Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Do I Need A Second Opinion?


maxwell1200

Recommended Posts

maxwell1200 Apprentice

I was diagnosed on Tuesday being positive for celiac disease. They based this on a blood test alone. I have read many of the post and replies and can relate with so many of the stories and have the same symptoms. 10 years ago I was diagnosed with IB and been trying to deal with it and keep it under control. Now they say I have celiac disease, do I need a second opinion?

Angela


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



gf4life Enthusiast

Hi Angela,

Your question about if you need a second opinion or not really depends. Are you questioning the validity of the bloodtests? Are you thinking that it might be wrong? It is a slim possiblity, but if you have symptoms and have previously been diagnosed IBS then the likelyhood of it being celiac disease is pretty high.

You might want to get a few more follow-up tests to check for nutritional deficiencies, and the only reason you would need a biopsy is to either have it as a pre-gluten free reference to compare with a future biopsy to check for improvement, or to convince a doctor that you do have celiac disease. If you doctor is willing to diagnose you based on the blood alone, then that would be okay in my mind. Of course the next doctor might tell you that you HAVE to have the biopsy to get a diagnosis. It is up to you to decide what is best for you.

There are problems with both the blood test and biopsy, but usually positive blood tests mean Celiac. It is the negatives that can often be false. It is like this: a positive test means positive for the disease, but a negative does not always mean negative for the disease, it can mean that you are not advanced enough with it to produce antibodies in the blood. The biopsy is not fail proof either. The damage can be spotty and it takes a skilled (and lucky) doctor, taking many tissue samples in the right places, to get an accurate diagnosis. If the doctor doesn't take enough samples and fromt he right places then you end up with a negative biopsy and are back to the IBS diagnosis.

If you feel the diagnosis is accurate, and you feel better off gluten, then I would go with that. But if you feel like you need a second opinion and a biopsy, then you had better stay on gluten while you seek those things, since going off of gluten will alter future test results.

God bless,

Mariann

maxwell1200 Apprentice

Thanks Mariann,

The test are probably right. I have only been gluten-free for 2 days. Ill give it time.

Angela

ys2kera Newbie

i need some help,,,,,, i have had 2 blood test and both came back pos for celiac disease one biopsy came back pos and the second after one month off the gluten free diet came back neg. What do i do?

darlindeb25 Collaborator
:unsure: i would go with the blood test--you may be gluten intolerant, maybe not full blown celiac yet and that is good--staying gluten-free will keep you from getting full blown celiacs--many times the blood work comes back celiac and the biospy comes back negative--i have read that so many times--gluten-free cant hurt you, but gluten may do damage you cant fix--i say, go gluten-free---deb :D
FreyaUSA Contributor

ys2kera, I'm not really certain what you're asking for help about. With 2 positive blood tests and one positive biopsy, you definitely have celiacs. My guess is that the follow up biopsy either was taken from an undamaged area or your time on the gluten-free diet has helped to heal you significantly enough that even with a single month off it, you are still far better off than you were. There's been much discussion on how long is needed off the diet to show damage. Obviously for you, one month isn't long enough (which isn't to say that it isn't hurting you in other ways.) Keep going gluten-free! It's working for you!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,902
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Patty6133
    Newest Member
    Patty6133
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.