostly gluten free for 5 years now.

My question is, when I was tested (blood test) for celiac disease (at age 13), I had not been eating any wheat for several weeks prior to. I didn't realize at the time that that made a difference. My symptoms were rather mild and I was only tested because my dad had tested positive. So my parents decided it was best for me to stay gluten free. So fast forward to just recently, I local restaurant got in a new item, which I checked out and loved. It had modified food starch. I never got sick and I ate the several times before I remembered to check out the MFS further. Turns out it was Wheat. So, being the adventurous 18 year old I am, I started eating other things with wheat in them. I'm feeling fine! no symptoms at all. I've started eating a tiny bit daily the last few weeks and I can't notice any difference.

So what I'm getting at is- should I be retested? or just eat as long as I don't go overboard?

Thanks for any advice you can offer!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Guest Bobbi
Guest Bobbi
Posted

I am surely not a doctor but my advice would be to be retested. If you did not test positive for celiac when you were younger it may have been because you were not eating gluten prior to taking the test or that you do not have celiac. The blood screening test is easy and if you have been "glutenated" you might as well be tested now. It would be silly to live "gluten-free" if it is not necessary. Just remember you need to be eating products with gluten in it prior to the test or it will not be accurate. Good luck....I hope you continue to feel well!

CarlaB Enthusiast
CarlaB
Posted

I would say to continue your binge for four months, then get retested. That is how long it takes for the damage to show up in testing. If at any time you start showing symptoms, then it's up to you whether you want to continue until time for testing, or quit because you know it's a problem for you.

You will want to eat the equivalent of three or four slices of bread daily.

Honestly, if I were you, I'd want to know for sure just like you do.

Lisa Mentor
Lisa
Posted
Hi. I'm new here, but have been mostly gluten free for 5 years now.

My question is, when I was tested (blood test) for celiac disease (at age 13), I had not been eating any wheat for several weeks prior to. I didn't realize at the time that that made a difference. My symptoms were rather mild and I was only tested because my dad had tested positive. So my parents decided it was best for me to stay gluten free. So fast forward to just recently, I local restaurant got in a new item, which I checked out and loved. It had modified food starch. I never got sick and I ate the several times before I remembered to check out the MFS further. Turns out it was Wheat. So, being the adventurous 18 year old I am, I started eating other things with wheat in them. I'm feeling fine! no symptoms at all. I've started eating a tiny bit daily the last few weeks and I can't notice any difference.

So what I'm getting at is- should I be retested? or just eat as long as I don't go overboard?

Thanks for any advice you can offer!

Brittany, may I call you that.?

You tested positive for Celiac, which mean that you cannot have wheat, barley, rye, malt and selective oats. Being diagnosed with Celiac is a bit complex. You might overload and get hit hard by gluten symptoms and it might build up and may be dibiliatory at some time.

Perhaps you doctor caught this early and you have few symptoms. But this will be with you for life. Even if you do not have symptoms, you could still be doing damage to your intestines. Some here have silent symptoms, but that damage still continues.

If you are diagnosed with Celiac, please read as much as you can from this site. It is the best source for information that you can find. We are a good group of folks and are wiling for afford you any information that you need. Ask away.

Regarding Modified Food Starch in the US if it is derived for wheat, by law it would be included in the labeling statement on the ingredients.

Welcome to Celiac land.

CarlaB Enthusiast
CarlaB
Posted
You tested positive for Celiac

By her post, I was assuming her test was negative. If it was positive, I agree with Momma Goose.

brittanyrk Newbie
brittanyrk
Posted
  • Author

they said the results showed borderline positive.... any idea what that means?

Lisa Mentor
Lisa
Posted

Your key work is "positive"... Take time to read from some of these post. You might find a light bulb moment?

Welcome, and please continue to join us.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


debmidge Rising Star
debmidge
Posted

Borderline Positive and you were eating gluten....I think you might have to consider yourself as having celiac or at worst wheat intolerant. I think you answered your own question...now the problem is whether to purse a second opinion/test.....in order to make a re-test accurate you have to eat the gluten (as Carla stated) in order to get your anti-body levels high enough to be found on the test.

You might not feel ill by eating gluten but if you have celiac or are intolerant I'll catch up with you one way or another.

If you want to be re-tested, then make up your mind when you are starting the gluten diet and then definitely get the blood test -- don't eat gluten, then change your mind, then change your mind again and go back and forth as you'll affect the test resuts. Focus on eating the gluten for however many weeks/months it takes -- get tested -- then upon finding out the results make your final determination if you need to stay gluten-free or not.

Best wishes.

Deb

jerseyangel Proficient
jerseyangel
Posted

Hi,

I'm thinking if you tested borderline high, and had been gluten-free for a few weeks beforehand, that's a positive result.

Celiac can wane during the teenage years, and become symptomatic again as you go through your 20's. I can see how tempting it is to eat whatever you want, as you're not presently having symptoms. That, however, dosen't mean that your intestine isn't being damaged.

To avoid complications in the future, I think you should remain gluten-free.

cruelshoes Enthusiast
cruelshoes
Posted
Hi. I'm new here, but have been mostly gluten free for 5 years now.

My question is, when I was tested (blood test) for celiac disease (at age 13), I had not been eating any wheat for several weeks prior to. I didn't realize at the time that that made a difference. My symptoms were rather mild and I was only tested because my dad had tested positive. So my parents decided it was best for me to stay gluten free. So fast forward to just recently, I local restaurant got in a new item, which I checked out and loved. It had modified food starch. I never got sick and I ate the several times before I remembered to check out the MFS further. Turns out it was Wheat. So, being the adventurous 18 year old I am, I started eating other things with wheat in them. I'm feeling fine! no symptoms at all. I've started eating a tiny bit daily the last few weeks and I can't notice any difference.

So what I'm getting at is- should I be retested? or just eat as long as I don't go overboard?

Thanks for any advice you can offer!

Borderline positive is positive in my book. We just had an appointment with the pediatric GI doctor this week. We discussed this very issue. He said it is nearly impossible to get a false positive on the celiac bloodwork. False negative maybe, but a false positive, no. It's like being a little bit pregnant. ;)

Very ofter, teenagers experience what is known as a "honeymoon period". The hormones coursing through our bodies during puberty can make the celiac symptoms seem to go away. The internal damage is still continuing, but the symptoms go away. No symptoms does not mean no damage. When my son was diagnosed at age 6 he had no symptoms. We screened him as a first degree relative after I was diagnosed. He had no symptoms, but his bloodwork numbers were as high as mine were, and he had severe damage in his intestines. I was near death, but he seemed to be fine. Outward symptoms do not equate to internal damage.

What do your parents say abut the matter?

CarlaB Enthusiast
CarlaB
Posted
they said the results showed borderline positive.... any idea what that means?

If you had borderline positive while gluten-free or gluten-lite, then I'd say you have celiac.

I don't think there is such a thing as borderline positive ... I think it's more like a pregnancy test ... it's either positive or negative. :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,283
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Ron W
    Newest Member
    Ron W
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • numike
      is my cleiac disease gone?

      By numike · Posted

      69yo M I have had skin cancer basal  I use a higher quality Vit D https://www.amazon.com/Biotech-D3-5-5000iu-Capsules-Count/dp/B00NGMJRTE
    • Wheatwacked
      is my cleiac disease gone?

      By Wheatwacked · Posted

      Your high lactulose test, indicating out of control Small Itenstinal Bacterial O,vergrowth is one symptom.  You likely have low vitamin D, another symptom.  Unless you get lots of sun.   Celiac Disease is a disease of malabsorption, often leading to subclinical vitamin deficiencies.  A lot of people have these symptoms just before an acute phase of Celiac Disease.  Each of the symptoms can have multiple causes that are not celiac disease,  but when you start having multiple symptoms,  and each symptom is treated as a separate disease,  you have to think, maybe these are all one cause. celiac disease. There is a misconception that Celiac Disease is  a gastrointestinal disease and symptoms are only gastro related.  Wrong.  It is an autoimmune disease and has many symptoms that usually are disregarded.  I made that mistake until 63 y.o.  It can cause a dermatitis herpetiformis rash,  white spots on the brain.  It caused my alcoholism, arthritis, congested sineses, protein spots on my contacts lenses, swollen prostate, symptoms that are "part of aging". You may be tolerating gluten, the damage will happen. Of curiosity though, your age, sex, are you outside a lot without sunscreen?  
    • trents
      is my cleiac disease gone?

      By trents · Posted

      It would be interesting to see if you were tested again for blood antibodies after abandoning the gluten free diet for several weeks to a few months what the results would be. Don't misunderstand me. I'm not necessarily suggesting you do this but it is an option to think about. I guess I'm saying there is a question in my mind as to whether you actually ever had celiac disease. As I said above, the blood antibody testing can yield false positives. And it is also true that celiac-like symptoms can be produced by other medical conditions.
    • numike
      is my cleiac disease gone?

      By numike · Posted

      Thank you for the reply In the early 2000's I did not have the endoscopy nor the biopsy I do not have those initial records I have only consulted a GI drs in the USA 
    • trents
      is my cleiac disease gone?

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @numike! We sometimes get reports like yours from community members who believe their celiac disease has "gone away." We think there can sometimes be cases of remission but not long term healing and that continued consumption of gluten will eventually result in a relapse. This is the state of our knowledge at this point but there is still a lot we don't know and celiac disease continues to surprise us with new findings on a frequent basis. So, we would not advise you to abandon a strict gluten-free diet. Perhaps you can draw consolation from the fact that at the present time you seem to be able to consume gluten without consequences when in situations where you do not have the option to eat gluten-free. But I would advise you to not generalize your recent experience such that you throw caution to the wind. But I want to go back to what you said about being diagnosed by blood test in the early 2000's. Did you not also have that confirmed with an endoscopy and biopsy of the small bowel lining? Normally, a celiac disease diagnosis is not concluded based on a blood test alone because there can be false positives. What kind of doctor did this testing? Was it done in the U.S. or overseas? In the last few years, it has become common in the U.K. to grant a celiac diagnosis from blood testing alone if the antibody test scores are 10x normal or greater. But that practice has not caught on in the U.S. yet and was not in place internationally in the early 2000's. Do you have a record of the tests that were done, the scores and also the reference ranges for negative vs. positive for the tests?
×
×
  • Create New...