Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Reactions


Tim-n-VA

Recommended Posts

Tim-n-VA Contributor

Prior to diagnosis I would have said I had no GI symptoms. Liver tests lead to blood tests which lead to biopsy. In retrospect those things I thought were a "24 hour flu" or "something spoiled" were likely gluten in hindsight (especially the ones after drinking wheat beer). :P

Having been gluten free for about a year, I have symptoms with small amounts of cross-contamination from wheat. Today, I wasn't paying close attention and took a bite of candy containing barley malt. I've had no symptoms yet (still plenty of time).

I will not routinely eat barley because I could easily be having internal reactions without external symptoms. It did make me wonder if people find they react worse to one form of gluten versus others?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



holiday16 Enthusiast

This is basically what I was asking the other day, but didn't get any replies so I did a bit of searching and basically what I found is that barley has a much lower gluten content than wheat. I was asking because I had accidentally had something that had been produced on the same lines as wheat products and was sick for 3 weeks. Then I accidentally had something with barley in (it was under natural flavors and I missed it) and the reaction was only for a couple days and not nearly so severe.

I will say that finding this out makes me feel much better about being able to avoid gluten. I'm still just as careful, but I don't feel as paranoid that if I accidentally misread a label and have something with barley in I'm going to be sick for weeks. My daughter had the same thing I did with the barley in and she never reacted which surprised me, but she's not as sensitive as I am either.

aikiducky Apprentice

I guess it's must be an individual thing - I seem too have maybe even more symptoms from barley then wheat, though it's hard to say because i haven't had any glutenings for a while that i know of.

Pauliina

Yellow Rose Explorer

I was just recovering from being glutened on Sunday. Wheat is definitely the worse for me. My reactions are getting longer and more painful with each glutening. Don't have the gut reaction I have joint and muscle pain that feels like I am being pulled apart with burning and spasms.

Yellow Rose

gfpaperdoll Rookie

I am 60, when I was 25 I tested allergic to barley & oats. For me barley is a killer & I still remember the last bagel I had about 15 years ago (they all have barley in them) I was sick for three weeks & the barley taste was in my mouth for at least at week. This was still when I was eating wheat on occasion right before I figured out that I had an "allergy" to wheat.

CMCM Rising Star

This can all be so tricky. I had lifelong digestive symptoms which I mistakenly thought was entirely due to dairy. I now know it was wheat. Wheat didn't always make me sick, which added to the confusion. Later I read that your body continually tries to adapt to the invader gluten, sometimes with more success than others.

Then if you go gluten free, you can actually become more sensitive and reactionary than you were when eating it regularly. Perhaps because you have had time to "adapt" with just sporadic exposure.

I've also noticed a change in reactions. Still moderate digestive upsets, but my latest reaction moved into the area of joint aches and pains. Very painful, and this scared me more than the digestive stuff did (perhaps because I'd lived with it for so long!).

And some things always bothered me more than others. Regular soy sauce, for example. I'm not sensitive to soy, but the wheat used in fermenting the soy sauce absolutely killed me. Possibly it was the combination of things. I know with other foods, certain combinations can be very deadly, digestively speaking.

Prior to diagnosis I would have said I had no GI symptoms. Liver tests lead to blood tests which lead to biopsy. In retrospect those things I thought were a "24 hour flu" or "something spoiled" were likely gluten in hindsight (especially the ones after drinking wheat beer). :P

Having been gluten free for about a year, I have symptoms with small amounts of cross-contamination from wheat. Today, I wasn't paying close attention and took a bite of candy containing barley malt. I've had no symptoms yet (still plenty of time).

I will not routinely eat barley because I could easily be having internal reactions without external symptoms. It did make me wonder if people find they react worse to one form of gluten versus others?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. 0

      Penobscot Bay, Maine: Nurturing Gluten-Free Wellness Retreat with expert celiac dietitian, Melinda Dennis

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    3. - Jane02 replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,326
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PattyPagnanelli
    Newest Member
    PattyPagnanelli
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I do not know this, but since they are labelled gluten-free, and are not really a product that could easily be contaminated when making them (there would be not flour in the air of such a facility, for example), I don't really see contamination as something to be concerned about for this type of product. 
    • trents
    • Jane02
      Thanks @Scott Adams. Do you know if Kirkland Signature supplements share facility and production lines with other products containing gluten?  I'm worried that I'll react to this brand just like I did with other gluten-free labelled supplement brands. 
    • Matthias
    • Scott Adams
      This is a really common area of confusion. Most natural cheeses (cheddar, Swiss, mozzarella, Parmesan, brie, camembert, and most blue cheeses) are inherently gluten-free, and you’re right that the molds used today are typically grown on gluten-free media. The bigger risks tend to come from processed cheeses: shredded cheese (anti-caking agents), cheese spreads, beer-washed rinds, smoke-flavored cheeses, and anything with added seasonings or “natural flavors,” where cross-contact can happen. As for yeast, you’re also correct — yeast itself is gluten-free. The issue is the source: brewer’s yeast and yeast extracts can be derived from barley unless labeled gluten-free, while baker’s yeast is generally safe. When in doubt, sticking with whole, unprocessed cheeses and products specifically labeled gluten-free is the safest approach, especially if you’re highly sensitive.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.